- Dec 27, 2016
- 29,644
- 62,184
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #2
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
The video on this page has an interview with the caretaker
He mentions a time 4am ??
And also seems to imitate/mime bending down and picking up a child and walking away with it, when in actual fact hes describing a scenario where a child walks off on her own... Little bit odd.
If this is the shack that had CCTV, that's absolutely incredible. Even if the camera is only on the back of the shack, facing the track behind it, it would still pick up everything. If it's in the front, facing the tent, that would be unbelievably lucky.
View attachment 1266584
He’s a bit inarticulate. Hiding something? lots of hand movements going all over the place. Interesting.
The video on this page has an interview with the caretaker
He mentions a time 4am ??
And also seems to imitate/mime bending down and picking up a child and walking away with it, when in actual fact hes describing a scenario where a child walks off on her own... Little bit odd.
I agree. I think if you’re stalking a child to abduct them there are probably easier ways than following a family all the way to a camp site and skulking around all night.Seems like a real big reach to me that someone might have stalked the family and then followed them to a camp site. imo police have nothing and are getting desperate for clues.
Yes, I think the person intended to take her. You’d have to have some sort of plan of what you’re going to do once you have her. Driving around randomly with a child with no idea of where you are going or what you’re doing, who is going to become extremely difficult, is not really something I can see someone doing. Also the abduction was seamless, which doesn’t suggest impulsive to me.At the risk of promoting a debate; a petty thief suddenly decides to abduct a child - OK, what then, take her to cash convertors..?
The video on this page has an interview with the caretaker
He mentions a time 4am ??
And also seems to imitate/mime bending down and picking up a child and walking away with it, when in actual fact hes describing a scenario where a child walks off on her own... Little bit odd.
I was going off the stalking commentary. For it to be stalking, had to be before they went away.It has not been stated when the break in occurred, but looking like it was only discovered when they went go home, so while they were away??
Maybe Ch9 got it wrong and he runs the Blowhole TuckerboxI don't think that is the caretaker?
Make sure to try to delicious food from the tucker box van located in the car park.
We shared the fish and chips and must say the freshness and flavour was fab ! our pack included fresh local whiting and mackerel, perfectly cooked and seasoned.
If it was mentioned by the family/known to police from the beginning, that makes more sense to me, because I couldn’t figure out why it would only be coming to light now. And if it was mentioned earlier then it sounds to me like making the break in out to be potentially evidence of stalking now just because police are searching the house is just media rubbish because if there was any merit the police would have been all over that much sooner.The interaction with police happened days before Cleo went missing. It was mentioned in a couple of articles when she first went missing, with the police declining to comment. Honestly it could have been about anything, but the timing is suspicious.
It would be pretty difficult for ESU to get in and bug that house without being seen in the days following news breaking. And they have to of flown up on VH WPY or VH WPQ. The only flight before today was last Sunday. Way too soon IMO. Besides which, forensics only fingerprinted the perimeter of their house, and didn't go inside. It's quite obvious from police actions that they're not suspecting the parents.In the case of BRist the authorities bugged the car, the house the everything whilst stating, if I remember BR was not a person of interest. I suspect a similar thing will be happening here.
So someone(s) might have been remotely monitoring this CCTV to get a good look at who was coming, going and staying, in real-time (live), from another location at the blow-holes or somewhere around the Carnarvon area within an hour or so's drive to the Quobba blow holes.If this is the shack that had CCTV, that's absolutely incredible. Even if the camera is only on the back of the shack, facing the track behind it, it would still pick up everything. If it's in the front, facing the tent
Great spot. If that’s the one with the CCTV that saw Cleo at the campsite then I assume it can see at least close to where the tent was because given the arrival time and described activities I don’t think she would have been far from the car or tent at any time between arrival and bedtime.If this is the shack that had CCTV, that's absolutely incredible. Even if the camera is only on the back of the shack, facing the track behind it, it would still pick up everything. If it's in the front, facing the tent, that would be unbelievably lucky.
View attachment 1266584
So someone(s) might have been remotely monitoring this CCTV to get a good look at who was coming, going and staying, in real-time (live), from another location at the blow-holes or somewhere around the Carnarvon area within an hour or so's drive to the Quobba blow holes.
How easy is it to hack in to a CCTV system?So someone(s) might have been remotely monitoring this CCTV to get a good look at who was coming, going and staying, in real-time (live), from another location at the blow-holes or somewhere around the Carnarvon area within an hour or so's drive to the Quobba blow holes.
if WiFi based and open network = very easyHow easy is it to hack in to a CCTV system?
Thanks. I actually wouldn’t put it past a person like that to remotely watch a camp area filled with children, whether for the purpose of abducting one or just as a creep with the abduction idea developing over time. It’s probably not what happened IMO, but I think it’s plausible. It would certainly explain how they came to target Cleo and grab her so brazenly.if WiFi based and open network = very easy
Maybe Bradley Robert Edwards can answer that better than I can.How easy is it to hack in to a CCTV system?