Yes, which is why we appear to be recruiting players to complement the new game style, as well as bringing in a new S&C coach to assist with implementing a new program to get the players in physical condition to be able to execute.
These thing take 3+ years to bear fruit. Bringing in a new coach, new fitness program, etc will only set the club back even further, as a new coach will want to overhaul everything, just one year after its already been overhauled.
Then, if you get rid of new people who've only had 1-2 pre seasons to show results, you're not going to be able to attract the 'best & brightest' from interstate, with the axe looming over them because the club lacks patience.
That's how you end up like Carlton/Essendon. Big clubs who have been irrelevant for over 20 years because they kept trying to rush things, which inevitably lead to bad appointments, continual staff turnover, division at board level, etc.
I'd rather the club, at the very least, give Simmo until the end of his current contract and see what the results of a new fitness program, game plan and recruitment strategy show after at least 2-3 seasons. Because if you put an inexperienced coach in charge right now, you're going to sack him in 2 years and the cycle will some repeat itself. You will then bleed talented interstate players, who eant to go back home due to the unrest at the club.
The players still appear to support Simmo, so unless he's lost them, then he may as well see out his contract.
Players always say and appear to support their coach.
The club would not be set back further getting a new coach, it would in fact get things moving in the right direction much quicker. New program < new message, new non negotiables, New world. No downside at all if thats the step they take.