The Royal Sampler
Floreat Pica, Bitch!
But Dawes was already under contract? Seems a long bow to draw in his regard.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Says it all.
In Buck's/Hine we trust.
Go Pies.
Now let's see if we get a favorable draw.
For all movie related discussion mosey on over to the nest:
http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/the-movie-thread.978200/#post-26148577
It's been fun!
I posted this before they got bumped up. We did not get pick 19 from another club so it does not count as an 'in'.Aren't your first three picks 18,19 and 21? Add Lynch and Young and you've done very well.
Let it be done Q.
We really slaughtered it in this trade period, a ruthless trading operation.
Don't ever question the family again.
Yeah Getting 1st Rounders for Wellingham and Dawes and Then get Lynch and Young without trading anythingA fine trading period for the club, Wellers forced our hand and Chris decided he didn't like the heat in the kitchen. Neither player has been replaced like for like but both new acquisitions fill needs which were glaringly obvious this season.
Gleaning two first round picks in addition places us in a powerful position in the upcoming draft period, a position we haven't been in for years.
For a club that has finished in the top bracket for years now that is an outstanding acheivment.
Well done Hine / Rendell / Bucks / Walsh.
Nailed it.
Maybe we can trade for oneJust gotta fix that losing in grand finals problem
We've taken the piss the last few weeks.
Just a taste of what is to come where FA is concerned... I think we will find the only thing holding us back from pillaging every year will be the salary cap. It's a beautiful thing though, every time one of our highest paid players retires, or enters the back end of a front loaded contract, or can go on our vets list.... boom, snap up another player.
They will change the rules in a few years when they start looking back on it and seeing how much of an advantage it is to teams like ours.
Not sure what you are getting at to be honest but I don't have an issue with who we have picked up. Just with who we have lost. As I said they are 2 very seperate issues. Just like we never traded Paul Williams for Holland and Clement as some like to paint it. We let a gun go and we could have traded for Clemeent anyway. Holland was dime a dozen. 2 sperate issues.And given our wage constraints and the FA list of hopefuls, who could we have gotten in FA that would be a better couplet - keeping in mind Wellingham was headed out the door already?
How i see it -youve won on the Dawes deal and lost on the Wellingham trade.
Dawes -ive never seen a bloke drop as many chest marks as him -Lynch although older is clearly a better player and a far stronger mark -so your early pick for Dawes -and with Lynch coming in -a clear winner
But with Wellingham -i would have thought most Collingwood supporters would be bitterly dissappointed to lose him -and West Coast would be rapped to get him . Like if your recruiting a top line player -Wellingham ticks all the boxes -what is he about 24 or 25 played 90 odd games -a premiership player -a classy player who can play on ball or forward -but most importantly hes basically at the perfect age
It will basically come down to how well Collingwood use those 2 early picks. Richmond got 2 1st round picks for Brad Ottens -and picked 2 blokes they subsequently delisted