Having just finished watching, there was one clear difference between the 2 teams. Our delivery into F50 (together with our decision making in this section of the ground). We haven't played well since we beat the Giants IMO.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
O
One word why not - Hawthorn - smashing all comers
Both our 2008 and 1997 sides were about to hit their primes. We're nowhere near it now.I don't think so. Think back to 2008 or even way back to 1997, nobody really gave us a chance in either season, but we defied expectations. Yes, we're young, but like the coach said, there's no ceiling, so why not aim high?
Love for you to be right mate but I think we will struggle to win 2-3 more this year.Nope. The Flag Will Wag.
Why Not Now? Why Not Us? etc etc
Not even kidding.
there is probably something there that we don't know, I was a bit surprised that we changed a winning side quite a bitSo annoyed that Talia didn't play today. He could have played on Hawkins and allowed Roughead to continue his good form in the ruck. Grrrrrr!!!!!
The white one with the Bulldog logo is a training jumper.On the guernsey, why aren't we wearing the white one with the new Bulldog logo? It would have been ideal yesterday. The red one and the red shorts are rubbish.
And ... the reaction by most 'supporters' after a loss is just as irritating, even acknowledging that every other slub's supporters do the same.In all seriousness, people are reacting the same they do on every other board after a loss
go look
No better or worse a performance than recent weeks in a lot of ways, the only difference being the result. We were due and finally got rolled for not playing to our best. Still a huge chance with 2 minutes to go if we could have managed to get the ball in the right hands and show a bit of poise. Not too worried but obviously it is disappointing to not get the points.
Geelong outmatched us all day and roved the packs well. Our tackling was poor. None played terribly, but none played terribly well either. Motlop's couple of goals the difference IMO.
Excellent! Thank youBusy first quarter. Very quiet in the second but came back into it in the second half.
He is listed as only (!) 78.9% DE for his 9 kicks and 10 HBs but it just seemed every time he had the ball he thought his way through it - what was the best thing to do with it? Most of the time it was not just an effective disposal but one that put the recipient into a position where he had an even better chance at an effective disposal, i.e. to launch an attack. He is listed as having 5 CPs and 13 UPs (that's only 18 - not sure where his 19th "P" came from!) but he was regularly working in the guts, so even with a UP he was usually delivering it under pressure.
For a comparison, the sort of thought/execution that goes into his disposal is characteristic of Stevey J when he has space. If he can regularly deliver like that he'll be great value for us. His 19 disposals were worth maybe 25 from most other players.
On the negative side he missed a few tackles according to the Game Day thread (I missed seeing that but I'll believe it).
He also failed to record any HOs.
But to finish on a positive: on a day when we only kicked 9 goals he is credited with 2 GAs. (5 others in the side had 1 GA, no-one else had 2).
All in all, a pretty handy outing for a 19yo third gamer. (Copying in footy4ever who was interested in CD's progress)
Really disappointing to let a great opportunity slip. We had a chance to have a rare win down at Geelong and to shore up our ladder position, but didn't take it.
Simply too many players that are far from established in either the team or even their positions to ensure a win even against what was pretty mediocre opposition.
The white one with the Bulldog logo is a training jumper.
The match day guernseys all feature the plain hoops (as it should be), and we have to wear each at least once a year.
I agree though, the red kit is horrendous.
I'd say our draftees from last year dale Daniel Webb and McLean are by far the best at delivering the ball inside our 50, thank **** we recruited skillfull players last draftProbably the best kick into a leading F50 target is Stringer. Unfortunately can't have him up the field when he is also the best in front of goal. Maybe put Crameri deep and bring Stringer up the ground for a try. Crameri as a mid doesn't work.
This......We really need to snap out of this shit patch. If we beat Collingwood next week, we will be overwhelmingly likely to make the 8. But if we lose, we might find ourselves on a nasty slide.
Him and Roberts out. ??????????So annoyed that Talia didn't play today. He could have played on Hawkins and allowed Roughead to continue his good form in the ruck. Grrrrrr!!!!!
Agreed. Gather this is a chance to look and see if there's anything missed with him that wasn't already plainly obvious. If he's on the list next year in any other form than as a rookie I'd be surprised and disappointed. Unsure of his contract status but his spot is wasted on the primary list.I can't see Prudden making it he's too slow and doesn't seem to have any real strengths other than being a neat kick. There's not really a spot for him in the midfield with slower types such as Macrae, Stevens, Wallis and eventually Libba already in there. I would rather see the classy young players such as Daniel, Webb, McLean and Dale move through the midfield first.
Last years draft was a good step in bringing in more class hopefully there's more of it this year, when Daniel had the ball yesterday things happened.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk