IMO Judd did not deserve AA last year, just like he did not deserve the Brownlow.
IMO your opinion is absolute rubbish.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
IMO Judd did not deserve AA last year, just like he did not deserve the Brownlow.
If Judd, Ablett & Buddy were available in a trade, most Carlton supporters would take Buddy 10/10 times.
IMO your opinion is absolute rubbish.
If Judd, Ablett & Buddy were available in a trade, most Carlton supporters would take Buddy 10/10 times. As a Collingwood supporter, I'm jealous that Hawthorn supporters get to enjoy watching him.
As for Judd & Ablett, the minimal difference b/w them & Pendlebury & Swan is minimal.
IMO your opinion is absolute rubbish.
A lot of people were questioning the brownlow's validity last year after Judd won. 3 Votes in a 50 points loss to the premier is laughable.
On the flip side, Judd should have won the brownlow this year, and didn't poll votes in games he should have, so it all balances out.
If I had to choose Wayne Carey or Buddy Franklin at the same age, I'd take Carey every day of the week. Carey also played in the golden era of key defenders in the AFL, there has been scant quality defenders in the Buddy era compared to whom Carey faced.
And yes, I rate Simon Black's career higher then Cousins, cause he was more consistent over a longer period of time.
Back on topic Hawthorn fans have a warped and bitter hate for Judd for some reason.
No he shouldn't have. Mitchell should have won it followed by Dal Santo or Swan.
I rated Pendlebury's season ahead of Swan and Mitchell, but you have to be taking the piss if you think Dal Santo had a better season than Judd.
Dal Santo had the luxury of not having any teammates steal votes off him, but how he managed to rack up 28 votes this season in a average season does show the flaws of the current voting system
Dal Santo had the luxury of not having any teammates steal votes off him
Dal Santo had the luxury of not having any teammates steal votes off him, but how he managed to rack up 28 votes this season in a average season does show the flaws of the current voting system
^ How Swan was better than Pendlebury has me beat...
I rated Pendlebury's season ahead of Swan and Mitchell, but you have to be taking the piss if you think Dal Santo had a better season than Judd.
Dal Santo had the luxury of not having any teammates steal votes off him, but how he managed to rack up 28 votes this season in a average season does show the flaws of the current voting system
If I had to choose Wayne Carey or Buddy Franklin at the same age, I'd take Carey every day of the week. Carey also played in the golden era of key defenders in the AFL, there has been scant quality defenders in the Buddy era compared to whom Carey faced.
And yes, I rate Simon Black's career higher then Cousins, cause he was more consistent over a longer period of time.
Back on topic Hawthorn fans have a warped and bitter hate for Judd for some reason.
If I had to choose Wayne Carey or Buddy Franklin at the same age, I'd take Carey every day of the week. Carey also played in the golden era of key defenders in the AFL, there has been scant quality defenders in the Buddy era compared to whom Carey faced.
And yes, I rate Simon Black's career higher then Cousins, cause he was more consistent over a longer period of time.
Back on topic Hawthorn fans have a warped and bitter hate for Judd for some reason.
Which gets back to the bane of these debates, comparing eras. I saw G Ablett senior play as well as Dermie as well as Carey as well as Blight so for me, at least Franklin is not as good as Carey nor others.
You clearly have a man crush on Judd and ignore everyones opinion if it does not line up with yours.
You must be shattered he never won the umpires award on Monday night.
That's a funny one. Because Franklins 2008 and 2011 rate almost better than any season Carey had stats wise. Franklin did this in the days of lower scoring games where key forwards have less of an impact, because of zones and presses. It's much, much, much harder for a key forward these days.
I mean, could you imagine Franklin and Cloke being left one out with all that space Carey, Dunstall, Lockett and co got, and were also left one out like those guys. I daresay, that Cloke & Franklin would run absolutely riot, season after season.
Back on topic Hawthorn fans have a warped and bitter hate for Judd for some reason.
A lot of people were questioning the brownlow's validity last year after Judd won. 3 Votes in a 50 points loss to the premier is laughable.
But in the days of Carey, the defenders could near kill a key forward without conceding the free kick. If Franklin played on the defenders in those days, then he would have to play to entirely different rules.
Also the sports science in Carey's days was basic, if at all existent, so how much better would he have been these days. Nobody can say.
I'm happy to say that if Carey played today, he would do well and if Franklin played in Carey's time, he'd do okay.
That's why comparing eras is flawed. It's like saying Fred Fanning or Gordon Coventrywould be a champion today. Their performances would say yes but there's no way to compare them adequately.
Back on topic Hawthorn fans have a warped and bitter hate for Judd for some reason.