Changes v. Tigers (Rd 9) - Gawn, Riley in for Frawley, Byrnes

[Gysberts2Bate]

Blease is always entertaining but it wouldn't be fair on Clisby who should be ahead of him in the queue.

Different positions. Swap Terlich for Clisby and Byrnes for Blease.

 

[Blackas87]

Don't think Clibsy played on the weekend, not named in the review. Riley had another great game, 27 possies, has been probably the best consistent performer in the VFL, should be number 1 on the queue to come into the seniors.

 

[Theseventhhamster]

Different positions. Swap Terlich for Clisby and Byrnes for Blease.

Interestingly enough Blease has been playing off half back. Happy to have Blease in if Clisby and Riley get a gig too.

 

[Gysberts2Bate]

Don't think Clibsy played on the weekend, not named in the review. Riley had another great game, 27 possies, has been probably the best consistent performer in the VFL, should be number 1 on the queue to come into the seniors.

Was Clisby a senior emergency? That might be why, Gawn didn't play for the same reason.

Interestingly enough Blease has been playing off half back. Happy to have Blease in if Clisby and Riley get a gig too.

Yeah Blease has been playing there but he still doesn't have the defensive attributes to replace Terlich.

 

[Theseventhhamster]

Was Clisby a senior emergency? That might be why, Gawn didn't play for the same reason.
Yeah Blease has been playing there but he still doesn't have the defensive attributes to replace Terlich.

My mother has the defensive attributes to replace Terlich!

 

[Gysberts2Bate]

My mother has the defensive attributes to replace Terlich!

Can we sign her up?

 

[SuburbanMe]

 

[Djcjdees]

Blease is always entertaining but it wouldn't be fair on Clisby who should be ahead of him in the queue.

Yeah that seems to be the case. Fair call

 

[Theseventhhamster]

Can we sign her up?

She's probably not a better kick than DT so it would be a lateral move at best IMO.

 

[schmuttt]

Thing is with Blease, is if we drop Byrnes (Which we should) I think Salem or Blease as the sub and the other one starts on the ground. Don't think you can pick Clisby in that scenario, he needs to come in for Terlich or M Jones (And I think Terlich will play this week if declared fit).

 

[butters88]

Who do we have come in if Frawley isn't fit? Gawn? Fitzy? Or do we bring in Gorgeous and send Dunn forward?

 

[Dez!]

Who do we have come in if Frawley isn't fit? Gawn? Fitzy? Or do we bring in Gorgeous and send Dunn forward?

Won't be Fitzy, rolled his ankle in the first quarter for Casey last week and would be playing there again this week.

Probably Gawn and him and Jamar will ruck/forward.

 

[SuburbanMe]

I Wouldn't be opposed to bringing Gorgeous back this week.

He's slotted in well I reckon.

 

[butters88]

I Wouldn't be opposed to bringing Gorgeous back this week.

He's slotted in well I reckon.

This is probably what would happen... Not too bad I guess Gorgeous has a place in the side. Plus he might take out JR8 in his silent assassin role

 

[ThePuppetMaster]

I Wouldn't be opposed to bringing Gorgeous back this week.

He's slotted in well I reckon.

9 disposals in the VFL though - he had a role to play when Garland was out, but there's no match up for him if he's replacing a small defender IMO

 

[Dez!]

This is probably what would happen... Not too bad I guess Gorgeous has a place in the side. Plus he might take out JR8 in his silent assassin role

Um that wasn't my post.

Also why would we replace Frawley with Georgiou?

 

[butters88]

Um that wasn't my post.

Also why would we replace Frawley with Georgiou?

I dunno what happened there? I quoted your post re. Gawn WTF

 

[SuburbanMe]

9 disposals in the VFL though - he had a role to play when Garland was out, but there's no match up for him if he's replacing a small defender IMO

This is if Frawley is out and Dunn goes forward of course.

 

[SuburbanMe]

Um that wasn't my post.

Also why would we replace Frawley with Georgiou?

Frawley due to injury. You wouldn't just make that change for the hell of it. That'd be bonkers.

 

[Dez!]

Frawley due to injury. You wouldn't just make that change for the hell of it. That'd be bonkers.

I know that but Frawley is playing forward, so you'd be replacing Frawley the forward not Frawley the defender.

 

[SuburbanMe]

I know that but Frawley is playing forward, so you'd be replacing Frawley the forward not Frawley the defender.

I know. You'd maybe run Dunn or Judy up forward and replace them with gorgeous.

 

[Theseventhhamster]

We've got enough talls as is even if we don't have a deep forward. McDonald, Pedo and Garland can get it done Howe helping out in defense. Dawes, Dunn, Watts forward. Another mid if anything.

 

[SuburbanMe]

Run Howe off HB and give him some time up forward, do the same with pedo perhaps.

 

[CTHORANGE]

Won't be Fitzy, rolled his ankle in the first quarter for Casey last week and would be playing there again this week.

Probably Gawn and him and Jamar will ruck/forward.

If Gawn comes in to ruck/forward, that means Ped won't be required to help ruck / roam the ground which he has been doing so well at. Which means Ped might play forward all game, which scares me, a lot.

 

[SuburbanMe]

If Gawn comes in to ruck/forward, that means Ped won't be required to help ruck / roam the ground which he has been doing so well at. Which means Ped might play forward all game, which scares me, a lot.

He'd make a good step ladder for howe.