Australian cheating at Newlands, where to from here?

Remove this Banner Ad

Lol I bet you blokes are the exact kind of people to take the piss out of Women's Day magazines and others of that ilk but you're basically talking about the same damn shit as they do

I find Women’s Day a very underrated magazine with many intriguing think pieces
 
Is Candice Warner probably seeing an opportunity to get her face on tv? Maybe/yes.

Does she deserve the attention of the first test, or the attention of this thread? No, she doesn't.

At best, you're giving her the attention she wants. At worst, it's probably sexist bullshit.
 
Is Candice Warner probably seeing an opportunity to get her face on tv? Maybe/yes.

Does she deserve the attention of the first test, or the attention of this thread? No, she doesn't.

At best, you're giving her the attention she wants. At worst, it's probably sexist bullshit.

Sexist? Pfft. If either he or she are selling stories to trashy mags I have the same opinion of both.

Of course she didn’t deserve the direct abuse at her, but I can see through a cynical ploy to get sympathy for her which in turn they hope will rub off on Dave.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Sexist? Pfft. If either he or she are selling stories to trashy mags I have the same opinion of both.

Of course she didn’t deserve the direct abuse at her, but I can see through a cynical ploy to get sympathy for her which in turn they hope will rub off on Dave.

The last line of my post was, in hindsight, overly trite.

What I meant to say is that if the people being critical of her are correct about her motivations, they're giving her the attention that she wants.

If they're not right though - if she's genuinely upset and blaming herself for her husbands failings, and if "we" are effectively calling her an attention-seeking gold digger - then yes, that would constitute sexism, because no one would level the same accusation toward a male in the same situation.
 
The last line of my post was, in hindsight, overly trite.

What I meant to say is that if the people being critical of her are correct about her motivations, they're giving her the attention that she wants.

If they're not right though - if she's genuinely upset and blaming herself for her husbands failings, and if "we" are effectively calling her an attention-seeking gold digger - then yes, that would constitute sexism, because no one would level the same accusation toward a male in the same situation.
Please, Candice has nothing to do with the Aussies ball tampering, which have been ongoing since well before this series, as have all other test teams.
 
Fast losing respect for Smith how can he be unaware of what was going on?

The whole team was involved in this shocking.

Bunch of cheats.
 
Incorrect.
He whacked a bloke several times who had clearly surrendered.
Not a hero, a typical street bully bogan coward is Ben Stokes.

What about the drunken thugs harrassing two gay men?

I suppose you excuse the behaviour of the person he punched, then?

The typical street bully bogan was the guy Stokes hit. He was the one harassing the people minding their own business.

This is a screwed up society where a villian then becomes a victim. Society, including you, are too quick to make excuses for wrongdoers.
 
Are you serious ?
What if he had killed one of them ? Still ok is it ?

Well, the dickhead shouldn't have harassed those people, causing Stokes to intervene?

Let's get this straight. This isn't some drunken brawl between a cricketer and a patron at a bar. This is someone seeing others being bullied, and standing up for them. He should be commended for doing something, not suspended.

This is why crime is so rampant. No-one is allowed to stand up for anyone else anymore. People will sit back and watch one person bash another, because they are too afraid of it happening to them, or being sued by the person doing the bashing.

Then civil liberatians like you come along, and criticise anyone standing up for what is right. People should be allowed to walk somewhere without being hassled.

I suppose you are one of those who also criticise police for how they handle bullies like this, and make excuses for losers who commit crimes, like they had some bad childhood or something.

You must love living in Daniel Andrews' Victoria.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

What about the drunken thugs harrassing two gay men?

I suppose you excuse the behaviour of the person he punched, then?

The typical street bully bogan was the guy Stokes hit. He was the one harassing the people minding their own business.

This is a screwed up society where a villian then becomes a victim. Society, including you, are too quick to make excuses for wrongdoers.
You aren't getting much support on this issue mate.
And rightly so.
He is a thug, a vicious thug, who deserves jail time and a lengthy suspension.
2 year minimum.
 
Well, the dickhead shouldn't have harassed those people, causing Stokes to intervene?

Let's get this straight. This isn't some drunken brawl between a cricketer and a patron at a bar. This is someone seeing others being bullied, and standing up for them. He should be commended for doing something, not suspended.

This is why crime is so rampant. No-one is allowed to stand up for anyone else anymore. People will sit back and watch one person bash another, because they are too afraid of it happening to them, or being sued by the person doing the bashing.

Then civil liberatians like you come along, and criticise anyone standing up for what is right. People should be allowed to walk somewhere without being hassled.

I suppose you are one of those who also criticise police for how they handle bullies like this, and make excuses for losers who commit crimes, like they had some bad childhood or something.

You must love living in Daniel Andrews' Victoria.
Think you should re visit the footage, then apologise to this poster.
If you defend that, well, that says as much about your as it does about Mr King Hit Stokes.
 
Well, the dickhead shouldn't have harassed those people, causing Stokes to intervene?

Let's get this straight. This isn't some drunken brawl between a cricketer and a patron at a bar. This is someone seeing others being bullied, and standing up for them. He should be commended for doing something, not suspended.

This is why crime is so rampant. No-one is allowed to stand up for anyone else anymore. People will sit back and watch one person bash another, because they are too afraid of it happening to them, or being sued by the person doing the bashing.

Then civil liberatians like you come along, and criticise anyone standing up for what is right. People should be allowed to walk somewhere without being hassled.

I suppose you are one of those who also criticise police for how they handle bullies like this, and make excuses for losers who commit crimes, like they had some bad childhood or something.

You must love living in Daniel Andrews' Victoria.
Pathetic post. Stokes story sounds like total bullshit, but even if he was standing up for someone there is a way to do it without nearly killing someone. Wake up to yourself.
 
I saw this on Facebook.

It seems appropriate to this discussion. :)

29789897_949609741865994_8455647031735196395_n.jpg
 
Well, the dickhead shouldn't have harassed those people, causing Stokes to intervene?

Let's get this straight. This isn't some drunken brawl between a cricketer and a patron at a bar. This is someone seeing others being bullied, and standing up for them. He should be commended for doing something, not suspended.

This is why crime is so rampant. No-one is allowed to stand up for anyone else anymore. People will sit back and watch one person bash another, because they are too afraid of it happening to them, or being sued by the person doing the bashing.

Then civil liberatians like you come along, and criticise anyone standing up for what is right. People should be allowed to walk somewhere without being hassled.

I suppose you are one of those who also criticise police for how they handle bullies like this, and make excuses for losers who commit crimes, like they had some bad childhood or something.

You must love living in Daniel Andrews' Victoria.

Why don't you give him a medal of honour? Then after that you can visit every one punch attacker in the country and hand out certificates of achievement.
 
Why don't you give him a medal of honour? Then after that you can visit every one punch attacker in the country and hand out certificates of achievement.

Relax matey. Stokes' wasn't a one punch coward hit. He hit him at least 10 times & the DH deserved every one of them.
 
The cheating was bad enough. but now we have to watch men CRYING over being caught in the act?
THAT is un-Australian
Glad Keith Miller is not around to see this!
Keith Miller was lucky not to be alive in the days of the internet
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Australian cheating at Newlands, where to from here?

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top