Jesus 75 pages of whinging and not one mention of what actually cost Geelong the game - Rhys Stanley in the ruck vs McEvoy.
no, Scott not putting Dangerfield in the guts earlier than what he did.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Jesus 75 pages of whinging and not one mention of what actually cost Geelong the game - Rhys Stanley in the ruck vs McEvoy.
Yes it probably does , even Geelong people know how at least two of them are treated anmd looked after, it happened at Geelong v Hawks last year too.Thought Kelly was pretty good?
Please try and remember this ridiculous 'holy trinity' bullshit annoys us as much as anyone.
Along with Barrett shittest going around
Is that like saying "Im not racist... but..." ?
"Here is a bunch of free kicks which should have been paid to Geelong. Oh, but Geelong got basically all the free kicks in the final quarter. Look over there, a unicorn !!!"
lol - favourites
Reigning premiers v hawks coming off a six day break
Hopefully it’s another good game
Is that like saying "Im not racist... but..." ?
"Here is a bunch of free kicks which should have been paid to Geelong. Oh, but Geelong got basically all the free kicks in the final quarter. Look over there, a unicorn !!!"
Is that like saying "Im not racist... but..." ?
"Here is a bunch of free kicks which should have been paid to Geelong. Oh, but Geelong got basically all the free kicks in the final quarter. Look over there, a unicorn !!!"
Jesus 75 pages of whinging and not one mention of what actually cost Geelong the game - Rhys Stanley in the ruck vs McEvoy.
Probably needed just to stand wherever McEvoy was going to hit it uncontested, usually to Mitchell.no, Scott not putting Dangerfield in the guts earlier than what he did.
no, Scott not putting Dangerfield in the guts earlier than what he did.
Rioli is a "one percenter"champion ( do you know what that means at all?) and is regaining fitness, he does things you people don't see. It means really that if you think he didn't do much you are not watching properly or you know absolutely nothing about football. I am serious. Like the half brains that knock Poppy and Roughy and there are a few pea brains that know stuff all as well.Agree he did little
Danger up forward still got us a couple of goals.
Stanley, though he did kick two, he got smashed.
Ya know I said to someone I was watching it with, when Roughead pushed Stanley out of the way easily, took it out of the ruck and kicked a point at the start of the last, that point could be handy...Danger up forward still got us a couple of goals.
Stanley, though he did kick two, he got smashed.
Probably needed just to stand wherever McEvoy was going to hit it uncontested, usually to Mitchell.
Good god we need a decent ruck man.
Big Boy was huge last week against Grundy too. Mitchell keeps stealing his Brownlow votes. Did it all last year too. McEvoy our clear 2nd best player behind Mitchell.
I know. Im in a juvenile mood. This is rare territory these days...Thought Kelly was pretty good?
Please try and remember this ridiculous 'holy trinity' bullshit annoys us as much as anyone.
Ya know I said to someone I was watching it with, when Roughead pushed Stanley out of the way easily, took it out of the ruck and kicked a point at the start of the last, that point could be handy...
Still can’t believe he effectively cost you Savage/Dunstan
Huge win
Probably needed just to stand wherever McEvoy was going to hit it uncontested, usually to Mitchell.
Good god we need a decent ruck man.
I know. Im in a juvenile mood. This is rare territory these days...
Kelly was good and Menzel was outstanding.
But there really are depth issues at Geelong. As there are at Hawthorn but we're not being touted as top 4 material.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Good game of footy, but Geelong lost when Dangerfield burnt Ablett going out of the centre in the dying minutes. With Ablett jr running past on his left Dangerfield opted to go himself and go long, but he turned it over. I won't say it lost Geelong the game, but they could have done with that extra opportunity to go forward cleanly. Just things I notice. Ablett was in the clear and would have did something with it. Difference between winning and losing.
I know. Im in a juvenile mood. This is rare territory these days...
Kelly was good and Menzel was outstanding.
But there really are depth issues at Geelong. As there are at Hawthorn but we're not being touted as top 4 material.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Guthrie's rubbish tumbling punt when he had other options in the final minute or so is what stuck out for me.
I'm not low enough to mention the umps but yeah he'll probably get his Hawthorn guernsey in the mail this week.Whens Razor get a guernsey?
View attachment 477898
View attachment 477899
SUMMARY
The role of the tagger will be under strong consideration from both coaches as stars Gary Ablett, Joel Selwood and Tom Mitchell lock horns after a combined 132 disposals in round one. While Collingwood coach Nathan Buckley refused to lock down on Mitchell, Cats coach Chris Scott says he has plans in place to stop the Hawthorn ball magnet after Mitchell's record-breaking 54 possessions in round one. Teammate Cyril Rioli passed the opening-round test after a late start to pre-season and is set to give the Cats' small defenders more headaches alongside Luke Breust (four goals). Harry Taylor's injury sees him join Lachie Henderson (knee), Andrew Mackie and Tom Lonergan (retirements) as key outs from Geelong's defensive unit since last year. The Hawks will be kept on their toes themselves, as a guy named Ablett is joined by Patrick Dangerfield and Joel Selwood for the first time. Last year Ablett had 37 and 36 disposals and kicked two goals in both games against the Hawks.
WHERE AND WHEN: MCG, Monday, April 2, 3.20pm AEST
TV AND RADIO: Click here for broadcast guide
LAST FIVE TIMES
R17, 2017: Geelong 13.10 (88) d Hawthorn 12.13 (85) at the MCG
R4, 2017: Geelong 20.14 (134) d Hawthorn 6.12 (48) at the MCG
QF, 2016: Geelong 12.13 (85) d Hawthorn 12.11 (83) at the MCG
R1, 2016: Geelong 18.8 (116) d Hawthorn 12.14 (86) at the MCG
R20, 2015: Hawthorn 19.7 (121) d Geelong 12.13 (85) at the MCG
THE SIX POINTS
1. Patrick Dangerfield put the Hawks to the sword in both Geelong wins against the Hawks last year. He picked up 27 disposals in round four, before kicking 5.6 in a match-winning three-vote performance in round 17.
2. Geelong was equal-second in round one for contested marks and sixth for marks inside 50 – thanks largely to Daniel Menzel's dominant display. The Hawks ranked 17th in the competition for contested marks, with six against the Pies.
3. The Cats were the competition's most efficient side going inside 50 in the opening round, managing 27 scoring shots from 41 entries – losing the count to Melbourne by 23. Their 66 per cent efficiency rate smashed the competition average of 43 per cent from the first week.
4. In four Easter Monday clashes from 2010-14, the average winning margin was just nine points. In the three encounters since, an average of 59 points has decided the blockbuster.
5. As Jeff Kennett returns to face the Cats for the first time in his second stint as Hawthorn president, his infamous 'Kennett Curse' still lingers. The Hawks lost their next 11 matches against Geelong after his post-2008 Grand Final comments questioned the Cats' mental state, including seven before his tenure ended in 2011.
6. Hawthorn ruckman Ben McEvoy has moved to his highest career ranking of 35th in the Schick AFL Player Ratings. McEvoy sits third for ruckmen in the competition behind Melbourne's Max Gawn and Kangaroo Todd Goldstein. Cat Zac Smith is seventh.
IT'S A BIG WEEK FOR …
Cat Mark Blicavs, as he takes the next step in his defensive development. Moved down back to counter the loss of Harry Taylor against the Demons, Blicavs will be called upon for another role on Jack Gunston or Jarryd Roughead.
PREDICTION: Geelong by 11 points.
The views in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of the AFL or its clubs