Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
If eagles know they would get a first round pick compo for gaff as a free agent why would they trade him now for something equal to that and miss out on the opportunity he may stay?
Isn't there going to be no such thing as RFA as of next year?Get nothing for Gaff next year?
How did that go for the Crows and Dangerfield?
Gaff is a RFA so the Eagles can force a trade negotiation next season.
At worse they get a band 2 compo pick end of the 1st round.
It's even more disgusting that freo fans think we respect their opinion. Little people.The sense of entitlement and smugness of Hawthorn is disgusting. If Gaff goes anywhere I hope it's not to the wees and poos.
Gaff for pick 8 and a third rounder is about right.
I wasn't highlighting any teams with good currency, just that it was unlikely he'd be traded unless it was a great deal.
Not sure a second round pick and an ordinary player in Hartung would get it done to be honest.
Hartung and next years first maybe.
I ruffled some serious feathers on the Hawks board for suggesting Hartung and 32 was unders for a contracted Gaff.
Can get Gaff for nothing next year, so whats 1 extra year of Gaff worth ?
Its not 2003 anymore. older players have much less trade value.
Bloody school holidays.The sense of entitlement and smugness of Hawthorn is disgusting. If Gaff goes anywhere I hope it's not to the wees and poos.
Gaff for pick 8 and a third rounder is about right.
Concracted for one year wants to come home deal now or get nothing next year. Name the gws rejects turning your club around noting you your club has the longest gf drought
Be honest. You came to the Hawk Board and argued that Gaff was worth Pick 5-10.
Overs, wont happen.
That is slightly unders. I don't rate Hartung that much, funny because I just said above that Hartung and next years 1st round is overs.
I guess in summary Hartung + 20-25 is about right.
Gaff's hardly old, he's 25.
You genuinely believe that a fringe Hawks best 22 player (a side that is pretty shit right now) and pick 32 is overs for a top 5 player at the Eagles who is arguably the best winger in the comp, contracted and only 25?
I said Hartung + next years first is overs, I said Hartung + 32 is unders....
Hartung + 18-25 is about right.... If Gaff wants to leaves next year through free agency you will get end of 1st round compo.... you're basically getting that + Hartung for letting him go a year earlier.... Makes sense if he wants to head back to Melbourne.
Hartung's a grub.I said Hartung + next years first is overs, I said Hartung + 32 is unders....
Hartung + 18-25 is about right.... If Gaff wants to leaves next year through free agency you will get end of 1st round compo.... you're basically getting that + Hartung for letting him go a year earlier.... Makes sense if he wants to head back to Melbourne.
Everyone knows that we would match band 2. So I think it's pretty clear that Hawks would make sure it's band 1.
I can't work out if Hawks fans in this thread are trolling, or just trolling themselves.
4 years!How dare he go to your board and argue truth?
4 years!
Which is what I meant (just started my coffee).
Your first next year and Hartung is not overs. It's actually unders considering what your first rounder could be next year, why would we risk that? He is worth a pick between 5-10 and a sweetener in our favour.
Hartung isn't a good player. Not sure why he has suddenly become a gun.
Hartung's a grub.
Our first next year will realistically and probably be somewhere between 8-14 cant see much deviation out of that.... Only on the top end of that (say 14) + Hartung would I say it could work, we aren't going to risk having another shitty year and losing pick 8 AND Hartung, Especially considering we can just wait it out and get him as a free agent, keep our pick and Hartung. Realistically you guys are probably in a position where Hartung + 20-25 is a good deal due to FA.
I agree Hartung isnt THAT good but apparently you guys are interested in him, he definitely has potential and a decent ceiling.
Cool input guy
You'll need a top 10 pick.Our first next year will realistically and probably be somewhere between 8-14 cant see much deviation out of that.... Only on the top end of that (say 14) + Hartung would I say it could work, we aren't going to risk having another shitty year and losing pick 8 AND Hartung, Especially considering we can just wait it out and get him as a free agent, keep our pick and Hartung. Realistically you guys are probably in a position where Hartung + 20-25 is a good deal due to FA.
I agree Hartung isnt THAT good but apparently you guys are interested in him, he definitely has potential and a decent ceiling.
Cool input guy
You'll need a top 10 pick.
Next years first might get it done but since he's contracted I'd say WC will want more.
You're absolutely delusional.
Hartung and a pick in the 20s is a shocking deal. You won't get him for free, we'll match any offer and force a trade.
Again, Hartung isn't a good player.
PROMOTED!!Announcing your mental age?
Not as grubby as MotlopHartung's a grub.