Yeah. 28+33 for Griffin would be fine. Surely 23 on top of that would be unnecessary.
Perhaps a player + 23 for Clark and we keep 16?
Perhaps a player + 23 for Clark and we keep 16?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Port Adelaide - 7:40 / 7:10 Fri
Squiggle tips Swans at 57% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
That's a lot of picks for Griffin...
After the Judd Trade and the way Carlton dealt with us we were incredibly bitter with them. When rumours of Kerr moving to Carlton the year later surfaced, journos asked Woosh what he would want for him and he said Kruezer,Gibbs,Murphy and Judd. LOL. Truth is if clubs are fair with us we are fair with them. We gave very fair compo for Chick and Stenglein and took less than what was deserved on Gehrig and Judd. When a fringe player we know has little opportunities of getting what he wants requests a trade, we as a club do everything to accommodate said player. Mckinley,Spangher,Seaby,Staker. We never try to **** other clubs. Time is changing all you pathetic little teams like Port that rely on handouts and are trying to stand over our club with threats. Because once Free Agency comes in you can say bye bye to your W.A talent for F... all because you can't compete with our pockets, facilities, supporters and sponsors. Now we know how the Visy deal works i'm certain SGIO could do with a few spokesmen. One year to go. (licks lips)
So... Fremantle lose Griffin and move down 7 spots in the first to nab two second round picks?Perhaps this then...
Port - Griffen, Ebert
for 28, 33
Westcoast - 16, 38
for Ebert and 23
Fremantle - 23, 28, 33
for Griffen and 16
or
Port - Ebert, Griffen
for 28, 33, 45
Westcoast - 15, 33
for Ebert, 16
Fremantle get - 23, 28, 45
for Griffen and 16
Because once Free Agency comes in you can say bye bye to your W.A talent for F... all because you can't compete with our pockets, facilities, supporters and sponsors. Now we know how the Visy deal works i'm certain SGIO could do with a few spokesmen. One year to go. (licks lips)
BRAD Ebert's manager has refused to be part of a mooted three-way deal between West Coast, Adelaide and Brisbane that would see Mitch Clark become an Eagle and Ebert a Crow.
"The Crows are aware that Brad's preference is to go to Port Adelaide and he'll be going to Port Adelaide, full stop," Reid said.
West Coast's best chance of snaring Clark is by offering Brisbane a deal headlined by a quality ready-made player, along with a draft pick.
a) When it comes to player payments, having lots of money doesn't really help because of the salary cap.
b) Our facilities are actually pretty middle-of-the-road by AFL standards these days.
c) I think you'll find that some of the Victorian clubs have some pretty good sponsors. Not that it really matters. By and large, the AFL regulate player payments pretty closely.
Do you honestly think that free agency will change things that much? The main purpose is to stop situations like Jade Rawlings or Nick Stevens. It's not going to allow us to snag a big name like, say, Franklin.
Ebert's Manager Rejects 3-way Trade
No big shock there, but are you guys dirty with Ebert at all for demanding a specific club?
Sorry but I just don't want Motlop. Would be livid if the club traded him inIt is understood West Coast is not interested in any players Port might be willing to offer as a puzzle piece in a trade for Ebert.
That would spear Daniel Motlop's hopes of moving from Port to one of the WA-based clubs to be with his son, who is in Perth
Ebert's Manager Rejects 3-way Trade
No big shock there, but are you guys dirty with Ebert at all for demanding a specific club?
Happens every yearDefinitely.
How can his manager get away with making the statement that Ebert will be going to Port? This seems tantamount to expressing an intention to tamper with the draft...Sure he can't be forced to go to Adelaide - but equally he can't resist going to other clubs ahead of Port in the PSD. The manager should be served with one of Adrian Anderson's "please explain" letters.
Not really. He's been offered a good contract by the club his family has strong connections to.
I was agreeing with you.Strong connections? His cousin Brett has played 150 games for Port, his uncle Russell is possibly the greatest player ever for Port Adelaide, who played 392 games for the club, and his dad played for Port Adelaide.
So his family doesn't just have strong connections to Port Adelaide, his family is second best family (only to the Williams family) to ever represent Port Adelaide. And by the time Brett and Brad's careers are over, some might say the Ebert family is the greatest family of Port Adelaide.
And yes, Port Adelaide has been a big family club for years. With the Williams', Ebert's, Burgoyne's, Cornes' (excluding Graham), Tredrea's, Westhoff's (although Matthew has been delisted), Motlop's (now both are gone). I've probably forgotten another family or two lol
Strong connections? His cousin Brett has played 150 games for Port, his uncle Russell is possibly the greatest player ever for Port Adelaide, who played 392 games for the club, and his dad played for Port Adelaide.
So his family doesn't just have strong connections to Port Adelaide, his family is second best family (only to the Williams family) to ever represent Port Adelaide. And by the time Brett and Brad's careers are over, some might say the Ebert family is the greatest family of Port Adelaide.
And yes, Port Adelaide has been a big family club for years. With the Williams', Ebert's, Burgoyne's, Cornes' (excluding Graham), Tredrea's, Westhoff's (although Matthew has been delisted), Motlop's (now both are gone). I've probably forgotten another family or two lol
Trying to look like a smarmy c***, just looks like a c***I was agreeing with you.
Strong connections? His cousin Brett has played 150 games for Port, his uncle Russell is possibly the greatest player ever for Port Adelaide, who played 392 games for the club, and his dad played for Port Adelaide.
So his family doesn't just have strong connections to Port Adelaide, his family is second best family (only to the Williams family) to ever represent Port Adelaide. And by the time Brett and Brad's careers are over, some might say the Ebert family is the greatest family of Port Adelaide.
And yes, Port Adelaide has been a big family club for years. With the Williams', Ebert's, Burgoyne's, Cornes' (excluding Graham), Tredrea's, Westhoff's (although Matthew has been delisted), Motlop's (now both are gone). I've probably forgotten another family or two lol