Preview Changes & Preview Thread for Round 18, 2023 vs Carlton at Marvel

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Visentini looked overwhelmed when he played a couple weeks ago. Give him some time in the SANFL to build, he's not ready.

Lord for Dixon or Hayes forward and providing a ruck chop-out if Lycett comes back is the better shout.
 
i'm excited by Lord/Dante coming in for Dixon. even TJ in is interesting given he was finally dropped and he's back under very different circumstances. Junior out for Duursma (sub) and Narkle starts?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Visentini looked overwhelmed when he played a couple weeks ago. Give him some time in the SANFL to build, he's not ready.

Lord for Dixon or Hayes forward and providing a ruck chop-out if Lycett comes back is the better shout.
He did (after a less than ideal preparation) but then went back and had a BOG performance in the SANFL.

The other option is Lord, who has shown glimpses in his AFL games and enough in his AFL games to be persisted with, but on the flip side has been quiet in the SANFL and is coming off suspension.

Probably comes down to structure and how we want to use Finlayson. Do we want to bring in a forward and ruck Finlayson, or play 2 rucks and free up Finlayson to play forward.
 
He did (after a less than ideal preparation) but then went back and had a BOG performance in the SANFL.

The other option is Lord, who has shown glimpses in his AFL games and enough in his AFL games to be persisted with, but on the flip side has been quiet in the SANFL and is coming off suspension.

Probably comes down to structure and how we want to use Finlayson. Do we want to bring in a forward and ruck Finlayson, or play 2 rucks and free up Finlayson to play forward.
Finlayson does better up forward than in ruck so freeing him up forward is a priority, especially with no Dixon.
 
Probably comes down to structure and how we want to use Finlayson. Do we want to bring in a forward and ruck Finlayson, or play 2 rucks and free up Finlayson to play forward.
Fast mobility is the key factor in winning teams in final contention this season. And the ability to maintain forward pressure (Port has won the tackle count in almost every game this season btw).

No way in hell Port will play 2 recognised rucks, especially against Carlton.

Bulldogs dropping Lobb to focus on English and Melbourne dropping Grundy to focus on Gawn is an example of current thinking.

Having one recognised ruckman who can work for 80% of the game and has the mobility to handle the pressure stuff and having a tall forward to handle the ruckwork up forward is what makes sense imho.
 
Last edited:

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Fast mobility is the key factor in winning teams in final contention this season. And the ability to maintain forward pressure (Port has won the tackle count in almost every game this season btw).

No way in hell Port will play 2 recognised rucks, especially against Carlton.

Bulldogs dropping Lobb to focus on English and Melbourne dropping Grundy to focus on Gawn is an example of current thinking.

Having one recognised ruckman who can work for 80% of the game and has the mobility to handle the pressure stuff and having a tall forward to handle the ruckwork up forward is what makes sense imho.
Fair call. The top teams are playing run and gun footy, they spread super fast from the contest, Essendon killed the crows in this respect.
Plus the Game is at marvel, a super hard, fast deck and Carlton might not even have one ruck playing but have very good/ tall forwards to contend with.
Difficult night for selectors, game could be won or lost in selection.
 
Would say
In: Lycett, Lord, Jonas, Duursma, Narkle
Out: Hayes, Dixon, McKenzie, JHF, Rioli

Mead training with 1s, Narkle with 2s, so maybe swap Narkle for Mead.
 
Mead training with 1s, Narkle with 2s, so maybe swap Narkle for Mead.
If this is true then the treatment of Narkle is bordering on bizarre. He's been impactful every time he's taken the field for us but keeps getting dropped for spuds.
 
It's dangerous to flirt with form, but imo we aren't really 'in form'. If we effectively tank a game to get some rest into sore boys I don't mind that much tbh.

I'm all for big changes for game day thread piss blasting.
 
It's dangerous to flirt with form, but imo we aren't really 'in form'. If we effectively tank a game to get some rest into sore boys I don't mind that much tbh.

plus getting some game time into the next tier.


I'm all for big changes for game day thread piss blasting.

I've missed a few game day threads so I'm looking for Saturday's game.
 
plus getting some game time into the next tier.




I've missed a few game day threads so I'm looking for Saturday's game.
I'm still giggling at the thought of Marshall slipping over on Dixon's piss blasts last Saturday.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top