- May 3, 2015
- 3,428
- 7,581
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Cubs Blackhawks Fulham Ivanhoe FC
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
trade for Fields and then flip pick 3 for a haul might not be a terrible ideaWonder if New England will be on fields now that jones has been traded ?
An upgrade on Mac but not significantly.trade for Fields and then flip pick 3 for a haul might not be a terrible idea
But is Fields really any good?
Swift has played behind elite OL's his whole career, interested to see how this works out now he isnt (currently, that could change by the end of the offseason with the draft) Hopefully more successful than it was for the Panthers and Miles Sanders. Couldn't be any worse.All that cap space and only confirmed signing is Swift.
Got paid plenty after a down year too I notice, and I didn’t feel RB was a pressing need.
Can only hope OL / WR help is in the pipelines
I thought the same thing, but actually checked and seems Monty had a change of heart when offered the bears deal and signed on at the Lions for a similar dealInteresting that Poles signed Swift for what he did after letting Monty walk for less last offseason.
If they don’t , then Williams ( presuming we take him) and Swift will get battered by good run defenses just like Fields does.Swift has played behind elite OL's his whole career, interested to see how this works out now he isnt (currently, that could change by the end of the offseason with the draft) Hopefully more successful than it was for the Panthers and Miles Sanders. Couldn't be any worse.
80% of Chicago are going to be pissedifwhen Poles trades pick 1 and sticks with Fields.
2xWR, Edge, DT, C & OT in first 2 days with the haul plus future 1st.
He wasnt taking us anywhere speedy80% of Chicago are going to be pissedifwhen Poles trades pick 1 and sticks with Fields.
2xWR, Edge, DT, C & OT in first 2 days with the haul plus future 1st.
Hard to assess a QB when he’s surrounded by trash.He wasnt taking us anywhere speedy
I’m not a hater and will always say he didn’t get a good opportunity while here to flourish , but cmon mate he’s limited
You are in denial. You can say he was surrounded by trash but the Bears had a better winning percentage with backup QBs starting during Fields time in Chicago than with Fields. When has that ever happened for a QB you can win with long term?Hard to assess a QB when he’s surrounded by trash.
Poles s**t his pants, even if Caleb is the next Mahones (which he won’t be), our rebuild is only half finished. Thin O line, thin D line and still only have 1 WR in the medium to long term. How do we address all those needs with picks 9, 75 and a 4th rounder?
With the draft haul we could have easily drafted 4 starters including one of the best 3 WR’s. Plus plenty of depth and also massive draft capital in 2025.
My thoughts on JF are based on statistical analysis which I have posted earlier, not highlight plays. I hope he gets a chance to prove himself at the steelers.You are in denial. You can say he was surrounded by trash but the Bears had a better winning percentage with backup QBs starting during Fields time in Chicago than with Fields. When has that ever happened for a QB you can win with long term?
The fact Getsy got another job and Fields went for a 6th rounder tells you all you need to know. Unlike fans, NFL evaluators aren't seduced by highlight plays, they look at if someone can do the basics, stay on script, timing throws, can read defenses and get the ball out quick, throw guys open , not turn the ball over etc etc. . all things Fields still struggles with/lacks consistency with after year 3.