Mosques seem to be filled with people with darker complexions. Does that offend you?I noticed that. I saw pictures of about 40 white males between 30 and 50 and 2 asian women.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Mosques seem to be filled with people with darker complexions. Does that offend you?I noticed that. I saw pictures of about 40 white males between 30 and 50 and 2 asian women.
I'm fully supportive of women having an abortion for whatever reason they want. Its their body, if they don't want to have the baby in there, its their business. If you disagree, then find a way yourself to bring the foetus to term.It's the dishonesty around the subject that I abhor. The vast majority of abortions are for convenience. That's a fact. Yet rape and incest or the life of the mother being at risk are constantly thrown up. These are very rare and extreme examples. This in itself tells me those who support it have a sense that they are on shaky ground focusing on the overwhelmingly most common reason for it. So other than rape, incest or a mum's life being in danger you oppose abortion? If not, why go to the outliers?
What is this "type of issue"?Not sure I said child support. I said these type of issues…
It's surface level because sex education is pretty simple.
I don't know how else to explain how men can easily avoid the responsibility of children if they don't want it.
I have read the bit where God kills the first born kids in the passover.
That seems pretty intense. God doesn't seem like a nice guy.
I think I like that satan bloke better.
Says the homphobe.Says the anti Christian bigot.
It's not their body. It's the baby's body being removed and killed. As Chapelle says, that argument might be acceptable if it ran both ways. When the woman wants to abort he has no say but if she decides to keep it he is expected to financially support the child he may not want ! Can he say my wallet my choice! No. The government forces him to cough up. That is a blatant double standard.I'm fully supportive of women having an abortion for whatever reason they want. Its their body, if they don't want to have the baby in there, its their business. If you disagree, then find a way yourself to bring the foetus to term.
“(Insert)phobe”Says the homphobe.
Domie doesn't limit himself to homophobia. He's a Renaissance man of bigotry. Ask him about women actually having it better than men, or POCSays the homphobe.
But you defend homophobic churches?How dare you presume to know what I think about my gay friends? Have you been interviewed on Joy FM by your good mate? I have.
It's not their body. It's the baby's body being removed and killed. As Chapelle says, that argument might be acceptable if it ran both ways. When the woman wants to abort he has no say but if she decides to keep it he is expected to financially support the child he may not want ! Can he say my wallet my choice! No. The government forces him to cough up. That is a blatant double standard.
I forgot that you think "I'm not a racist/homophobe, I have black/gay friends" is a good lineHow dare you presume to know what I think about my gay friends? Have you been interviewed on Joy FM by your good mate? I have.
“(Insert)phobe”
The fallback position for those who have no factual argument.
Nope. Not a double standard. People are allowed to make medical decisions about their own body. As a man its the risk you take when you deposit sperm.It's not their body. It's the baby's body being removed and killed. As Chapelle says, that argument might be acceptable if it ran both ways. When the woman wants to abort he has no say but if she decides to keep it he is expected to financially support the child he may not want ! Can he say my wallet my choice! No. The government forces him to cough up. That is a blatant double standard.
How’s your math?…
View attachment 1526585
So you want abortions available, for men that don't want kids?
Thats your solution?
And that is 5 in 8 how?How’s your math?…
View attachment 1526585
It's always those who think calling out racism or homophobia is meaningless who use the most vapid vernacular.As opposed to people who use the word “woke” as a substitute for an argument.
Women do have it better than men.Domie doesn't limit himself to homophobia. He's a Renaissance man of bigotry. Ask him about women actually having it better than men, or POC
Not necessarily - you are certainly an idiot though, if you believe thatWomen do have it better than men.
Don’t bother. I know, I know. “Misogynist, sexist, femalephobe”
It’s the “woke” who make up words, Knight.As opposed to people who use the word “woke” as a substitute for an argument.
You called me an anti-christian bigot for criticizing homophobia in religion. How is that bigoted.“(Insert)phobe”
The fallback position for those who have no factual argument.
It's not their body. It's the baby's body being removed and killed. As Chapelle says, that argument might be acceptable if it ran both ways. When the woman wants to abort he has no say but if she decides to keep it he is expected to financially support the child he may not want ! Can he say my wallet my choice! No. The government forces him to cough up. That is a blatant double standard.
What words are made up?It’s the “woke” who make up words, Knight.