Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Listening to that I think it's very much a case of he doesn't want to go to WC.Wow listening to this Sheezel did initially sound against our club ? Maybe I was wrong to discount the homesickness rumour. Maybe there is truth to it after all ?
Sometimes it's good to let someone make a decision for you. I'd be happy for Norf to bid for Ashcroft (their history says they may not) and then take Sheezel. Removes temptation.
Lot of point to bidding.How does the bidding actually work? If north bid on Ashcroft, Brisbane match it and use their first?
What happens if north don’t bid. Then we could bid at him and Brisbane could still take him if they match? If so, is there any real point to bidding?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
that interview was a few months ago but at the time I just assumed he hasn't talked to us at that particular timeListening to that I think it's very much a case of he doesn't want to go to WC.
Unlike some of recent times who have basically tampered with the draft by saying as much, he's playing it a little more subtly, a lot smarter. Letting it be known that he'll play the game but that's not what he wants.
Letting WC know not to take him without telling WC not to take him and having draft tampering questions raised.
I don't have any contact or info on this but just touching on the Sheezel/WA/Home thing. He does give away a quick little insight into his own personal leanings and feelings answering a question at the 6min 40sec mark here: .
The rumours aren't entirely made up or unfounded. His natural inclination and internal processing is that he's not really a fan of the West Coast idea. He's had more interviews and had more explained about housing and opportunities etc since and is slowly "growing up" regarding all the realities but it is known that he's not particularly keen on it. Take that for what it's worth.
Fair enough, I just like a bit of parochialism floating around in the team.IMO we are a very poor wet weather side, has been a long term weakness in the playing list that needs looking at. So drafting some Vic or SA wet weather players does address that. Hence my interest in Phillapou, Oli Hotton and Darcy Jones a WA lad who does well in wet conditions.
Culley hopefully brings some of that skill set too.
We dont want an all WA midfield. Need a solid mix.
Sheezel or warlord if we keep pick 2What are peoples thoughts on who we should take with our first pick in the draft?
I’m warming to Cadman..
Fair enough, I just like a bit of parochialism floating around in the team.
I really liked what I saw of Darcy Jones in the u/18’s, I have a family connection to Kaleb Smith (they’re also one eyed WC), so I’m a bit biased there but he’s quick and very talented.
I thought Ginbey looked a good size for midfielder and relished the physical contact.
I’m really positive about our draft hand and hope the recruiters nail it, obviously as all supporters do.
The one thing I’ve learned following the draft and being 50yrs old, is that it never goes as I would like, which is ok. I actually thought Andrew McDougall and Tom Swift were going to be guns, would have chucked money on it, hahaha.Love your choices. Those 3 would be perfect for us.
You're not an orphan re those 2.I actually thought Andrew McDougall and Tom Swift were going to be guns, would have chucked money on it, hahaha.
I dont think we have ever had a great half fwd?Also, I’m sorry but I can’t understand why anyone wants to kick off a long rebuild by spending pick 2 on a half forward, you can find those later in the draft and grow them somewhat easily
Sheezel is quality no doubt and very exciting but he’s a cherry on top type addition
A pure midfielder or MAYBE Cadman are the only acceptable options for me personally
That's exactly how I took it - he didn't want to be drawn talking about a specific club this far out.When Sheezle said, "I'm not sure about West Coast, that might be a bit far off." It did kinda sound bad, but I think he meant the draft is a bit far away to start thinking about individual clubs, not that we are physically too far away. He followed up by saying he was happy to go anywhere to play footy.
Hopefully it's all moot anyway and we grab the warlord
This is a valid line of thought, but you'd expect with a few preseasons under his belt he'll become a pure ball using mid.Also, I’m sorry but I can’t understand why anyone wants to kick off a long rebuild by spending pick 2 on a half forward, you can find those later in the draft and grow them somewhat easily
Sheezel is quality no doubt and very exciting but he’s a cherry on top type addition
A pure midfielder or MAYBE Cadman are the only acceptable options for me personally
This is a valid line of thought, but you'd expect with a few preseasons under his belt he'll become a pure ball using mid.
Whether he'll be a hard ball get type mid is the question and you are correct that perhaps Harry the Cheezle may never fit that mould.
And this is why North are shit. They have had a few years now where their leadership/direction has been completely lacking. Was supposed to be fixed with Clarkson, and then.....Lot of point to bidding.
Makes Brisbane pay a fairer price for the standout of the draft.
Ashcrost is considered the best player in the draft and would go at #1 if no matching f/s etc.
If Norf bid Brisbane can take him with a match for points at a 20% discount.
Instaed of using pick 1 (which they don't have) they get to pay 3000 - 20% = 2400 points of match. This would include pick 15? I think they have. Still a bargain.
If Norf don't bid and we do, Brisbane get him at 20% discount to the value of pick 2 and so on.
If for some reason no-one bids on him Brisbane take best available from the rest of the pool at their 1st round pick and leave him on the shelf until either someone bids (and they match -20%) of take him with their final live pick.
Norf have a habit of not bidding. Last year they failed to bid on Daicos and Collingwood got him even cheaper.
In 2020 they did worse. At pick 3 they should have 'taken' Braeden Campbell (Swans academy) and forced a match from Sydney which would have included Sydney using their pick 4, then gone with Will Phillips who they wanted anyway.
Instead they went straight to Phillips and Sydney took MacDonald with pick 4. GCS then bid for Campbell and Sydney matched using later picks. This gave Sydney picks 4 and 5 in the draft when they should have only got Campbell with pick 4. MacDonald was a freebie provided by no-one bidding on their academy guy.
I only want Cadman if we think we can fix his goalkicking, it's supposedly diabolical... Pick 2 is a lot to pay for a forward who can't kick.If we were to keep 2 I’m torn about Wardlaw or Cadman. On one hand I see the benefit of drafting a CHF this year on the other we need match winning midfielders.
If we get Cadman I feel we’re better off packaging 2 of our seconds or a second and third for another pick in the teens to get a midfielder in Hewett, Ginbey or whoever else is there.
If we get Wardlaw at 2 are there any KPP of value in the second round? Do we take the punt on Keeler at 20?
Disclaimer I don’t watch draft, just going by others opinions on players
I only want Cadman if we think we can fix his goalkicking, it's supposedly diabolical... Pick 2 is a lot to pay for a forward who can't kick.