Play Nice 47th President of the United States: Donald Trump - Part 20: Here we go again!

[Gethelred]

Mod Notice
* Thread monitored actively. User who drag it down will be removed

Specifically: reference to TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome) and its counterpart 'Trumpanzee' or anything similar will no longer be allowed.

Personal attacks are also to be kept to a minimum.

Just a reminder, even if it hasn't come up for a few pages and y'all should know this stuff by now:

This thread is not about Covid, lockdowns, or vaccines. It is about Donald Trump. While Trump was in office during the pandemic and his response to Covid is relevant, there are pertinent threads for you to post your opinions on those things in.

It might also do with reminding a few that when you post on the SRP, you are responsible for backing up/verifying your claims to fact. What this means is that you will be asked time to time to support your claims with evidence, to ensure that this forum is as free of misinfomation as we can make it.

Do not post conspiracy theories on this forum. We have an entire other forum for that.

Thanks all.

As always, please submit ideas for the thread title by tagging Gethelred! We're looking for something new to match the new thread!

USA - 2024 US Presidential Election: Trump vs Harris (pt II)

Continued from Part 1 - https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/2024-us-presidential-election-trump-vs-harris.1383317/

www.bigfooty.com

USA - Kamala Harris Concedes. God Help America

www.bigfooty.com

< - Trump 19 is back there.

 

[Blue1980]

I'm calling it now - Moscow Marj will be running for president in the 2028 election. You can all quote my post in 4 years time.

I am thinking they will probably circle the wagons around JD Vance. They might need to turbo charge the voter suppresion stuff further though for him to win an election. Still no evidence Trumpism without Trump works on a national stage.

 

[MPMonkeys]

Researching impact on humans is reasonable.


Investigating whether this is directly causing children to be transgender or gay is absolutely unacceptable. An absurdity by someone who is secretary of health. It looks like he will spend his time misappropriating public funding on investigating his cooker conspiracy theories. He'll keep spending money too until he can find someone who vaguely agrees with him.

No legitimate investigation into health matters investigates a pre determined outcome.

Why isn’t it acceptable?
Science is about exploring why things are the way they are. I think it’s an interesting concept. Why are there more gay/transgender people in the US compared to say Ethiopia (I’ve just plucked that country out as a hypothetical).
Is it genetics, is it income related or is it just a coincidence or just plain unexplainable?
There may be things that come out of it that will prove useful later on.

 

[Blue1980]

the dems doing what you suggested would have been little more than something in name rather than of material effect. in any event, the joint is stuffed

To do that the dems would of had to have been pulling out all stops to try and win the election with a proper agenda to help the middle/working classes, rather than trimming around the edges.

They weren't doing that, so very hard to generate any passion in a passionless movement.

 

[Royces Hart]

Why are there more gay/transgender people in the US compared to say Ethiopia (I’ve just plucked that country out as a hypothetical).

Are there? Or is it just that in Ethiopia (or other hypothetical countries), gay and trans people are oppressed and unable to be open about their sexuality?

 

[iDon]

Nothing groundbreaking there.

From the article, some additives in water are known to impact frogs and he wants to research whether it impacts humans as well. Thats it. It would be negligent if this wasn’t examined.

Please tell me this is satire.

 

[Blue1980]

You lost me at ‘Neocon’.
Don’t really care what ‘online people’ think. It’s not relevant to what may or may not happen.

How did I lose you at Neocon? MAGA Republicans use it as a derogatory term for old "RINO" republicans and/or war hawks.

So not caring what I think is not caring what, well even many of those who support Trump think.

You are just showing again you're just a blind follower who can't criticise anything because either a) you don't know anything or b) you don't care and just think its fun if Trump is in charge to "own the libs"

 

[Anzacpaul]

Are there? Or is it just that in Ethiopia (or other hypothetical countries), gay and trans people are oppressed and unable to be open about their sexuality?

This is what makes me laugh about the "woke making teh kids trans" bs. People have been this way forever, it's just that we're at a time where it's more "accepted" (I use that term very loosely) instead of having to choke it down and hate themselves.

 

[JackOutback]

He will be judged by what he does, not what he says.

He hasn't so far, what makes you think it will happen now.

 

[Blue1980]

Are there? Or is it just that in Ethiopia (or other hypothetical countries), gay and trans people are oppressed and unable to be open about their sexuality?

We know its that, but apparently its cos of the water(?) or the gay/trans agenda (?) that makes people more gay/trans, or something.

May as well do a study into what chemicals cause left handedness.

 

[MPMonkeys]

Please tell me this is satire.

I'm not sure what is so earth-shattering about it.

 

[Zidane98]

Why isn’t it acceptable?
Science is about exploring why things are the way they are. I think it’s an interesting concept. Why are there more gay/transgender people in the US compared to say Ethiopia (I’ve just plucked that country out as a hypothetical).
Is it genetics, is it income related or is it just a coincidence or just plain unexplainable?
There may be things that come out of it that will prove useful later on.

