News Chad Wingard traded to Hawthorn for ... dammit who is peeling onions?

[OneGreatClub]

Hawks are gonna be within a bees whisker of pulling the plug and going again next year.

Well if it is true that Chad really does want to stay then just maybe he will pull his finger out and sort his issues. I will be ropable if we buckle without a very good deal.

 

[Doctor Feel]

Would lol if the Polec story about him not wanting to go made them blink. Trollec.

 

[chachi11]

Hawks are gonna be within a bees whisker of pulling the plug and going again next year.

This works.

 

[B0ydmental]

Are we to assume no other club with a top pick hasnt asked about wingard?

If you were another club what would you pay...this season. I'd pay 3. And with that I expect wingard > whoever goes 1 or 2 as well. Infact it's just ridiculous other clubs aren't rolling a mat out for him.

Nothing makes sense

 

[Coobk001]

All this talk of the deal falling over, I hope it's possible, but refusing to get my hopes up now.

I can live with an off season of Rozee, Hately and Lycett for Polec, Pittard and Toumpas, but I really don't want to see Wingard on that outs list.

 

[HinkleysHeroes]

I think he will stay because the trade will not get done. They will not be able to offer us a high enough pick.

Then we back in our new coaching department to turn it around. It's happened before. And it will happen again.

 

[Hong-Kong Phooey]

Hawks are gonna be within a bees whisker of pulling the plug and going again next year.

You seem to have a little bit of inside knowledge on some personal relationships with players, but bugga all about trade updates. In life, you always ook better when you stick to what you knw.

 

[Hong-Kong Phooey]

I think he will stay because the trade will not get done. They will not be able to offer us a high enough pick.

Then we back in our new coaching department to turn it around. It's happened before. And it will happen again.

Agree. This is what will happen. I'm banking on Schofield being our knight.

 

[TeeKray]

We'll buckle, don't worry about that. I reckon we'd still deal on this if Hawthorn offered nothing but pick 15.

 

[Ports2GetLukosius]

I think he will stay because the trade will not get done. They will not be able to offer us a high enough pick.

Then we back in our new coaching department to turn it around. It's happened before. And it will happen again.

Let’s hope so, but I can’t see why Burton’s agreed to a deal if it isn’t a very high chance of getting done.

 

[Hong-Kong Phooey]

We'll buckle, don't worry about that. I reckon we'd still deal on this if Hawthorn offered nothing but pick 15.

Disagree. We know we have already ****ed this one up enough. Can't afford the public backlash of another. I think they will sit on 6 and 10. Hawks know they have an aging list that won't be as good in 2020

 

[G3TWOTYAD3S3RV]

Let’s keep Chad & steal Burton off those skid stains. Screw M !!

 

[Jack_1870]

Ultimately PAFC answers to it's members,without them the club would not exist.
Wingard is our best creative player under 30,he's our number 1 draw card,he brings new members and fans to the club.
If PAFC trade him to Hawthorn,they have failed it's members in a massive way.
Anyone involved in that decision should be out the door.
Even worse we will be helping Hawthorn become a superpower,I am staggered by such idiocy.

 

[JimmyBeerCans]

It'll be Burton + 15 and nothing more we are just posturing for more and will bend over like a cheap hooker tomorrow.

 

[wingardsmark]

He won't stay, Port seem to have made their decision and will just settle if Hawthorn don't offer anything else

 

[Doctor Feel]

The ultimate call is still Chad's. He is contracted. As is Burton, really.

 

[Hong-Kong Phooey]

The ultimate call is still Chad's. He is contracted. As is Burton, really.

It's both club and player. A contract goes both ways

 

[Adam Marrett23]

The ultimate call is still Chad's. He is contracted. As is Burton, really.

You just had to do it, give us hope with a night to go.

Though you are right, hopefully he is still a Port player at the end of tomorrow, and we are saved from ourselves, then it's 12 months for Chad and the club to turn it around

 

[RussellEbertHandball]

The ultimate call is still Chad's. He is contracted. As is Burton, really.

So we potentially have a
yes - no, or yes - yes, or no -yes situation.

Could be a bit like the 1996 Melbourne v Hawks merger. One said yes and then at the last minute the other said no after giving every indication they would vote yes.

 

[wingardsmark]

Trade will happen at 8.29pm

 

[Doctor Feel]

It's both club and player. A contract goes both ways

Nope. The power is all with Chad. We would have to pay out the next year of his contract if we were to nullify it and move him without his consent.

 

[JimmyBeerCans]

It's both club and player. A contract goes both ways

He can refuse to go but it won't happen.

 

[Hong-Kong Phooey]

Nope. The power is all with Chad. We would have to pay out the next year of his contract if we were to nullify it and move him without his consent.

Why would we void it? He is contracted. If the club wants him to stay he stays. It's not just up to Chad at all.

 

[Hong-Kong Phooey]

He can refuse to go but it won't happen.

You misunderstand me. I mean if we don't want to trade him, then he can't force it. If the club wants to keep then we keep.

 

[Doctor Feel]

Why would we void it? He is contracted. If the club wants him to stay he stays. It's not just up to Chad at all.

You cannot move a player who is currently contracted to your club without the players consent. AFL rules.