- Moderator
- #1,326
He and hird have got the band back together down the borough, how tight do the VFL monitor WADA and salary caps I wonder...This make Dodo a sad panda.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
He and hird have got the band back together down the borough, how tight do the VFL monitor WADA and salary caps I wonder...This make Dodo a sad panda.
We swap 3 for 5 & 9 from the dee's. They are rabble and will think their getting a good dealReally hard to see us chasing 3 so hard only to split it again.
That's going to stickNick The Count Austin...Ahahahahaha
I don't dislike O'Sullivan, but I do wonder if he provides enough of a point of difference given we've already got Walsh and Cerra for the next ~8 years.
I think if we're taking a top 3 mid, the expectation will generally be that they play most of their first season. To make room in the middle, alongside Cripps, Walsh and a fit-again Cerra, it's probably Hewett that makes way. I reckon Cerra then takes the Hewett role, defensive-leaning mid but with the ability to make his kicks count when he gets them. To balance that group, you don't want another middling pace midfielder does everything to a good standard but lacks a genuine weapon - you want a bloke who can either tuck the ball under his arm and break the lines, or a bloke who can hold position outside the contest, be fed the ball by our more mature mids, and then hit leading targets for fun.
That would be incredibleTrade 3 for 6 and 10, send 10 to Port for Houston.
Very reasonable and well explained.Owies could have walked to the PSD or been taken as a DFA, not much value for a player of his type.
We also picked up some extra late picks which will ensure we're good to match bids for Ben and Lucas Campo.
Pick 12 and 14 vs Pick 3 is down to preference, really. Nothing inherently wrong with thinking we should have kept the later picks.
My view is that one of those two picks, statistically, won't work out. Pick 3 might be a bust too (ie. Dow), but is also a good chance of being a game-changer.
What I like about it is that there are a handful of midfielders vying for early selection that have traits we need. Draper is express, Reid is an elite distributor, Smith racks up a billion touches, cuts through traffic and uses the ball well, Smillie is a Cripps who can kick.
The players at 12-14 have some good traits, but a few of them have (as you'd expect) big question marks as well, Travaglia has a good turn of speed but his disposal is a bit suspect and his best position is probably wing (where we've stocked up on kids already). Lindsay is a good user of the ball but to my eye can be quite fumbly at ground level. Tauru and Trainor could be good defensive options, but Trainor has concussion concerns and Tauru isn't really KPP size. Hotton could have been good picks for our forward line, but has had his share of injuries.
The "one" that I'd have loved is Berry.
So Berry plus a "maybe" player, vs a top 3 midfielder with pace and/or good disposal.
this strategy from where I sit doesn't go anywhere close to fixing our main issue...our backline. I'm dumbfounded by this strategy!Don't think it will be possible to convince you...
Reality is, all draft picks are hit and miss. Pick 3 just gives you a better chance at getting a superstar, but only one bite at the cherry. 12 + 14 are two bites at the cherry, but less chance of either being a superstar.
12 could be the next Charlie Curnow and 3 could be the next Dow...
Or 3 could be the next Dusty and 12 the next Kane Lucas...
FOS ran a sub 3 second 20 metre sprint. Add his endurance and agility he's definitely not slow and would be our quickest mid by some margin.Don't think he's middling pace at all...
He had an injury interrupted year and that is my biggest concern with him. Multiple injuries...
Surprising he and Lucas have done well in various aspects of testing and we could have both on the list.FOS ran a sub 3 second 20 metre sprint. Add his endurance and agility he's definitely not slow and would be our quickest mid by some margin.
this strategy from where I sit doesn't go anywhere close to fixing our main issue...our backline. I'm dumbfounded by this strategy!
We absolutely need more gun midfielders. Different to ours.we don't need any more onballers...our priority is a key big defender (two would be great) ...hope his disposal is better than his cousins cause he costs us with his woeful disposal.
Our midfield will be set for the next 8 -10 years. A midfield of Camporeale x2, Lord,Walsh,Cerra, FOS/Draper and Cody to come is fantastic with Tassie about enter.Surprising he and Lucas have done well in various aspects of testing and we could have both on the list.
Very good argument Blue..Thanks a bunchOwies could have walked to the PSD or been taken as a DFA, not much value for a player of his type.
We also picked up some extra late picks which will ensure we're good to match bids for Ben and Lucas Campo.
Pick 12 and 14 vs Pick 3 is down to preference, really. Nothing inherently wrong with thinking we should have kept the later picks.
My view is that one of those two picks, statistically, won't work out. Pick 3 might be a bust too (ie. Dow), but is also a good chance of being a game-changer.
What I like about it is that there are a handful of midfielders vying for early selection that have traits we need. Draper is express, Reid is an elite distributor, Smith racks up a billion touches, cuts through traffic and uses the ball well, Smillie is a Cripps who can kick.
The players at 12-14 have some good traits, but a few of them have (as you'd expect) big question marks as well, Travaglia has a good turn of speed but his disposal is a bit suspect and his best position is probably wing (where we've stocked up on kids already). Lindsay is a good user of the ball but to my eye can be quite fumbly at ground level. Tauru and Trainor could be good defensive options, but Trainor has concussion concerns and Tauru isn't really KPP size. Hotton could have been good picks for our forward line, but has had his share of injuries.
The "one" that I'd have loved is Berry.
So Berry plus a "maybe" player, vs a top 3 midfielder with pace and/or good disposal.
If we're holding a pick in the 30s, I reckon the Ben bid comes early and wipes it.Kennedy out for a pick in the 30s will cap it all off for me.
A thumb and a finger- hardly multiple soft tissue injuriesDon't think he's middling pace at all...
He had an injury interrupted year and that is my biggest concern with him. Multiple injuries...
Only 7.30 in perthThis is still isn't official - getting a bit concerned lol
A thumb and a finger- hardly multiple soft tissue injuries
Agree on SW’s disposal / needs to be working on that as the 1st port of call over the off/pre-seasons (+ when/where to call for the ball).we don't need any more onballers...our priority is a key big defender (two would be great) ...hope his disposal is better than his cousins cause he costs us with his woeful disposal.
Two future firsts for Barrass seems a bit steep
Now that is interesting..... I like it !!!Trade 3 for 6 and 10, send 10 to Port for Houston.