You can't be serious. Surely.

 

[Blue1980]

He hasn't so far, what makes you think it will happen now.

He will be judged on the vibe from his supporters. Also for many of them its sunken cost fallacy, so no matter what he does, they will find a reason it is good.

 

[Farmer2Goggin]

the upside is he might just be destroying the joint in the process.

Hats off to Putin - he's managed to assemble an impressive array of useful idiots to run the USA while sitting on his arse in the Kremlin sipping Vodka

 

[Blue1980]

This is what makes me laugh about the "woke making teh kids trans" bs. People have been this way forever, it's just that we're at a time where it's more "accepted" (I use that term very loosely) instead of having to choke it down and hate themselves.

I still want to know how these people being themselves is detrimental to other peoples lives. Like they think people just become gay/trans for a lark, to be trendy or something. Like these people don't face prejeduce and their lives are more difficult even still (especially for trans people, more acceptance for gay people now, but still prejeduces exist).

 

[MPMonkeys]

We know its that, but apparently its cos of the water(?) or the gay/trans agenda (?) that makes people more gay/trans, or something.

May as well do a study into what chemicals cause left handedness.

No, it's not 'apparent' at all.
That's why its being researched.

As an aside, I think it would be interesting to understand why some people are left handed or right handed.

 

[Zidane98]

Why isn’t it acceptable?
Science is about exploring why things are the way they are. I think it’s an interesting concept. Why are there more gay/transgender people in the US compared to say Ethiopia (I’ve just plucked that country out as a hypothetical).
Is it genetics, is it income related or is it just a coincidence or just plain unexplainable?
There may be things that come out of it that will prove useful later on.

How about you go and do a study of what gay / transgender people think in Saudi Arabia and get back to us. I'm willing to bet you won't get anyone who is actually transgender or gay putting their hand up for the study.

 

[Blue1980]

How about you go and do a study of what gay / transgender people think in Saudi Arabia and get back to us. I'm willing to bet you won't get anyone who is actually transgender or gay putting their hand up for the study.

To him that would be proof we need to be more like Saudi Arabia. Or obviously differences in their water supply.

 

[MPMonkeys]

To him that would be proof we need to be more like Saudi Arabia. Or obviously differences in their water supply.

You have a bad habit of making 1+1=3.

This is the problem with the Left. As soon as you stick your head up above the echo chamber pulpit you are immediately accused of being racist, sexist, homophobic or whatever.

 

[Blue1980]

You have a bad habit of making 1+1=3.

This is the problem with the Left. As soon as you stick your head up above the echo chamber pulpit you are immediately accused of being racist, sexist, homophobic or whatever.

Stop playing the victim, you think studies on these things haven't been done before or continue to be done?

You make disingenuous arguments we can easily see through, and you claim it's "just asking questions".

RFK isn't going to magically find the answer, dude is just a crank.

 

[Zidane98]

You have a bad habit of making 1+1=3.

This is the problem with the Left. As soon as you stick your head up above the echo chamber pulpit you are immediately accused of being racist, sexist, homophobic or whatever.

Should our government commence a study into the water supply in your area possibly causing you to post stuff like this?

 

[MPMonkeys]

Should our government commence a study into the water supply in your area possibly causing you to post stuff like this?

I imagine they would be studying the water supply all the time. Again, negligent if they weren't.
Bit hard to take criticisms on science from people who think there are 32 genders or who can't define what a woman is.

 

[Blue1980]

I imagine they would be studying the water supply all the time. Again, negligent if they weren't.
Bit hard to take criticisms on science from people who think there are 32 genders or who can't define what a woman is.

You couldn't be more of a right wing caracature if you tried.

What is a woman haw haw haw, 32 genders haw haw haw, I identify as an attack helicopter etc etc

99%+ people identify as male or female, if people want to identify as something else I don't care, its a non issue.

The issues we have as a society are due to those at the very top hoovering up all the cash and power for themselves, not some marginalised groups who already have a hard time in life.

 

[MPMonkeys]

Stop playing the victim, you think studies on these things haven't been done before or continue to be done?

You make disingenuous arguments we can easily see through, and you claim it's "just asking questions".

RFK isn't going to magically find the answer, dude is just a crank.

I don't know.

He didn't say he was providing any answers. You are imagining him to be someone that he isn't.

 

[Zidane98]

I imagine they would be studying the water supply all the time. Again, negligent if they weren't.
Bit hard to take criticisms on science from people who think there are 32 genders or who can't define what a woman is.

Of course. They let the study results determine the conclusion though. They don't study a pre determined outcome. That's absolutely not how science works.

 

[Blue1980]

I don't know.

He didn't say he was providing any answers. You are imagining him to be someone that he isn't.

So he will do a study for what, his own personal amusement?

No the dude is a crank and a charlatan. He has no core beliefs or conviction on anything.