- Aug 6, 2021
- 10,696
- 30,913
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
It seems almost a fait accompli that Albanese will fund $600m for a PNG NRL team.
I don't follow rugby closely, though its clear many Papuans love the game, its their national sport, and they've produced great players to the NRL over many decades.
I do think I know a little bit about Australian politics and international relations though. I can see the merits of the investment within the lens of a broader geopolitical strategy that's concerned with matching Chinese govt companies expansion in the Pacific. I appreciate that its a novel use of AusGov's substantial aid budget for our closest neighbour. Also, there's probably a bit of an electoral benefit for the ALP in the traditionally conservative states of NSW and QLD.
But there's a lot about this proposal I don't understand. People around here talk about the difficulty Tassie would have attracting mainland talent for a footy team. It'd be significantly harder for PNG to attract any Australian or NZ talent and club staff. How viable can a PNG team be from a competitive perspective?
Also I wonder about the commercial viability. The current suggestion is $600m over 10 years, but I wonder how much more we'll be paying thereafter. How many Australians and Kiwis are likely to travel to Port Moresby for games? Last I checked we still needed visas to get to get there. Given the security concerns, how viable is it for there to be a permanent media presence during the season? After a decade, is there any realistic chance a team will be self-sufficient?
There's obviously a bit of bias in this post because like all of you I'm very invested in AFL. I do think the absence of an NT team is a great shame. A 20th team should be regarded as a priority for Canberra. It makes sense both from the perspective of socio-economic investment and as a recognition of the incredible contribution this heartland AFL community has made in our sport. I would have no problems backing an NT team as my second favourite after North, and would happily provide a bit of financial support too. But I can see that many of the competitive and commercial challenges would be similar.
In sum, I don't have any strong conclusions one way or the other just yet and I am genuinely curious how many people feel about either as a government priority.
‘Deal is done’: Decision on $600m NRL expansion set to be confirmed
‘Deal is done’: Decision on $600m NRL expansion set to be confirmed
www.foxsports.com.au
Federal government close to securing $600m deal for new Papua New Guinea NRL side
The federal government and the NRL are closing in on a deal worth up to $600 million to secure a new NRL side based in Papua New Guinea.
www.abc.net.au
I don't follow rugby closely, though its clear many Papuans love the game, its their national sport, and they've produced great players to the NRL over many decades.
I do think I know a little bit about Australian politics and international relations though. I can see the merits of the investment within the lens of a broader geopolitical strategy that's concerned with matching Chinese govt companies expansion in the Pacific. I appreciate that its a novel use of AusGov's substantial aid budget for our closest neighbour. Also, there's probably a bit of an electoral benefit for the ALP in the traditionally conservative states of NSW and QLD.
But there's a lot about this proposal I don't understand. People around here talk about the difficulty Tassie would have attracting mainland talent for a footy team. It'd be significantly harder for PNG to attract any Australian or NZ talent and club staff. How viable can a PNG team be from a competitive perspective?
Also I wonder about the commercial viability. The current suggestion is $600m over 10 years, but I wonder how much more we'll be paying thereafter. How many Australians and Kiwis are likely to travel to Port Moresby for games? Last I checked we still needed visas to get to get there. Given the security concerns, how viable is it for there to be a permanent media presence during the season? After a decade, is there any realistic chance a team will be self-sufficient?
There's obviously a bit of bias in this post because like all of you I'm very invested in AFL. I do think the absence of an NT team is a great shame. A 20th team should be regarded as a priority for Canberra. It makes sense both from the perspective of socio-economic investment and as a recognition of the incredible contribution this heartland AFL community has made in our sport. I would have no problems backing an NT team as my second favourite after North, and would happily provide a bit of financial support too. But I can see that many of the competitive and commercial challenges would be similar.
In sum, I don't have any strong conclusions one way or the other just yet and I am genuinely curious how many people feel about either as a government priority.