Chris Scott - Hold that loss

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
The only reason they are always there about is they are gifted wins at their velodrome

Here's the 8 games they won this year at GMHBA - which of these were gifted wins?
  • 5th - West Coast (Geelong also beat them at MCG)
  • 7th - Bulldogs
  • 11th - Adelaide (Geelong also beat them in Adelaide)
  • 12th - North Melbourne (Geelong also beat them at Marvel)
  • 14th - St Kilda
  • 15th - Sydney (Geelong also beat them in Sydney)
  • 16th - Carlton
  • 17th - Melbourne
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Why would he give them a bake? It was Scott that had Blicavs inexplicably up on a wing, and Danger hiding in the forward line when they needed to wrestle the momentum back.
You watch football yeah? If you did, you’d have some insight in what he was trying to achieve. Keep in mind it was the coaching team that had them four goals up st half time against a side that was $1.30 odds on with the bookies. But yeah, I know it’s popular to take shots at C Scott. Take a number and get in line sweetheart.
 
From my lounge room, not having Dangerfield in the guts in the third quarter, and not having Blicavs on Lynch from the first bounce seems dumb. I would like to think it is a bit more complicated than that... but maybe it isn't. I dunno...
Mate, how were the boys this week? Were they up and about? You seem to be close to them. Share with me your insights. You’re obviously an astute football follower. Give me the feel. Come on. You know you want to.
 
Can't think of a more ungracious coach that's been involved in the game, won't take responsibility as we saw with his comments a few weeks ago, busted blatantly lying a while back, just a sh!t person.

Yeah Farang, I thought the same watching his presser tonight. Of course it’s every losing coach’s prerogative to be disappointed and maybe internally livid at the result, but what a miserable, bitter and twisted response to the media and the viewers that was. Hardly a single syllable of genuine congratulations to the victor, just loathing of all in his midst and watching. Really poor form I thought.
 
Pathetic coaching performance.

I hate the Tigers, but seeing that flog Chris Scott get his comeuppance was nice.
Ignorance is bliss. Happy to elaborate. But first, enlighten me as to how that was a pathetic coaching performance. You know, the performance that saw Geelong within two kicks with 5 minutes to go against a side that was $1.30 on with the bookies to roll us with Hawkins and Duncan out. Yet somehow we found ourselves in it up to our necks. Please, provide me your wisdom.
 
You watch football yeah? If you did, you’d have some insight in what he was trying to achieve. Keep in mind it was the coaching team that had them four goals up st half time against a side that was $1.30 odds on with the bookies. But yeah, I know it’s popular to take shots at C Scott. Take a number and get in line sweetheart.

Lulz.

Everyone that watched the game questioned the decision to play your best KPD up the ground, especially when the oppositions best KPF was running rampant. What a masterstroke.

I'm loving your ironically condescending posts though. Gimme more. Break it down for me azyboy of the interweb.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Lulz.

Everyone that watched the game questioned the decision to play your best KPD up the ground, especially when the oppositions best KPF was running rampant. What a masterstroke.

I'm loving your ironically condescending posts though. Gimme more. Break it down for me azyboy of the interweb.
You had me at interweb. Please. Run along.
 
Ignorance is bliss. Happy to elaborate. But first, enlighten me as to how that was a pathetic coaching performance. You know, the performance that saw Geelong within two kicks with 5 minutes to go against a side that was $1.30 on with the bookies to roll us with Hawkins and Duncan out. Yet somehow we found ourselves in it up to our necks. Please, provide me your wisdom.
Playing one of your best key defenders on a wing (which didn't really work last week) while the opposition tall forward ran rampant, stranding your best midfielder in the forward line when the opposition started to gain momentum out of the centre clearances, and playing a donkey like Lachie Henderson at full forward (when was the last time he played that role at AFL level?) were particularly silly decisions.

Lynch kicked 5, Danger had 8 touches after half time and Henderson had 5 touches and no impact.
 
Why would he give them a bake? It was Scott that had Blicavs inexplicably up on a wing, and Danger hiding in the forward line when they needed to wrestle the momentum back.
The same move that had them 3 goals up at half time and in a winning position? Your football logic astounds me Judd2Sewell. Let us bow to your wisdom oh great one.
 
Playing one of your best key defenders on a wing (which didn't really work last week) while the opposition tall forward ran rampant, stranding your best midfielder in the forward line when the opposition started to gain momentum out of the centre clearances, and playing a donkey like Lachie Henderson at full forward (when was the last time he played that role at AFL level?) were particularly silly decisions.

Lynch kicked 5, Danger had 8 touches after half time and Henderson had 5 touches and no impact.

Wrong. azyboy just knows better. He said so himself.
 
The same move that had them 3 goals up at half time and in a winning position? Your football logic astounds me Judd2Sewell. Let us bow to your wisdom oh great one.

I didn't realise that they only played half the game. I must have missed that.

Yes, the same move that had you blow a 21 point halftime lead. The same move that saw Lynch run rampant. The same move that contributed to Richmond's domination after half time. The same move that didn't work last week. That same move that has everyone questioning it, including your fellow supporters, bar you.

What a moron. You've got nothing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top