List Mgmt. Our Trade/FA, Suburban & Country Town Thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

I've spoken about it on Reddit recently, but if we know Richards is likely heading to Alberton we should be taking advantage of that.

Miles Bergman is heavily linked to return to Victoria after this season or next year and Collingwood were interested in offering him a longterm deal this time last year.

Which makes sense, he's young, proven and can play in defence, on ball or on the wing. Potentially freeing up Noble and Quaynor to push higher up the ground and also providing a younger option through the middle.

A consensus seems that he would be worth a late first round pick? I'm not entirely sure he's quote worth that but it doesn't sound entirely unreasonable.

I believe if we were to package pick 32 (or another pick we could acquire in the future) along with Richards, we could get the deal done.

Even if you really lowballed Richards' value at pick 50 (we certainly would want more for him and Port offering 4 years would imply they value him higher than that), using DraftGuru's pick calculator pick 32 + pick 50 would be valued the same as pick 22, which is entirely reasonable for Bergman.

I believe Richards would be valued higher than pick 50 however, and so in conjunction with pick 32 would be an even better deal for Port than the previous hypothetical.



On SM-A146P using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
As far as I'm aware Reef McInnes and Nathan Kreuger are both still unsigned. What would be their trade value and who would be their suitors?
 
asongofnightsandliars said:
I've spoken about it on Reddit recently, but if we know Richards is likely heading to Alberton we should be taking advantage of that.

Miles Bergman is heavily linked to return to Victoria after this season or next year and Collingwood were interested in offering him a longterm deal this time last year.

Which makes sense, he's young, proven and can play in defence, on ball or on the wing. Potentially freeing up Noble and Quaynor to push higher up the ground and also providing a younger option through the middle.

A consensus seems that he would be worth a late first round pick? I'm not entirely sure he's quote worth that but it doesn't sound entirely unreasonable.

I believe if we were to package pick 32 (or another pick we could acquire in the future) along with Richards, we could get the deal done.

Even if you really lowballed Richards' value at pick 50 (we certainly would want more for him and Port offering 4 years would imply they value him higher than that), using DraftGuru's pick calculator pick 32 + pick 50 would be valued the same as pick 22, which is entirely reasonable for Bergman.

I believe Richards would be valued higher than pick 50 however, and so in conjunction with pick 32 would be an even better deal for Port than the previous hypothetical.



On SM-A146P using BigFooty.com mobile app
Click to expand...
 
asongofnightsandliars said:
I've spoken about it on Reddit recently, but if we know Richards is likely heading to Alberton we should be taking advantage of that.

Miles Bergman is heavily linked to return to Victoria after this season or next year and Collingwood were interested in offering him a longterm deal this time last year.

Which makes sense, he's young, proven and can play in defence, on ball or on the wing. Potentially freeing up Noble and Quaynor to push higher up the ground and also providing a younger option through the middle.

A consensus seems that he would be worth a late first round pick? I'm not entirely sure he's quote worth that but it doesn't sound entirely unreasonable.

I believe if we were to package pick 32 (or another pick we could acquire in the future) along with Richards, we could get the deal done.

Even if you really lowballed Richards' value at pick 50 (we certainly would want more for him and Port offering 4 years would imply they value him higher than that), using DraftGuru's pick calculator pick 32 + pick 50 would be valued the same as pick 22, which is entirely reasonable for Bergman.

I believe Richards would be valued higher than pick 50 however, and so in conjunction with pick 32 would be an even better deal for Port than the previous hypothetical.



On SM-A146P using BigFooty.com mobile app
Click to expand...
Is that you Kinda?
 
Frampton17 said:
Richards + Pick 32 for Bergman + 2nd Rounder?
Click to expand...
We have Pick 30 at the moment
Port have pick 32

So you are saying Richards + Pick 30 for Bergman + Pick 32
Berman is highly rated, played ~70 more AFL games was a former Pick 14 and is 3 years younger than Richards.

I wouldn't be doing that trade from a Port point of view.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Couch Coach said:
We have Pick 30 at the moment
Port have pick 32

So you are saying Richards + Pick 30 for Bergman + Pick 32
Berman is highly rated, played ~70 more AFL games was a former Pick 14 and is 3 years younger than Richards.

I wouldn't be doing that trade from a Port point of view.
Click to expand...
Ahhh ZeroHanger is out of date in what picks teams have.

If we have 30, I am suggesting 30 + Richards for only Bergman. Not for them to send us a pick and Bergman.

On SM-A146P using BigFooty.com mobile app
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. Our Trade/FA, Suburban & Country Town Thread

Similar threads

SchuPie
Trade + FA targets 2024
2 3 4 5 6
Replies
148
Views
10K
Pedro
Pedro
G
Our Season So Far
Replies
9
Views
583
GoPies1
G
jmac70
Analysis 2024 Brownlow medal - Our boy Nick
37 38 39 40 41
Replies
1K
Views
20K
Kirby
Kirby
Quicky
Throwing Darts: Our Depth Inside Mids
Replies
14
Views
456
Drought Break
D
Exambolor
Autopsy Collingwood Past Trades Circular Discussion
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
Jelly Bean
Jelly Bean
76woodenspooners
Analysis Have we got too much cheese on our lasagna?
Replies
24
Views
1K
HoraceStrasbork
HoraceStrasbork
Markfs
Autopsy The famous 2024 Whipping Boy Thread
11 12 13 14 15
Replies
365
Views
14K
Markfs
Markfs

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top