If he says he's not going anywhere it's probably not worth itNever said he was. But that doesn’t mean it’s not worth asking the question.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
If he says he's not going anywhere it's probably not worth itNever said he was. But that doesn’t mean it’s not worth asking the question.
It means Sydney value him more than Melbourne did.So somehow Grundy’s value has increased in value this despite being a VFL player.
Witts to GC for pick 3 million…Yep, 2018 future R2 for Murray (who hadn't played a game) ended up costing pick 37 - more a reflection on how bad that trade was than the Adams trade.
Better yet, Shultz went at pick 57 in 2018... could have got him then instead of Murray!
I doubt Schultz is owed what we would've paid Adams next year. He's also younger and arguably (actually, not that much argument is needed) better in the same position.So I guess we can offer pick 33 to Freo for contracted Schultz but if we take the whole of his salary it'll be worth it for them?
Rumours about Jamie?
And LiccaAnd Shane Morwood in 1990!
Yes! They just might be our academy!And Licca
You have to look at the big picture with draft picks. Pick 33 is 563 points whilst pick 23 is 815 points. Theres not a great difference if you're trading picks in and out. We at BF only look at being 10 picks higher in the draft as the value.
Wright has shown a big picture mentality so let's judge the Adams 33 when this is all over. If say he uses the points value then the 252 points is not a huge difference in getting the deal done.
I thought this was going to be a quiet trade period where we only went to the draft to pick draftees and delist accordingly.
Who would have thought Adams and Schultz were in play. Whats next? Lol
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
That is WAY oversWhat do we reckon will get the Shultz trade done? 19+33?
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
We would likely get a pick mid 40s back to give us a 2nd pick to use. 19 and 33 only would be too much.What do we reckon will get the Shultz trade done? 19+33?
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
I think the city of Sydney is, we've done well out of GWS too.Yes! They just might be our academy!
I wouldn't say we were ripped off, I will say we never seem to get overs in any deals
Let's not jump the gun here. Hamling sucks ass. Adams helps, but he's no Mills, who he'll be replacing for a large portion of the season due to injury. In theory Grundy makes them better, but I don't know if they vault into the top 4 based on these moves.Disappointed we helped make Sydney a contender again and all we got was pick 33. I guess the club just did the right thing by Adams or maybe there was a lot of contract to pay on Adams contract next year that we were happy to avoid.
If you don’t ask, you’ll never know. At the minimum the benefit is that it makes Geelong cough up a little more for him.If he says he's not going anywhere it's probably not worth it
Wouldn't be surprised if it's 19 and and one of the 30's picks for Schultz and 45.That is WAY overs
Pick 19 is the deal. Maybe a swap of other picks if they want more
You're making too much sense.Seems about par when you remove the emotional side of it. A 30 year old inside mid, with an injury history behind him, that was probably going to have a few youngster look to move past him - a mid second rounder seems about right.
Would've loved 25 - would've loathed 44, we've landed in the middle. Thanks for everything Tay!