Play Nice 45th President of the United States: Donald Trump - Part 18: Insert your ideas here!

[ShanDog]

Mod Notice

Trump Part 19 is this way - >

Joe Biden, 46th President Thread is over there ->

< - Trump Part 17 is back there.

 

[OneGreatClub]

I'm guessing you see Trump everywhere.

I’m guessing you send him funding

 

[carltonchelsea]

Looks like old stickey is stinking up the thread again!
Over the weekend I saw a very funny reply to Trumps lack of ready cash and banks or creditors willing to lose 100’s of millions dollars fronting up for him, the reply was “Don Poorleone”.
It’s been added to now, “Don Poorleone, The Confather”.
Clever!

 

[NSWCROW]

I find it so amusing that's how limited you're thought process is.

 

[OneGreatClub]

He has been a very naughty boy

 

[The Sultan]

I am sure imaginary man has a sense of humour.

Ironically said by the other imaginary man who over sees us all.

 

[Chief]

Ironically said by the other imaginary man who over sees us all.

I'm a real boy!

 

[Satan]

So will Dylan howard ex 7 journo ( who got the sack for showing the health records of an ex hawk / swan on 7 news before legals got involved)
Be a witness in the stormy case or just his old boss pecker ( yes thats his surname) of national enquirer

 

[Satan]

I'm guessing you see Trump everywhere.

Hard to miss

 

[Stokey]

Hard to miss

He actually is if you try. Seems you're just looking in places where you know he'll be. Like here.

 

[darklake]

He just made $4b from the merger of his media company.

Plus he only has to pay $175m now after an appeals court once again overruled Erdogon.

I think he'll be ok.

Congrats to your hero bud.

But, he can't get his tiny mits on the $ from that deal for 6 months.

 

[Stokey]

Congrats to your hero bud.

But, he can't get his tiny mits on the $ from that deal for 6 months.

Sigh. He's not my hero.

Also, as mentioned it's unlikely he will need to access the shares.

 

[Stokey]

I’m guessing you send him funding

Well you would be wrong, again.

 

[Maggie5]

Also, how is posting a Bloomberg article 'swallowing Trump's kool aid'?

Because you only post positives (in your mind) or things that make him look better.

 

[Stokey]

Because you only post positives (in your mind) or things that make him look better.

And you only post negatives (in your mind).

I just posted tweets. Up to you how you want to interpret them.

 

[Chief]

Congrats to your hero bud.

But, he can't get his tiny mits on the $ from that deal for 6 months.

It'll be worth pocket change by the time he can sell it.

 

[Spearman]

So, the stock gets pumped up by this acquisition, but is TS getting more subs or ad buys?

 

[OneGreatClub]

And you only post negatives (in your mind).

I just posted tweets. Up to you how you want to interpret them.

Here’s the difference, we post stuff mocking your hero, and calling out his unsuitability to be anywhere near the WH. We OPENLY admit we believe Trump is a loser, fraudster, sexual predator, racist and should be held to account for his multiple crimes.
You only post tweets celebrating when he gets off lightly, or anti Biden stuff, or false equivalency, so you make it clear that you admire him. You seem to excuse his criminality.
The only thing you don’t do is admit it openly.
Perhaps you are just a tiny bit embarrassed that you love him so much?

 

[Stokey]

Here’s the difference, we post stuff mocking your hero, and calling out his unsuitability to be anywhere near the WH. We OPENLY admit we believe Trump is a loser, fraudster, sexual predator, racist and should be held to account for his multiple crimes.
You only post tweets celebrating when he gets off lightly, or anti Biden stuff, or false equivalency, so you make it clear that you admire him. You seem to excuse his criminality.
The only thing you don’t do is admit it openly.
Perhaps you are just a tiny bit embarrassed that you love him so much?

My interest isn't about Trump. I have said multiple times on here I didn't want himto run again.

My interest is more what I see as a weaponisation of the DOJ. There is no way this case would be tried if Trump didn't become President or wasn't running again. That means it is purely politically motivated.
Wath if Trump loses how all of these cases will magically be pleaded away as they are no longer neccessary.

I think it is a dangerous, short-sighted ploy that is only going to backfire and make the US weaker in the end. A weak US then has global implications.

But keep up the 'You love Trump' rhetoric. It is highly amusing and only highlights your limited thinking.

 

[OneGreatClub]

My interest isn't about Trump. I have said multiple times on here I didn't want himto run again.

My interest is more what I see as a weaponisation of the DOJ. There is no way this case would be tried if Trump didn't become President or wasn't running again. That means it is purely politically motivated.
Wath if Trump loses how all of these cases will magically be pleaded away as they are no longer neccessary.

I think it is a dangerous, short-sighted ploy that is only going to backfire and make the US weaker in the end. A weak US then has global implications.

But keep up the 'You love Trump' rhetoric. It is highly amusing and only highlights your limited thinking.

Ok . You love Trump.

 

[OneGreatClub]

 

[Stokey]

Ok . You love Trump.

You can do better.

 

[Stokey]

Hate or like Trump. This is crazy nonsense.

 

[BigTacoBandit]

My interest isn't about Trump. I have said multiple times on here I didn't want himto run again.

My interest is more what I see as a weaponisation of the DOJ. There is no way this case would be tried if Trump didn't become President or wasn't running again. That means it is purely politically motivated.
Wath if Trump loses how all of these cases will magically be pleaded away as they are no longer neccessary.

I think it is a dangerous, short-sighted ploy that is only going to backfire and make the US weaker in the end. A weak US then has global implications.

But keep up the 'You love Trump' rhetoric. It is highly amusing and only highlights your limited thinking.

If your interest is in the DOJ cases and you have no interest in Trump, why did you post a tweet about Trump's net worth rising due to the Truth Social listing?

That has nothing to do with any DOJ case.

 

[Stokey]

If your interest is in the DOJ cases and you have no interest in Trump, why did you post a tweet about Trump's net worth rising due to the Truth Social listing?

That has nothing to do with any DOJ case.

It points towards Trump's financial position and his ability to pay the $450m bond. How is that not relevant?

 

[GreyCrow]

My interest is more what I see as a weaponisation of the DOJ. There is no way this case would be tried if Trump didn't become President or wasn't running again. That means it is purely politically motivated.
Wath if Trump loses how all of these cases will magically be pleaded away as they are no longer neccessary.

Yes and no

I dont think its weaponisation of the DOJ - they cant prosecute unindictable charges. They found 91 - and reckon they could find more if so inclined

What I will agree is some - not all 91 - some of the charges would have gone away if Trump kept quiet and retired to play golf everyday ie the classified documents

He would still face charges but they would have been allowed to plead down - you know the 2 tiers of Justice in the USA .

But he challenged the courts and the prosecutors at every step of the way. Posting the rubbish he does I would go after him if he cant shut his mouth