Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: GWS Giants v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 65% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
AFLW 2024 - Round 3 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
KE is one of those stats where a high one is ok but really not that hard to hit due to its nature e.g. a 50m hacked bomb to a pack is effective.Gives it 120% but just makes too many mistakes.
7 turnovers and 40% kicking efficiency.
I don’t recall a player who turns an easy score situation into a nothing so easilyI don't think I can recall a player who slips over as much as him
The turnover where he took a couple of bounces and just had to get it out the back for what would have been a certain goal is possibly one of the worst turnovers that I have ever seen.Gives it 120% but just makes too many mistakes.
7 turnovers and 40% kicking efficiency.
The turnover where he took a couple of bounces and just had to get it out the back for what would have been a certain goal is possibly one of the worst turnovers that I have ever seen.
Yeah maybe. Has he improved over the last two years though? I mean if he is on the upwards curve then you might be correct.He's been pretty bad. In saying that, I actually believe he will end up good. He is 21.
I'm happy with his contract length but I think he will prove some wrong next year...
/Cuts to me calling for his head in round one
The question is though, is it delusional?I mean it's pretty much guaranteed they're seeing more than we do from the cheap seats
I don’t think he has. When he came to the club he looked like a genuine goal kicker who was pretty classy Kicking around his body. I see none of that in him anymore.Yeah maybe. Has he improved over the last two years though? I mean if he is on the upwards curve then you might be correct.
I’m speculating here but I wonder whether he could also be part of a bigger issue in that there could possibly be players who are looking at Jye’s output in said role and questioning why they aren’t getting game.Seems a shadow of the player he was last year, seems to be up the ground a lot more as opposed to being camped in the 50 last year.
Was also inexplicably made sub against West Coast after stringing 2 good games v GC and Carlton.
Whilst I think he's probably not up for it part of me wonders if he's another victim of our "learn a role" rather than "role for his strengths" mentality.
That’s on the coach to explain selection decisions, and I’m sure he is. If the players have an issue with a message along the lines of “hard work and following the game plan will get you picked irrespective of talent” then that’s an issue for the playersI’m speculating here but I wonder whether he could also be part of a bigger issue in that there could possibly be players who are looking at Jye’s output in said role and questioning why they aren’t getting game.
I reckon Nick Hind for all his faults could mount a pretty solid case. Apparently Archie Perkins now wants to play more as a forward after his experiment as a midfielder (rather than sitting on opposition mids).
If Archie can recapture his form he is a better option for the high half forward role I reckon.
They all did for 3 and a half quarters. Looked like we were busting our arses and they were just jogging around jn loads of space.Geezzzz he's horrible. My mate (dees fans) who came along said he's one of those players that looks like he's working his guts out, but for absolutely 0 return.
You mean like Shane Woewodin?Geezzzz he's horrible. My mate (dees fans) who came along said he's one of those players that looks like he's working his guts out, but for absolutely 0 return.
I played with a guy like that, his nickname was Autumn LeavesI don't think I can recall a player who slips over as much as him
The turnover where he took a couple of bounces and just had to get it out the back for what would have been a certain goal is possibly one of the worst turnovers that I have ever seen.
i might need to have a sneaky rewatch.Jake was partly at fault for that. He had acres of space and could have led at Menzie, but wanted it over the back. Made Menzie take an extra bounce that we didn't really need to do.
No?! Not Stringer!Jake was partly at fault for that. He had acres of space and could have led at Menzie, but wanted it over the back. Made Menzie take an extra bounce that we didn't really need to do.
I'm going to try this today if I can wrestle a remote off one of the kids. For research purposes.i might need to have a sneaky rewatch.