Who is Cam Ellis-Yolmen?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who is Cam Ellis-Yolmen?
Membrey was available.
Granted King is a big out and so is Steele, but I think Membrey is comfortably covered by Collingwoods defence.
Pies were missing Cameron and Cox in ruck against Marshall, in which Frampton held up admirably, and De Goey who on he’s day can torch any side. So apples for apples, the better side definitely won I think there’s no arguments from anyone here, Saints have shown significant gains and I’m sure all there supporters are enjoying the ride at the moment, if maybe only short and sweet, still enjoyable.
Rd 1 last year???Membrey 3 goals last game v Collingwood.
Missing the point champ. Membrey was available and not selected. Clearly they rate Caminiti higher. Now they can see who is better while Caminiti has a 4 week holidayMembrey 3 goals last game v Collingwood.
Nah 5 or 6 for the dog actMissing the point champ. Membrey was available and not selected. Clearly they rate Caminiti higher. Now they can see who is better while Caminiti has a 4 week holiday
Round 1 2022 Brownlow votes vs StK:Membrey 3 goals last game v Collingwood.
Very good Leb, this bloke is always obsessed with Pies match day threads.Round 1 2022 Brownlow votes vs StK:
3 votes - Pat Lipinski
2 votes - Jordan De Goey
Am I doing it right?
Missing the point champ. Membrey was available and not selected. Clearly they rate Caminiti higher. Now they can see who is better while Caminiti has a 4 week holiday
Round 1 2022 Brownlow votes vs StK:
3 votes - Pat Lipinski
2 votes - Jordan De Goey
Am I doing it right?
Once again, it doesn’t matter who started it, that’s not something that the MRO or the tribunal will care about. The only thing they care about is:The only one throwing cheap shots was Murphy while Caminiti had his back turned. Go watch the vision on First Crack. They were all in agreeance that it was Murphy who started it and If he doesn’t drop at the knees he doesn’t get concussed and it’s a non discussion. No way it’s more than 2 weeks.
Well it’s not severe. Medium at bestOnce again, it doesn’t matter who started it, that’s not something that the MRO or the tribunal will care about. The only thing they care about is:
Was it high contact?
Was it intentional?
Was the contact severe?
Given the answer to those questions are yes, yes, and severe, he doesn’t get less than 4.
Missing the point champ. Membrey was available and not selected. Clearly they rate Caminiti higher. Now they can see who is better while Caminiti has a 4 week holiday
An anti vaxxer that couldn't manage 50 games in 10 years at AFL level who now plays for a side that won 1 game last year and lost 17 in a farmers league. An opinion you should respectWho is Cam Ellis-Yolmen?
Pretty sure this is the public AFL board, not your private Collingwood one?good for you. Enjoy!!
Your the one on here banging on about Nick Daicos champ, enjoy Neales game, he played well, as did Nick tonight.
Now jog on back to the Lions board.
Lol, when a player gets concussed from a hit they always grade it as severe, you numpty.Well it’s not severe. Medium at best
Salty as!Congrats on your April premiership Collingwood.
It's a marathon and not a sprint.
We will keep our powder dry for September.
See you there and we will be at full strength then.
Point taken, but I am genuinely pretty impartial on here. The guys concussed right now due to a hit off the ball, this is exactly the time where I’d expect to see a hefty suspension.“Neutral” observer from a team we are playing next week
So what’s your purpose on this thread apart from obvious trolling?Pretty sure this is the public AFL board, not your private Collingwood one?
He ran off the ground mouthing off. If he had a fractured jaw then yes fair enough, grade it as severe. But what happened does not constitute severe you flipping bellend.Lol, when a player gets concussed from a hit they always grade it as severe, you numpty.
So the "dog shot with nothing to do with play" you mentioned was Murphy who threw the first strike for no reason yeah? And unfortunately for him his glass jaw couldn't handle the retaliation...I wish it worked that way, because Cripps would flip 90% of AFL midfielders on their heads - but it doesn’t
We play AFL, not Ice Hockey
Just means he leaves em standing!42 touches looks great from a distance, 6 contested and 1 tackle looks odd up close.
3 goals after knocking out one of our main defenders, hmm,Ross Lyon was laughing in the last quarter, we weren't even trying that hard and we still nearly beat Collingwood with that last quarter comeback.
Tonight was a fact finding mission for us, we didn't care that much if we won or lost, but we found out that we can beat Collingwood when it counts.
It does mate when it concerns concussion.He ran off the ground mouthing off. If he had a fractured jaw then yes fair enough, grade it as severe. But what happened does not constitute severe you bellend.
I’m not sure why it’s so difficult for you to understand AFL guidelines, but I’ll repeat it. Any hit from a player that causes concussion is graded as severe impact. It’s not something that’s up for debate, despite you thinking it is.He ran off the ground mouthing off. If he had a fractured jaw then yes fair enough, grade it as severe. But what happened does not constitute severe you bellend.
Main defenders?! Haha what a stretch. If Murphy didn’t have a glass jaw know one would know who the weak prick was.3 goals after knocking out one of our main defenders, hmm,