- Sep 26, 2012
- 36,378
- 56,217
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Agreed we should stop trading future firsts
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
List Mgmt. Our Trade/FA, Suburban & Country Town Thread
- Thread starter Jen2310
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Jen2310
Premium Platinum
- Thread starter
- #23,677
Maybe
But tbf, Port recruited him with a F2 and some other picks.
This was the trade from richmond to port last year
The Tigers have received picks 41 and 49, a future second-round pick tied to Fremantle as well as Port's future fourth-round pick in exchange for Soldo, with the Power also getting Richmond's pick 50 in return.
So freo's F2 this year is pick 27
So Port paid pick 27, 41, 49 and 72
- Jul 19, 2019
- 18,085
- 30,955
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Bro, between F&S"s and their academies, we will never be able to replicate that.
Correct me If I am wrong , but I am pretty sure the president echoed similar sentiments. Would be hard pressed to think they are the only two members of the senior management who share this sentiment.
And, in fairness, he’s seen how badly we’ve used our picks in recent years.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
I would think Mitchell, Crisp, WHE, Elliott and Mihocek should be a chance to play on in 2026 - as rest will be moved on.
Apex36
Hall of Famer
- Mar 26, 2014
- 41,002
- 88,166
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Cal’s guessing, he made that very clear when he prefaced that statement with “my belief is it could be”.
- Jul 19, 2019
- 18,085
- 30,955
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
The question is how well will they play in 2 years time I suppose.
Top-end picks, rookie gems: How Swans and Lions built their GF lists
Cal Twomey compares how Sydney and Brisbane have built the lists that have propelled them to a Grand Final
www.afl.com.au
This article is perfect. Look at Brisbane's draft picks in recent drafts . Aside from two f/s( we of all clubs shouldn't be complaining about f/s) barely any academy picks in their starting lineup.
Agree. He is responsible for coaching the senior team, not the junior development co-ordinator.
Poor managers spend future capital (run down capital) to make themselves look good. Whether it be leasing flash cars, using future picks or back ending contracts.
sr36
TheBrownDog
As Chris Scott said in his surly way when being questioned by a journo about a future list management decision. "I don't know yet, I'm just one vote."
Interesting comments by Fly on SEN saying "I don't want picks, l want players"...Even if we get a pick 12, would we trade it out?
- Sep 25, 2006
- 18,364
- 14,631
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- FC Barcelona, Liverpool, FC Bayern
I’m ok with the coach wanting players over picks.
However, picks will become players once selected.
So he needs to trust the balance of the list bosses and scouts who are entrusted with this work
We need to get the balance right
However, picks will become players once selected.
So he needs to trust the balance of the list bosses and scouts who are entrusted with this work
We need to get the balance right
Jen2310
Premium Platinum
- Thread starter
- #23,694
Given coaches jobs are reliant upon wins and losses and getting better now. Most coaches would be focused on that rather than future players given there is no guarantee the said coach would even be at the club to coach these players.
This is probably why most coaches tend to say out of list management, drafting and the like and leave that to that specific department whose job it is to look after the long term prospects of the club. The coach is focused on winning week by week.
You would rarely see Bucks at the draft.
This is probably why most coaches tend to say out of list management, drafting and the like and leave that to that specific department whose job it is to look after the long term prospects of the club. The coach is focused on winning week by week.
You would rarely see Bucks at the draft.
That’s what I got from Fly’s comment too. I reckon if you polled the current head coaches all of them (or at least a distinct majority) would have the same belief. Because their goals are more short term.
But a list manager needs to balance short term goals with long term goals which is why you need the list manager to be different to the coach.
As one of the posters just alluded to it before, should that situation arise I wouldn't be surprised if the drafting department overrules the wishes of the senior coach.
Forget worrying about what Port might be able to get for Soldo or what machinations they could possibly use to land pick 24.
We wouldn't be getting that for Richards anyway.
More likely the Saints offer up pick 43 and potentially a swap of future selections.
We'll push for Ports current pick 36 or a future 2nd.
Given he's out of contract we might yet have to settle for less than people desire.
We wouldn't be getting that for Richards anyway.
More likely the Saints offer up pick 43 and potentially a swap of future selections.
We'll push for Ports current pick 36 or a future 2nd.
Given he's out of contract we might yet have to settle for less than people desire.
- Aug 16, 2009
- 4,402
- 8,141
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Celtics, Canucks
We did also trade into an extremely shallow draft and out of and extremely deep draft
- Jul 19, 2019
- 18,085
- 30,955
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
I believe we could draft better, don't get me wrong. Could be a reason Hine is being demoted but I really have no ideaTop-end picks, rookie gems: How Swans and Lions built their GF lists
Cal Twomey compares how Sydney and Brisbane have built the lists that have propelled them to a Grand Final
This article is perfect. Look at Brisbane's draft picks in recent drafts . Aside from two f/s( we of all clubs shouldn't be complaining about f/s) barely any academy picks in their starting lineup.
