Breaking News: Cuz back in trouble

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Guy's Ben is a smack head!!! It wasn't vallium or any other pescribed drug, He is into party drugs like Eccies and ICE!
 
In Victoria, no, in W.A., I don't know. Section 49 of the Road Safety Act in Victoria explicitly states that a blood test is required to prove a crime has been committed.
There are some seriously dangerous prescription drugs out there, Oxycontin being an example. It goes heroin > morphine > oxycontin. So therefore, possessing a drug such as that is much more serious than not taking a test. I'm not saying Cousins had that, obviously.
But you asked the question.

If you were picked up by police driving errantly and appeared to be clearly intoxicated and refused to take a test you would still be proscecuted for driving under the influence. Otherwise everyone would just refuse to take the test. They advise you that if you refuse to take the test you will be proscecuted at the maximum charge and refusal to take a test isnt defendable in court without signficant supporting medical evidence.

I found this on a site

Refusing tests

It's an offence for a driver to:

* fail to stop for a roadside breath test;
* refuse to take a breathalyser or breath test (which includes not blowing properly into the device);
* refuse to undertake a sobriety test;
* refuse to allow a blood sample to be taken after being admitted to a hospital after a car accident;
* refuse to allow a blood and/or urine sample to be taken following a sobriety; test and
* refuse to allow a blood test (or urine specimen) at a doctor's or hospital if suspected of being "under the influence" of a drug.

These are serious offences, and you should see a lawyer straight away if you are charged. The lawyer will ask you questions to make sure that the police followed the right procedure, and that you were really obliged to take the test. But in general, you will find it hard to challenge these offences.

Remember, the penalty for refusing to take these tests may involve prison sentences! There can also be a heavy fine.
 
I have heard UNCONFIRMED that forensic police are at Daniel Kerr's house searching cars. If so then obviously the police have been on the WCE trail for a while.

If this is true and this goes further than just Chick and Cousins then it could very well be the end of the WCE.

By the way, did any Eagles members recieve their membership renewal today? I got mine and I almost feel so disenchanted that I want to tear it up.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

(Log in to remove this ad.)

And we thought the Judd threads were hot

Cannot even keep up with the posts
 
If you were picked up by police driving errantly and appeared to be clearly intoxicated and refused to take a test you would still be proscecuted for driving under the influence. Otherwise everyone would just refuse to take the test. They advise you that if you refuse to take the test you will be proscecuted at the maximum charge and refusal to take a test isnt defendable in court without signficant supporting medical evidence.

Section 49(1) is specifically relating to drugs. I'm getting this out of my uni textbook as well. You need to prove the case when it comes to drugs with hard evidence. You also need to prove that the driver, if they were indeed on drugs, was actually impaired at the time.

EDIT: I'm not saying refusing is not serious, it is. BUT, driving under illicit drugs only carries a 3-month suspended licence as a FIRST offence, which is what this would be. That's not exactly tough.
If you had something like Oxycontin, you'd be in a HELL of a lot more trouble.
 
Section 49(1) is specifically relating to drugs. I'm getting this out of my uni textbook as well. You need to prove the case when it comes to drugs with hard evidence. You also need to prove that the driver, if they were indeed on drugs, was actually impaired at the time.

I did find this online

Refusing tests

It's an offence for a driver to:

* fail to stop for a roadside breath test;
* refuse to take a breathalyser or breath test (which includes not blowing properly into the device);
* refuse to undertake a sobriety test;
* refuse to allow a blood sample to be taken after being admitted to a hospital after a car accident;
* refuse to allow a blood and/or urine sample to be taken following a sobriety; test and
* refuse to allow a blood test (or urine specimen) at a doctor's or hospital if suspected of being "under the influence" of a drug.

These are serious offences, and you should see a lawyer straight away if you are charged. The lawyer will ask you questions to make sure that the police followed the right procedure, and that you were really obliged to take the test. But in general, you will find it hard to challenge these offences.

Remember, the penalty for refusing to take these tests may involve prison sentences! There can also be a heavy fine.
 
I have heard UNCONFIRMED that forensic police are at Daniel Kerr's house searching cars. If so then obviously the police have been on the WCE trail for a while.

If this is true and this goes further than just Chick and Cousins then it could very well be the end of the WCE.

By the way, did any Eagles members recieve their membership renewal today? I got mine and I almost feel so disenchanted that I want to tear it up.

Why does this not surprise me, I've heard some bad stuff about him lately.
 
A PDF relating to drug driving (in WA) can be downloaded here;
http://www.officeofroadsafety.wa.gov.au/index.cfm?event=topicsDrugDriving
(under commonly asked questions).

For a person suspected of drug driving a saliva test is first performed and if that registers positively a blood/urine sample is collected.

The act is quite specific and refers to THC (the active ingredient in cannabis), methylamphetamines (eg ‘speed’ or ‘ice’) and MDMA (eg ‘ecstasy’).

The penalties are quite small. A $200-2500 fine for refusing a test, depending on the circumstances.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top