Jimmy BCFTWGuy that can barely move, take front position or run gets some ludicrous cred for occupying a defender lol you idiots have lost the plot, lets see how all this goes in a final.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 3 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Jimmy BCFTWGuy that can barely move, take front position or run gets some ludicrous cred for occupying a defender lol you idiots have lost the plot, lets see how all this goes in a final.
It should be compulsory for anti Dixon posts to include who you want in the team instead because it's the difference between your post making sense and your post not making sense.
If you want Lord then fair.
If you want Marshall then open season to rip your post to shreds.
It is a very negative Hinkley way to play the game.
Guy that can barely move, take front position or run gets some ludicrous cred for occupying a defender lol you idiots have lost the plot, lets see how all this goes in a final.
The idea of the decoy is great, only difference is Warren could get up the ground and was quite handy up the ground in those finals too. His QF and GF games (first half especially) were underrated even though he didn't kick the goals.Like when Williams used Tredrea as a decoy in the 2004 finals series? Sooo negative and got us nowhere...
Agree. Laughable.Lets compare one of the greatest CHF's of all time who could move to a broken down bollard.
Whilst Dixon is the human embodiment of a bollard, he is still taking the oppositions no.1 defender each week, and if left unchecked still has the size and strength to kick a bag on his day.
This isn't excusing his performances, but tell me how well Sav & George go on Friday if they were stood by Weitering instead of McGovern or Kemp? He may be a shell of his former self, but as long as he keeps taking the no.1 defender and making a contest which then allows the other forwards to play on the 2nd & 3rd bananas he is doing his job.
Lets compare one of the greatest CHF's of all time who could move to a broken down bollard.
He gave it his best. It was a tough ask.Agree. Laughable.
I prefer Timmy G's - Chase, Tackle, Harass and Get in Front Todd Marshall - over Hot Toddy.Dixon's body is physically cooked beyond repair but he's still having a better season than Hot Toddy simply because he actually competes and gives relentless effort. Yes it's pretty pathetic that this is enough to make you best 22 but it is.
Fev. If unavailable, Jason Dunstall instead.It should be compulsory for anti Dixon posts to include who you want in the team instead
Dixon is not playing as a decoy. He's playing as a broken down Holden Commodore. He's like Jed. The opposition are not too worried about him at all and looking to efficiently gouge him into oblivion.The only thing that is laughable is that I was comparing Tredrea at his peak to Dixon at the end of his career. I did no such thing. I simply reminded a couple of posters scoffing at the tactic that it did successfully help us to a premiership.
Like it or not, Dixon is the only KPF we have who absolutely commands the oppositions no 1 KPD. Even at the end of his career, cooked and 33. Statistically he is arguably still our second most potent key forward and a better 2nd ruck than any other option we have by a long way. Sad but true.
If Dixon can play convincingly as a decoy while snagging some goals if left relatively unattended its a strategy that is just as viable as any other if the best possible finish to the season and any finals we might play is in the clubs best interests. Sadly I don't think it is.
You're going to have to be more specific.What the hell was that contest last week where he sorta leaned back from behind his opponent & attempted a fresh air mark lol the ball wasn't anywhere near him.
Competitive comschmetitive there were at least three embarrassingly bad Dixon moments last week I can't believe haven't been giffed..
Weitering staying aware of him because he's a giant lump doesn't really equate to being competitive.
Yes it was painful watching him take 6 marks against Richmond. 5 contested, 5 inside 50.Dixon is not playing as a decoy. He's playing as a broken down Holden Commodore. He's like Jed. The opposition are not too worried about him at all and looking to efficiently gouge him into oblivion.
I get he's trying his butt off but it is just painful to watch. He struggles to mark and sometimes even get up.
Opposition coaching staffs have exploited him during the year and will continue to do so and will hone in him during the finals when matchups are essential with Hinkley having an exceedingly bad record with matchups in general.
When the finals come round, I don't wish it on him, but the increased intensity of his already corpse of a body might break him in half especially if we need him to perform Herculean efforts in the ruck.
If we had a decent 2nd ruck option, he would be out the door and this is another type of player I would like to pick up on the quiet.
Whilst Dixon is the human embodiment of a bollard, he is still taking the oppositions no.1 defender each week, and if left unchecked still has the size and strength to kick a bag on his day.
This isn't excusing his performances, but tell me how well Sav & George go on Friday if they were stood by Weitering instead of McGovern or Kemp? He may be a shell of his former self, but as long as he keeps taking the no.1 defender and making a contest which then allows the other forwards to play on the 2nd & 3rd bananas he is doing his job.