Recommitted Andrew Gaff [re-signed]

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

Get nothing for Gaff next year?o_O

How did that go for the Crows and Dangerfield?

Gaff is a RFA so the Eagles can force a trade negotiation next season.

At worse they get a band 2 compo pick end of the 1st round.
Isn't there going to be no such thing as RFA as of next year?
 
I wasn't highlighting any teams with good currency, just that it was unlikely he'd be traded unless it was a great deal.

Not sure a second round pick and an ordinary player in Hartung would get it done to be honest.

Hartung and next years first maybe.

Overs, wont happen.

I ruffled some serious feathers on the Hawks board for suggesting Hartung and 32 was unders for a contracted Gaff. :$

That is slightly unders. I don't rate Hartung that much, funny because I just said above that Hartung and next years 1st round is overs.

I guess in summary Hartung + 20-25 is about right.

Can get Gaff for nothing next year, so whats 1 extra year of Gaff worth ?

Its not 2003 anymore. older players have much less trade value.

Gaff's hardly old, he's 25.
 
Concracted for one year wants to come home deal now or get nothing next year. Name the gws rejects turning your club around noting you your club has the longest gf drought

Man, he is a restricted free agent. If they decide not to match next year then they will most likely get a first round compensation in a stacked 2018 draft. Look at it from both sides brother.

Gaff is clearly worth a pick 8 - 15. He is 25 and entering his prime, he already is a b&f winner (in a grand-final year), All-Australian and in the top 5 wingers in the competition the past 3 years. Any club would be stoked if they picked up a kid with pick 10 that can match that.

Anyhow, it's been reported Hawthorn and St. Kilda have made enquires, but the Eagles have flatly turned it down. Evidently he is happy to play out 2017 before looking at RFA in 2018.
 
Last edited:
Be honest. You came to the Hawk Board and argued that Gaff was worth Pick 5-10.

How dare he go to your board and argue truth?
 
Overs, wont happen.



That is slightly unders. I don't rate Hartung that much, funny because I just said above that Hartung and next years 1st round is overs.

I guess in summary Hartung + 20-25 is about right.



Gaff's hardly old, he's 25.

You genuinely believe that a fringe Hawks best 22 player (a side that is pretty shit right now) and pick 32 is overs for a top 5 player at the Eagles who is arguably the best winger in the comp, contracted and only 25?
 
You genuinely believe that a fringe Hawks best 22 player (a side that is pretty shit right now) and pick 32 is overs for a top 5 player at the Eagles who is arguably the best winger in the comp, contracted and only 25?

I said Hartung + next years first is overs, I said Hartung + 32 is unders....

Hartung + 18-25 is about right.... If Gaff wants to leaves next year through free agency you will get end of 1st round compo.... you're basically getting that + Hartung for letting him go a year earlier.... Makes sense if he wants to head back to Melbourne.
 
I said Hartung + next years first is overs, I said Hartung + 32 is unders....

Hartung + 18-25 is about right.... If Gaff wants to leaves next year through free agency you will get end of 1st round compo.... you're basically getting that + Hartung for letting him go a year earlier.... Makes sense if he wants to head back to Melbourne.

Which is what I meant (just started my coffee).

Your first next year and Hartung is not overs. It's actually unders considering what your first rounder could be next year, why would we risk that? He is worth a pick between 5-10 and a sweetener in our favour.

Hartung isn't a good player. Not sure why he has suddenly become a gun.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I said Hartung + next years first is overs, I said Hartung + 32 is unders....

Hartung + 18-25 is about right.... If Gaff wants to leaves next year through free agency you will get end of 1st round compo.... you're basically getting that + Hartung for letting him go a year earlier.... Makes sense if he wants to head back to Melbourne.
Hartung's a grub.
 
Everyone knows that we would match band 2. So I think it's pretty clear that Hawks would make sure it's band 1.

I can't work out if Hawks fans in this thread are trolling, or just trolling themselves.

Just look at what known troll Abasi is saying.
 
Which is what I meant (just started my coffee).

Your first next year and Hartung is not overs. It's actually unders considering what your first rounder could be next year, why would we risk that? He is worth a pick between 5-10 and a sweetener in our favour.

Hartung isn't a good player. Not sure why he has suddenly become a gun.

Our first next year will realistically and probably be somewhere between 8-14 cant see much deviation out of that.... Only on the top end of that (say 14) + Hartung would I say it could work, we aren't going to risk having another shitty year and losing pick 8 AND Hartung, Especially considering we can just wait it out and get him as a free agent, keep our pick and Hartung. Realistically you guys are probably in a position where Hartung + 20-25 is a good deal due to FA.

I agree Hartung isnt THAT good but apparently you guys are interested in him, he definitely has potential and a decent ceiling.


Hartung's a grub.

Cool input guy :thumbsu:
 
Our first next year will realistically and probably be somewhere between 8-14 cant see much deviation out of that.... Only on the top end of that (say 14) + Hartung would I say it could work, we aren't going to risk having another shitty year and losing pick 8 AND Hartung, Especially considering we can just wait it out and get him as a free agent, keep our pick and Hartung. Realistically you guys are probably in a position where Hartung + 20-25 is a good deal due to FA.

I agree Hartung isnt THAT good but apparently you guys are interested in him, he definitely has potential and a decent ceiling.




Cool input guy :thumbsu:

You're absolutely delusional.

Hartung and a pick in the 20s is a shocking deal. You won't get him for free, we'll match any offer and force a trade.

Again, Hartung isn't a good player.
 
Our first next year will realistically and probably be somewhere between 8-14 cant see much deviation out of that.... Only on the top end of that (say 14) + Hartung would I say it could work, we aren't going to risk having another shitty year and losing pick 8 AND Hartung, Especially considering we can just wait it out and get him as a free agent, keep our pick and Hartung. Realistically you guys are probably in a position where Hartung + 20-25 is a good deal due to FA.

I agree Hartung isnt THAT good but apparently you guys are interested in him, he definitely has potential and a decent ceiling.




Cool input guy :thumbsu:
You'll need a top 10 pick.

Next years first might get it done but since he's contracted I'd say WC will want more.
 
You'll need a top 10 pick.

Next years first might get it done but since he's contracted I'd say WC will want more.

Damn straight.

It's all pointless chatter anyway, he doesn't want to leave and we don't want to lose him.
 
You're absolutely delusional.

Hartung and a pick in the 20s is a shocking deal. You won't get him for free, we'll match any offer and force a trade.

Again, Hartung isn't a good player.

You realise discussing potential trades on bigfooty is just that, don't get your knickers in a knot over it....
A trade could be worked out I believe and it will involve Hartung and a suitable pick (maybe another player too), it definitely however wont involve our 2018 1st.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Recommitted Andrew Gaff [re-signed]

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top