And I was asking about publishing his opinion without letting on that he stands to personally gain from Tesla stock rising.Well, Musk's view is news because he is CEO. Stating he is CEO and owns a ton of Tesla stock is reporting uncritically.
Not considering the CSIRO and the LNPs costing people to be equally weighted authorities does not equate to what you've written, though. And a journalist can address the LNPs arguments with fact checking like this 9 Fairfax article does:"Many other organisations this publication spoke to agreed with the CSIRO's view" - standing reporting in long-time accepted journalistic standards
"LNPs costings and their consultants who provided them are rubbish" - the sort of stuff I'd expect from anonymous polemicists like Ronni Salt.
https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/po...n-renewables-is-he-right-20241210-p5kx7f.html
Did I give you the impression I was some sort of government media advisor who actually wants to make the effort to change the media landscape? I have other things I'd rather do with my life than spending my time convincing the Australian consumer to change their behaviour.If you want to change this in an enduring way, you need to find a way to make consumers change their behaviour in a way that doesn't make them feel like they are being made to change or being made to eat their vegetables. Easier that this? Complaining on a web forum about the media.
We're all here giving our opinions on a Web forum, including yourself, so it's kinda weird to have a go at people for that. Besides, the point I was making wasn't to complain about the media, but saying that Labor and its supporters shouldn't complain about the media if they're not willing to do something about it. Unlike me, Labor MPs can actually propose laws to change the media landscape if they want.