There's no need for this kind of bias on this board.
Now that's a definition of irony. You accuse MS, who is a genius compared to you biased? That's rich.
To describe Rioli as a player in the mould of Eddie Betts and Aaron Davey is clearly misleading.
Is it? He is a in the similar mould, SF/HFF who rotates into the middle, and Davey often plays middle. Anyway, you're the one making poor comparisons so this is PKB. A number of impartial posters have said that. Do you want me to drag them up?
Who can forget the way Jimmy Plunkett burst onto the scene for a year?
Exactly! Players who have one good season mean zilch! Thanks for proving the blues fan's main point! Deledio had as good a season as Rioli (he won the rising star folks) yet are tigers fans using that as an excuse to pump up his tires? No, we waited until he did something, this year, when he averaged 25 touches and a goal a game this year.
Should we compare him to Gibbs and say that Bryce has only a year or two left at AFL Level? Of course not. These comparisons can be made, but they are all unwarranted. Rioli has too much class and all-round ability, not to mention pedigree, to be the next Aaron Davey or Eddie Betts.
Speaking of comparisons your comparison is completely unwarranted, they're completely different players.
Oh and you still haven't put up a decent argument for why Rioli is better than Gibbs, other than "teh blues fans think Gibbs is good, but he's a squib! Lulz!"
That's not an argument, that's an excuse to point and laugh. How come bigfooty calls you a troll? How come no-one likes you on the soccer board? This may seem personal mods but this guy is a troll and it has to be pointed out how many people acknowledge this.
Answer me this: Gibbs has similar figures to Selwood, I guess he's no good either?
Gibbs is very young, you think you know what players can and will do in 10 years time? If so, do tell us soothsayer, lottery numbers please?
Gibbs was rated highly by pretty much every recruiter and has got high praise by many critics. Yet you know more about them? Do tell us, how do you rate this year's crop of kids?
You think Gibbs is just an accumulator, yet Gibbs is a known goal kicking midfielder. Now I don't know about you, but stats which include GOALS don't seem to be just "stats" to me. Neither do stats which illustrate the lack of possessions to opponents.
Fact is, both clubs should be happy with what they've got, a club can't have every good player and both look to be 200+ game players. Why you'd spend all this time arguing "oh, but mine is better" especially when they are incomparable, is anyone's guess.