Opinion Changes for QF v Geelong

Remove this Banner Ad

We really don't have anyone who is a good match up on Hawkins. But not many teams do. Even May struggled with him last night and he's an ox.

McKenzie will get the job and try to force him wide to the boundaries for his kicks and hope he misses.

We have to beat them in the midfield and deny them the ball. Melbourne took control of midfield and Geelong collapsed defensively.

Do we bring in Peps this week because this will be trench warfare for at least the first half.
 
We really don't have anyone who is a good match up on Hawkins. But not many teams do. Even May struggled with him last night and he's an ox.

McKenzie will get the job and try to force him wide to the boundaries for his kicks and hope he misses.

We have to beat them in the midfield and deny them the ball. Melbourne took control of midfield and Geelong collapsed defensively.

Do we bring in Peps this week because this will be trench warfare for at least the first half.

I think so. I think strong contested players might be of more worth than speedy forwards in this case.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

We really don't have anyone who is a good match up on Hawkins. But not many teams do. Even May struggled with him last night and he's an ox.

McKenzie will get the job and try to force him wide to the boundaries for his kicks and hope he misses.

We have to beat them in the midfield and deny them the ball. Melbourne took control of midfield and Geelong collapsed defensively.

Do we bring in Peps this week because this will be trench warfare for at least the first half.


I’m sure they’ve been keeping him back for finals
 
Still fills me with more hope than having Mckenzie taking him. He won’t be able to beat him in one on ones.
And Clurey can? Again, have you forgotten what happened last time Clurey took on Hawkins?
 
If Fantasia is ready bring him in for Mitch.
I’d bring SPP in for Motlop and make Motlop the sub. SPP’s gives our forward half a better balance with his pressure.
Not sure how we deal with Hawkins though.
 
If Fantasia is ready bring him in for Mitch.
I’d bring SPP in for Motlop and make Motlop the sub. SPP’s gives our forward half a better balance with his pressure.
Not sure how we deal with Hawkins though.

The only way to deal with Hawkins is to make sure their midfield doesn't get the ball.
We could keep them to 8 goals and he'll still kick 5 of them.
 
Love Bergman just don’t know who else would come out if we need Clurey for a match up!

Clurey doesn't come in for anyone except for Jonas, Aliir or McKenzie.
Unlike the quadrangle of doom up front, we can't carry those four at the back. Especially against Geelong.
 
Maybe once we're done bringing in Clurey for a specialist matchup on Hawkins we could bring in Gladys for some specialist advice about how to prevent the spread of COVID-19, or Scott Morrison for some specialist advice on how best to handle PR in a bushfire crisis.
 
Maybe once we're done bringing in Clurey for a specialist matchup on Hawkins we could bring in Gladys for some specialist advice about how to prevent the spread of COVID-19, or Scott Morrison for some specialist advice on how best to handle PR in a bushfire crisis.

Now now, NSW is Gold Standard and it’s not a race
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Who are we pretending has an injury in order to bring Pep on?

Whoever is gassed the most out of Duursma, Motlop, Amon or Bergman. These four should be on their bike every time there is a turnover, providing options down each wing. We wait for Geelong to setup defensively and we're going to lose every time.

Geelong's MO is to solidify fluid ball movement with ball retention that freezes out free-wheeling teams. The thing that has always countered Geelong's style is bringing the fire of hard ball and loose ball gets to the coal face and putting them under pressure and then explode out of the contest, which is how Melbourne ran them down.

The reason I want Pep as the sub is because I want him fresh when Selwood, Dangerfield and Guthrie are tired. Interestingly, in the past few rounds, Geelong has been giving key players under 70% TOG for matches after the bye:

vs Essendon - J Selwood 64% TOG, C Guthrie 66% TOG, B Parfitt 66% TOG, R Stanley 63% TOG
vs Carlton - B Parfitt 61% TOG
vs Fremantle - J Selwood 66% TOG, B Parfitt 61% TOG
vs Richmond - M O'Connor 67% TOG
vs North Melbourne - C Guthrie 62% TOG
vs GWS - P Dangerfield 9% TOG (injured)
vs St Kilda - M Holmes 60% TOG
vs Melbourne - J Selwood 64% TOG

Compared to Port:

vs Hawthorn - S Powell-Pepper 66% TOG
vs Melbourne - S Powell-Pepper 66% TOG, Z Butters 50% TOG
vs St Kilda - S Powell-Pepper 68% TOG
vs Collingwood - nil
vs GWS - nil
vs Adelaide - R Bonner 66% TOG
vs Carlton - S Lycett 49% TOG
vs Western Bulldogs - W Drew 64% TOG

Pep doesn't have the tank to last a full game - even when he’s been above 70% TOG it’s only ever been marginal. What he does have is burst speed and power that we can exploit against Geelong’s defence and secondary mid.

Cats would remember that they played us minus Lycett, Fantasia, Butters and Duursma and them plus Stewart, Tuohy and Duncan. Even if they rush Tuohy and Duncan back I’d still back us in to run them into the ground.
 
The last few encounters, Rockliff always went well - need Drew at his best.
 

Attachments

  • EF2442FB-A97D-4B1F-920B-F1A19F2A2F7D.png
    EF2442FB-A97D-4B1F-920B-F1A19F2A2F7D.png
    119.8 KB · Views: 45
  • 251D3CE9-5B24-4E7B-AA51-CC64BA354AB2.png
    251D3CE9-5B24-4E7B-AA51-CC64BA354AB2.png
    122.4 KB · Views: 52
  • EF9FE076-C587-486A-8024-84B63BA03119.png
    EF9FE076-C587-486A-8024-84B63BA03119.png
    123.3 KB · Views: 44
One thing that went bad for us last time we played them is that Gary Rohan absolutely killed Jonas who shouldn't had been on him to begin with.
 
It's an unpopular opinion but Bergman out for Powell Pepper is something I'd seriously think about.

We can't have finals situations being overwhelming for him so that he's solely responsible for turnover goals at half back like against the Bulldogs.
I think the coaches will certainly consider that in their conversation.

At the end of the day though, I think the experience that he endured as a 12 gamer, against the Dogs, in what would have be akin to finals type pressure, will do him the world of good.

I think he keeps his spot.
 
And Clurey can? Again, have you forgotten what happened last time Clurey took on Hawkins?
To be fair, the time before that Clurey dominated Hawkins to the extent that it was one of the worst games of Hawkins’ career. Although it probably makes us too slow in defence bringing in Clurey as well as keeping McKenzie to free up Allir more would definitely be a consideration ( I wouldn’t do this as I think maintaining stability in defence is extra important, and we’d lose rebound off half back).
 
Geelong are missing two gun defenders in Zach Tuohy and Tom Stewart, the high half forward role is for us to exploit.
 
motlop is a big game player, need him in. need spp too. sub makes sense.
hawkins and cameron a worry but only if they get hold of us in the centre.
slow starts a worry.
i can envision a very close game, where geelong get an early lead and we spend 3 qtrs trying to pull it back. geelong play a very short possession game coming out of defense then unleash when they get to the midfield and find an opening in the zone. ken better have a good tactic to break this game up or i am going to go berzerk.
 
motlop is a big game player, need him in. need spp too. sub makes sense.
hawkins and cameron a worry but only if they get hold of us in the centre.
slow starts a worry.
i can envision a very close game, where geelong get an early lead and we spend 3 qtrs trying to pull it back. geelong play a very short possession game coming out of defense then unleash when they get to the midfield and find an opening in the zone. ken better have a good tactic to break this game up or i am going to go berzerk.
Surely SPP the sub
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Opinion Changes for QF v Geelong

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top