Prediction Changes: Round 11 Vs Port Adelaide + pre-match discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

Had to read this three times before it made sense. 👍
I wish I had the talent to produce a graphic here explaining the skinny and fat sides of the ground by showing the crowd near the boundary where the ball is filled with fit folk and the side of the ground away from the ball filled with that guy from West Coast who had Michael O'Loughlin get in his face after kicking a goal.
 
Port fans that attended the Collingwood match at the MCG are not allowed to attend their home game against Freo this weekend.

'Anyone who has arrived in SA from the Greater Melbourne area in the last 14 days is not permitted to attend a Covid Management Plan event 14 days after arrival, that includes the footy at Adelaide Oval'

 

Log in to remove this ad.

Port fans that attended the Collingwood match at the MCG are not allowed to attend their home game against Freo this weekend.

'Anyone who has arrived in SA from the Greater Melbourne area in the last 14 days is not permitted to attend a Covid Management Plan event 14 days after arrival, that includes the footy at Adelaide Oval'

Only fair that Port have to leave out the 23 that played last game. They can field anyone else that's fit.
 
Only fair that Port have to leave out the 23 that played last game. They can field anyone else that's fit.

I'd love for the AFL to rule the game must go on but all players and staff involved can't be used.

Then I'd love Port to explode about it, wear their prison bar strip and then we belt the Port Magpies by 150 points - the AFL rules it a forfeit instead and we get awarded the four points without playing.

Just a total fustercluck
 
I know he won’t be back until
after the bye, but I would love to see Young play on a wing rather than HB. With his penetrating kicking, run and overhead marking he could dominate. Not sure how big his tank is but he’s got the build to have good endurance


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

I agree. Particularly if the club persists with Tucker at HB and sees him in that role long term, then Young definitely could fill a hole on the wing. Hopefully Cerra sticks around and makes the other wing his own and we’re set like a jelly on a cold night. Western and Chapman as back up. Then we can concentrate on bringing in forwards in this years draft.
 
I think they’re think bringing Meek in allows Darcy to go forward more often, he’s done ok when going forward this year. But I agree with Lycett out do we need two rucks, Treacy can give Darcy a chop out when needed. I would also like to see Blakley given a full game


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

Darcy is an okay forward at best. He’s close to top five rucks in the league already and he’s 22. Playing Meek and moving Darcy forward is robbing Peter to pay Paul.

If Meek was able to come in and play forward a large majority of the game I’d be happy to bring him in but he’s shown zero as a forward.

We’re better off resting Fyfe and Mundy forward and be considerable amount too.
 
Darcy is an okay forward at best. He’s close to top five rucks in the league already and he’s 22. Playing Meek and moving Darcy forward is robbing Peter to pay Paul.

If Meek was able to come in and play forward a large majority of the game I’d be happy to bring him in but he’s shown zero as a forward.

We’re better off resting Fyfe and Mundy forward and be considerable amount too.
Playing two out and out rucks always seems like a good idea till you actually do it.
 
Except for Natanui who’s basically doing what Sandi used to do except with swagger. You’ll get an All Australian nod then.
Darcy has plenty of swagger, and isn't also a massive dickhead.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Remove this Banner Ad

Prediction Changes: Round 11 Vs Port Adelaide + pre-match discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top