
No I’m just impressed that you’re still thrashing it enough to bother looking this s**t up.
You must be, because you keep coming back.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
LIVE: Hawthorn v Collingwood - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Pies at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 22
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
LIVE: Hawthorn v Collingwood - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Pies at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists »
No I’m just impressed that you’re still thrashing it enough to bother looking this s**t up.
If Matthews was given the voting Martin has he’d have won the most Brownlow’s ever.Martin has never averaged 20+ and 2+. In the last 12-years … you know, modern footy, nobody has done it.
How many times was Lethal voted BOG by the umpires? 36 times or 11.9% of games. For Martin it’s 42 or 15.4% of games. Wowsers, that’s a decent gap.
Or what about voted in best 3 in the ground? Martin 35.9% of times. Lethal 23.4%. Gee, that’s an enormous gap when comparing the same stats.
How can that be ? It’s almost like certain stats and data changes between era’s, isn’t it?
But against their contemporaries and in the immediate aftermath of a game, an independent judge said Martin was in the best-3 players 35.9% of times he played versus just 23.4% for Lethal. Lethal must have been the ‘icing on the cake’ to his teammates great work a little more than I remember to be overlooked completely in 76.6% of games he played…..
Of course none of that is true … but it’s pretty easy to see how some data points from era to era are not really all that relevant.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
If Matthews was given the voting Martin has he’d have won the most Brownlow’s ever.
The umps voted differently back then. Take Matthews getting only 3 votes for his 1978 year.
Matthews basically did it 13 years in a row if you round up by a couple of goals in 2 seasons. Nobody else has ever been close. Not in his era, not in any era.That was my point. The game changes. It was said the fact Lethal has lots of seasons of 20+ and 2+, but Martin has none as a ‘gotcha’ moment. Except not a single player has achieved that since 2011. Just as not a single player has kicked 100-goals in 15-years. 100-goals was kicked 18 times during Lethal’s career from 1969-1985.
The way the game is played and goals are kicked has changed, and the way Brownlow votes are distributed has changed.
KB .. in the same era as Lethal and also playing in a top-team, achieved 20+ / 2+ 4 times. (He achieved 19+ / 1.9+ 7 times).
Garry Wilson in the same era achieved 20+ and 1.8+ 7 times in just 14 seasons.
Rod Ashman did 20+ and 2+ twice. He did 19 / 1.8 5 times…. Ashman was a fine player, but no superstar.
Here are some others to have achieved it or very close to it:
Kekovich : 19.4 / 3.5 in 1969
Bissett: 26 / 2.37 in 1969
Bedford: 24 / 2.17 in 1970
Bisset: 21 / 2.14 in 1970
Murphy: 26 / 2 in 1970
Bill Ryan: 20 / 2.1 in 1971
Breen: 20 / 2.06 in 1971
David Clarke: 21 / 3.06 in 1972
Lethal : 23 / 2.14 in 1972
I stopped at 1972, but it’s pretty clear that 20+ / 2+ was ‘relatively’ common in Lethal’s era. And it hasn’t been achieved once since 2011 in modern footy so it’s really not very relevant … just like Brownlow votes between era’s cannot be compared.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Yeah, but I also kinda get it. I think Franklin is clearly the best key forward of the 21st century and would strongly argue against anyone who disagrees.I just don't get why this topic matters so much to Richmond fans. It is like they are putting all their self worth into trying to convince everyone that Martin is the bestest ever.
It really feels like a "my dad can beat up your dad" situation in the playground, but even more pathetic as these Richmond fans are grown adults.
Matthews basically did it 13 years in a row if you round up by a couple of goals in 2 seasons. Nobody else has ever been close. Not in his era, not in any era.
To try to compare that with some subjective awards is an utter joke.
Stopping in 1972 before Lethal even really got started is even more ludicrous, but par for the course with you.
Oh, are you claiming martin is the best of his era or the best all time?And Martin has done 20+ and 1+ in 11 of his 14 season. No players in his era comes close to that either. So seems we are on the same page.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
I don’t get it either. But I find it equally amusing the main protagonists in this thread are Geelong fans.I just don't get why this topic matters so much to Richmond fans.
Never mind 20 and 2 though. Matthews had 7 seasons of 20 and 3.That was my point. The game changes. It was said the fact Lethal has lots of seasons of 20+ and 2+, but Martin has none as a ‘gotcha’ moment. Except not a single player has achieved that since 2011. Just as not a single player has kicked 100-goals in 15-years. 100-goals was kicked 18 times during Lethal’s career from 1969-1985.
The way the game is played and goals are kicked has changed, and the way Brownlow votes are distributed has changed.
KB .. in the same era as Lethal and also playing in a top-team, achieved 20+ / 2+ 4 times. (He achieved 19+ / 1.9+ 7 times).
Garry Wilson in the same era achieved 20+ and 1.8+ 7 times in just 14 seasons.
Rod Ashman did 20+ and 2+ twice. He did 19 / 1.8 5 times…. Ashman was a fine player, but no superstar.
Here are some others to have achieved it or very close to it:
Kekovich : 19.4 / 3.5 in 1969
Bissett: 26 / 2.37 in 1969
Bedford: 24 / 2.17 in 1970
Bisset: 21 / 2.14 in 1970
Murphy: 26 / 2 in 1970
Bill Ryan: 20 / 2.1 in 1971
Breen: 20 / 2.06 in 1971
David Clarke: 21 / 3.06 in 1972
Lethal : 23 / 2.14 in 1972
I stopped at 1972, but it’s pretty clear that 20+ / 2+ was ‘relatively’ common in Lethal’s era. And it hasn’t been achieved once since 2011 in modern footy so it’s really not very relevant … just like Brownlow votes between era’s cannot be compared.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
That season he had 500+ kicks and 90+ goals was pretty incredible.Never mind 20 and 2 though. Matthews had 7 seasons of 20 and 3.
And missed it by one goal in 1975 where he also won the Coleman medal. While averaging 20 touches.
So you can say the game has changed but Matthews was so far ahead of the field when he played and compared to now.
Even compared to the game back then he was doing unprecedented things
He's not even the best Richmond player of all time. That honour goes to Kevin Bartlett.I don’t get it either. But I find it equally amusing the main protagonists in this thread are Geelong fans.
Oh, are you claiming martin is the best of his era or the best all time?
Not that he is the best of his era either of course, GAJ racked up a massive number of 20/1 seasons.
How many had a 20 and 3 in Matthews time?I’m just comparing players within the same era when talking stats involving goals. When not a single player has achieved 20+/2+ in 12 x seasons (GAJ never did it either), then it’s pretty clear it shouldn’t be used as a comparative marker between era’s. 20+ / 2+ was achieved in excess of 75 times between 1969-1985, compared to zero from 2012-2023.
And if we are purely talking 20/1, in modern times Martin has done it 11 times, GAJ 9 times and Danger 5 times. I don’t believe this proves anything definitive at all, but it’s an interesting stat as based on how often it is achieved, 20/1 is probably the equivalent of 20/2 in Lethal’s era.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Because Tiger fans have a horrible abyss of nothing on the horizonWhy is this still a thread?
The answer is NO
Probably similar to why Cats fans are here for their club TBH.Because Tiger fans have a horrible abyss of nothing on the horizon
Because Tiger fans have a horrible abyss of nothing on the horizon
Now now, both Geelong and Richmond are about to fall off a cliff![]()
I'm sure there's a thread somewhere about this regarding Geelong, been bumped a fair bit, will eventually ring true...