Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you reckon the club was happy to pay overs (slight i might add) for Saad given Doc? No Simpson and potentially doc for 2021 would have concerned the club presumably.
Best to pull back a bit mate and laugh at the stupidity from the would be Carlton recruiters.I haven't ignored a single person in my 7 years here but I must admit I've been seriously tempted lately. I get close every trade period and when reading autopsy threads during the season.
Okay so we got - Saad, Fogarty (21 yo contracted player), #38, #48, #78
And we gave up - #8, #30, #51, #87.
What are people's thoughts on this?
Difference in quality between Newman and SaadNewman should be right to go.
Nothing to suggest from the statement that Doc won't be right to go round 1, got it early. Robbie Gray had similar last year in the preseason and was good to go round 1.Do you reckon the club was happy to pay overs (slight i might add) for Saad given Doc? No Simpson and potentially doc for 2021 would have concerned the club presumably.
Difference in quality between Newman and Saad
Rubbish!
Overall.
Downgrade of our second and upgrade of our third and fourth probably balance out. Difficult to judge accurately til after the draft, as these picks will all move a fair bit.
Pretty much makes it 8 for Saad and Fogarty.
Assuming Saad does what we expect, Fogarty determines the value assessment.
If Fog ends up another Smedts or Sumner - no impact - it's a poor result.
If Fog ends up another Kennedy or Lang - not a senior fixture, but good depth - it's breakeven.
If Fog ends up another Setterfield or Plowman - regular best 22 contributor - it's an incredible haul.
And that is uge.I honestly think the biggest thing Saad does for us is he makes the opposition make a decision: do we tag Saad or Doch?
But, but why are you a toilet?Big difference
Pick 50 at best
I’m not overly unhappy with the outcome or Austin per say. But I think it’s important to be honest in summing up our performance. AFL draft and trading is part of our game’s competitive environment. We paid overs. We could have handled the trade differently and performed better; importantly it’s reasonably likely that with SOS at the helm we would have performed better than we did. The bloke who Jake Niall referred to as holding a Richmond passport publicly underpinned his decision to replace SOS on the need to improve LM efficiency; and by consequence performance. That hasn’t been the case; he was wrong.We got what we wanted, Saad. Not bent over. We paid overs but, we got what we needed. Not wanted, needed. We chased, we pay. I get the OOC stuff but that is the system. Until OOC players are free agents in the truest sense (unlikely to happen) these situations will continue. Would you want a first for Doc?
We’ve got 2 gun players, a 21 year old small forward with speed and power, and we still have a 2nd, 3rd and 4th round pick in this draft. I’m happy.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Big difference
If there’s anything you need to know about this kid, just ask me !
I can’t see that being true. We would have explored that option if true, if not Austin needs the sackI don't want to labor on the point because the deal is done but the news coming out on Trade Radio & Fox Trading Day say Essendon will trade pick 8 to Collingwood (who are supposedly desperate to get into the top 10) for pick 16 & next years first rounder. Surely not!
Given he’s played 22 odd games for the Cats at 21 years of age I reckon he’s a lock as a useful depth player. Hopefully he learns some new tricks from Eddie and plays in our next flag.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Going to start calling him:
Lachie "Not a small forward" Fogarty
Small, nuggety mid
On SM-G950F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Nothing to suggest from the statement that Doc won't be right to go round 1, got it early. Robbie Gray had similar last year in the preseason and was good to go round 1.