I would use that money to secure our young guns to long term contracts.
Has anyone intimated that $50K is holding us up from signing any of our array of young guns to long term deals?
We has a massive run into the finals off the back of three blokes showing up in our forward 50 every week - hansen one of them. If we lost him over a fraction more money and then tarrant blows a shoulder next year we're back to Petrie.
I'm a Hansen defender (who's had his ****ing patience tried for the last two years) - but Hamish and Pedo are asking to leave for more money, contract length and opportunity elsewhere.
We limit ourselves if they both go (which they have said they want to) and then we lose Hansen as well - not even taking into account the fact that I'd doubt we'll be adequately compensated.
And then add in that we'll have like 4 picks inside the top 50 or something at a time when picking up 4 kids to debut for us in three years time isn't good list management.