MRP / Trib. Charlie Cameron gets a week for dumping tackle on Lever - Tribunal = down to a fine.

[TY24]

Can't say I'm surprised, with the lifting motion it was always going to be touch and go for Charlie.

He's lucky Lever's head didn't impact the ground, could've been a much longer holiday otherwise.

 

[scoman]

Can't say I'm surprised, with the lifting motion it was always going to be touch and go for Charlie.

He's lucky Lever's head didn't impact the ground, could've been a much longer holiday otherwise.

Indeed, but considering Vlaustin and Greene escaped suspension last week its a bit annoying. Charlie's was graded as medium impact, whereas Vlaustins was graded as low impact, despite Butler staying down for a fair period of time. Greenes tackle, which drew an angry reaction from Andrew went without report!

 

[TY24]

Indeed, but considering Vlaustin and Greene escaped suspension last week its a bit annoying. Charlie's was graded as medium impact, whereas Vlaustins was graded as low impact, despite Butler staying down for a fair period of time. Greenes tackle, which drew an angry reaction from Andrew went without report!

Interesting, haven't seen those examples, I'll have to go have a look.

 

[scoman]

Interesting, haven't seen those examples, I'll have to go have a look.

MATCH REVIEW: Tiger fined, Greene in the clear

The Match Review findings for Sunday's round four games are in

www.afl.com.au

 

[Lets Roar like '44]

Medium impact. Surely the AFL are having a lend of us.

 

[JasRulz63]

MATCH REVIEW: Tiger fined, Greene in the clear

The Match Review findings for Sunday's round four games are in

www.afl.com.au

Not sure how the Greene one gets off without a fine, and Cameron gets a week for similar looking tackles. At worst, Cameron's was with a bit more force, but I can't see how one isn't deemed worthy of even a fine and the other is graded medium impact.

 

[Taylor]

You're able to apply more force when you shift the Lever. That's why it's medium, it's physics.

 

[BF Tiger]

Indeed, but considering Vlaustin and Greene escaped suspension last week its a bit annoying. Charlie's was graded as medium impact, whereas Vlaustins was graded as low impact, despite Butler staying down for a fair period of time. Greenes tackle, which drew an angry reaction from Andrew went without report!

Not sure how the Greene one gets off without a fine, and Cameron gets a week for similar looking tackles.

Came to say the same thing re: Toby Greene. Mac Andrew didn't enjoy it so much he gave away a free kick which resulted in a goal.

Need to see the Vlastuin one again.

Toby's tough tackle gets Sun fired up, MRO scrutiny looms

Toby Greene takes down Mac Andrew in a fiery tackle before the agile defender retaliates

www.afl.com.au

MATCH REVIEW: Tiger fined, Greene in the clear

The Match Review findings for Sunday's round four games are in

www.afl.com.au

 

[scoman]

Came to say the same thing re: Toby Greene. Mac Andrew didn't enjoy it so much he gave away a free kick which resulted in a goal.

Need to see the Vlastuin one again.

Yeah the Vlaustin one was more a merry go round affair, so a little different from the straight dumping style. Seemed to have more impact on Butler though, or at least similar, yet one is graded as low and the other medium.

 

[powerrrrrrrrrrrr]

You're able to apply more force when you shift the Lever. That's why it's medium, it's physics.

 

[BF Tiger]

Brisbane play Geelong next. Starting to make sense.
#tinfoilhat

 

[Sherrinator]

Greene gets nothing with one of the leagues worst records and Charlie gets a ban when he is probably the cleanest player out. Surely the Lions fight it using last week as precedence??

 

[Romeoh1]

Thought he might have gotten off that-line ball.

 

[PenfoldsFan]

You'd cop a week off for the opportunity to dump tackle Lever I reckon.

 

[Thedeftouch]

lol, if this is “medium impact” what does low impact look like? This will get downgraded on appeal

 

[eddiesmith]

Deserved at least a week, but it also shows how much of a lottery it is based on who you do it to.

The same tackle last year on Brayshaw and he’s facing 4-6 weeks on the sidelines.

 

[Elixuh]

FFS I pay good money to hear country roads at the Gabba every second week.

 

[Demon in Hell]

Lucky with one, deserved two at least.

 

[scoman]

Lucky with one, deserved two at least.

Maybe, but why do you think impact was graded as medium considering Lever bounced straight up and last weeks incidents were ungraded (Greene) and low impact (Vlaustin)?

 

[Sherrinator]

Lucky with one, deserved two at least.

Watching the replay and it is clear that Lever pushed off with his legs to get the other Lion off his arm and forced Cameron’s tackle forward. No impact and no intent from the tackler on this occasion.

 

[Demon in Hell]

This is exactly the type of tackle is trying to get out of the game.

If you thought Melbourne were silly taking Kossi to the tribunal then Brisbane would look incompetent in challenging this.

 

[scoman]

This is exactly the type of tackle is trying to get out of the game.

If you thought Melbourne were silly taking Kossi to the tribunal then Brisbane would look incompetent in challenging this.

They why didn't they penalise Greene and Vlaustin from last week?

 

[Demon in Hell]

Because they werent danderous tackles.

 

[scoman]

Because they werent danderous tackles.

Why not? Both involved a slinging action and both resulted in a player being hurt/ upset as they had been dumped on their head. Vlaustin was fined only because his was graded as low impact, despite Butler staying down for a short while.

 

[Demon in Hell]

Neither player was dumped on their head an neither were distressed. Go view the replay.

Cameron swung Levers head into the ground. Go view the replay.