- Jun 19, 2006
- 11,700
- 23,678
- AFL Club
- Geelong
NO! You mean the final outcome is what anyone with the slightest bit of logic could see from a mile away?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The only one they can muster anything is to tell further lies
Come out and say. No, no we didnt say anything about trading him because of him family situation next year.
Were happy to keep Treloar but we need to find some space in the cap for the future. Unfortunately one of our better players had to be considered in a move and we feel for us its best and him if that is Treloar.
They still end up between a rock and a hard place. If treloar decides to stay and force a payout, one way or another, they are not legally allowed to not pay him out. This looks liek a very strange situation. His salary is too high for another club to want to take him on. And his trade value is fairly low now. Interesting times.
I don't see why the AFL don't go down the path of the NBA & NFL where the contract is actually with the AFL not the club
thought it was a hearing and not the trial startingWhat happens to Treloar if Degoey is found guilty in 2 days time?
its even less than that.thought it was a hearing and not the trial starting
Does he improve the rebuild or slow it down? The club has decided on a pathway, does he fit their plans?Why wouldn’t North just take him on? Front end his contract... wouldn’t have to give up much in terms of picks...
You can still do a rebuild. One quality midfielder coming in would balance out the young kids you’ll have.Does he improve the rebuild or slow it down? The club has decided on a pathway, does he fit their plans?
Treloar wouldn't go to northWhy wouldn’t North just take him on? Front end his contract... wouldn’t have to give up much in terms of picks...
Such as?
We've only got 6 players, including Treloar, contracted past 2021. A lot of flexibility for the future as it is.
Why do people act like back/front ending is a surprising, scandalous thing? I would assume most multi-year deals are structured to have players get the most money during what should be their prime years, and also accommodate the list around them.
I really see this moreso as "the Pies would like to spend the money in a different way", than "OMG, cap squeeze, they don't know what they're doing, LOL!"
Its hard to know exactly what his salary is? is it 900k a year for the next 4 years?
Those comments will just to keep getting clubs interested. Obviously the pies would need to pay some of his cap. But for me Treloars probably a 6-700k footballer so its not exuberant. Richmond were prepared to pay that when he moved and just about all clubs wouldve jumped out that. Injuries start to come good for most from that 26-29 yr age. When the body seems its most stable.
He still has explosive speed, he probably needs a full PS to feel even more confident about his body. His kicking is probably not as bad as many are stating. Many mids struggle with disposal and thats mainly due to the extreme pressure players are under. His handball and short kicks are fine.
Treloar wouldn't go to north
He doesn’t really have the luxury of being too picky if the Pies want him gone and he won’t leave Victoria. Horrible situation.
He doesn’t really have the luxury of being too picky if the Pies want him gone and he won’t leave Victoria. Horrible situation.
He isn’t cheap, hence the conundrum.Id take him at the blues if we could het him relatively cheap
Why wouldn’t North just take him on? Front end his contract... wouldn’t have to give up much in terms of picks...
Brown for Treloar straight swap. Neither wanted at their current clubWhy wouldn’t North just take him on? Front end his contract... wouldn’t have to give up much in terms of picks...
Actually don't mind it.Brown for Treloar straight swap. Neither wanted at their current club