Politics Climate Change Paradox (cont in part 2)

Should we act now, or wait for a unified global approach


  • Total voters
    362

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
There's the reverse battery flow factor too - the industry proposal for EVs to operate as a second home battery for detached dwellings where possible.
It certainly provides options to home owners, it's also a challenge how we integrate EVs and these kinds of tech for apartment owners.

Going to be interesting to see it role out, you would think if the Govt were serious an NBN style project to provide charging in the inner city will be needed, and in regional areas whilst batteries develop longer range
 
It certainly provides options to home owners, it's also a challenge how we integrate EVs and these kinds of tech for apartment owners.

Going to be interesting to see it role out, you would think if the Govt were serious an NBN style project to provide charging in the inner city will be needed, and in regional areas whilst batteries develop longer range
Chargepoint are doing it already.
Like the coal power plant shutdowns, for all the rage at government(s) for doing too much or not enough, it's the market driving most change. Banks largely aren't funding coal plants (China's plants are government funded) and the the vehicle industry itself is switching to EV production or eco fuel production.

The people complaining about change are just King Canute shouting at the tide and getting wet.
 

Apparently

Let's hope going woke, they won't go broke. Or we are all stuffed 🤣

The last thing you would want to be doing in a war zone is sitting stationary for a prolonged period of time re-charging the vehicle.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

There is still yet to be a solution for recycling or re-manufacturing batteries.

The strategy does include new initiatives to better enable charging networks for people living in apartment buildings, a "national mapping tool" to identify where charging stations are most needed, training on EVs for emergency service workers and preparing recycling systems to reuse EV batteries and other components of the vehicles.
Which is why it's good they've noted that and included it as part of the strategy as it needs to be considered
 
Which is why it's good they've noted that and included it as part of the strategy as it needs to be considered
Well that's great, pity no one in the world has managed to economically recycle lithium batteries, but it's part of a strategy that they have noted and are considering.
 
Well that's great, pity no one in the world has managed to economically recycle lithium batteries, but it's part of a strategy that they have noted and are considering.
I've tried to understand what this comment means.

I'm assuming you aren't suggesting because it hasn't happened yet, it can't. Because that would be a stupid thong to say.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)



Some more research for people to ignore.
I’m sure it’s all happening as described, in this and other linked articles. The real problem is that nothing can be done about it, except boost the infrastructure to deal with individual incidents. Unless you have any other suggestions?
 
I’m sure it’s all happening as described, in this and other linked articles. The real problem is that nothing can be done about it, except boost the infrastructure to deal with individual incidents. Unless you have any other suggestions?

Must protect billionaire's profits at all costs. Who cares what mess they leave behind?
 
I’m sure it’s all happening as described, in this and other linked articles. The real problem is that nothing can be done about it, except boost the infrastructure to deal with individual incidents. Unless you have any other suggestions?
I mean we could work out a way to stop being the cause out it.

So we could focus on potentially mitigating the times its natural.

But hey, that's just me.
 
I mean we could work out a way to stop being the cause out it.

So we could focus on potentially mitigating the times its natural.

But hey, that's just me.
Fine. The only way it might “work” is for the entire world to commit to a plan of action over the next 100 years. Not going to happen. Australia eliminating its 1% share of emissions by tomorrow will do nothing. A serious mitigation plan is our only other option.
 
Fine. The only way it might “work” is for the entire world to commit to a plan of action over the next 100 years. Not going to happen. Australia eliminating its 1% share of emissions by tomorrow will do nothing. A serious mitigation plan is our only other option.
The rest of the world is already moving towards renewables and trying on reduce carbon.

It's not just about our 1% 🙄
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top