- Jul 19, 2019
- 18,133
- 31,038
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Apparently he was runner up in the Norm Smith. I really am one eyedWe gave him nothing to kick to so your oversight is understandable
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Apparently he was runner up in the Norm Smith. I really am one eyedWe gave him nothing to kick to so your oversight is understandable
Didn’t realise that. Your one eye must work better than mine.Apparently he was runner up in the Norm Smith. I really am one eyed
His game on replay looks far less significant than how it felt during the GF, we contained him well. Most of his kicks weren’t that impactful in hindsightApparently he was runner up in the Norm Smith. I really am one eyed
Apparently he was runner up in the Norm Smith. I really am one eyed
He did but they didn’t end up leading to much for the lions , he only had 2 more score involvements than Murphy who barely played. Same amount as Quaynor despite having 15 more touches etcHe dominated the first half, was like a designated kicker and the ball just came to him. He had over 20 possessions in the first half IIRC. He was almost completely unsighted after half-time.
I don't know why but I thought he did his knee before the end of the year. It's my fault for not checking it first but now I do remember that first half, he was ripping us apart and just kept getting the ball. My badHe dominated the first half, was like a designated kicker and the ball just came to him. He had over 20 possessions in the first half IIRC. He was almost completely unsighted after half-time.
I now remember him just constantly being in the way in the first halfHe did but they didn’t end up leading to much for the lions , he only had 2 more score involvements than Murphy who barely played. Same amount as Quaynor despite having 15 more touches etc
It is for GCWe’ll need to. Future picks aren’t worth as much as current picks
Spot onSo Brisbane have an academy kid expected to go top 20 and yet he played for the Sandringham Dragons.
How does that work?
So they get priority access and also have the benefit of a "Queensland" kid playing elite u18 football in Victoria.
Nice work if you can get it.
The indicator may have been - it’s got SFA to do with 2024 draft and FA.Given I don't live on here 24/7, and had to catch up 15 pages or so. I was unaware of Kym Jong un's declaration of what can and can't be posted or responded to in here... my bad.
Yeah I think Kennedy would slot into our midfield very nicely.Speaking to a few very well connected Blues fans today, Kennedy seems to be pretty intent on staying in VIC and spoken with most VIC clubs already (apparently with Melbourne the most at this stage).
While I think I'd prefer Peatling at this stage, younger and not even played 50 games yet so I think he does have more potential growth in him, Kennedy can't be disputed for what he would bring to our midfield. He's got good size, is a strong clearance/tackle player and does have solid turn of speed compared to other more "lumbering" type mids. He'd be a great compliment in the mix with Nick, JDG, Crispy and Titch.
A combo of Perryman (FA) and Kennedy would probably cost us maybe a third rounder to bring in the club, and both walk in to our 23 or at worst significantly improve our depth. In a fairly "unappealing" player market atm (Houston aside), those 2 players for say pick 48 all up is pretty astute business. Take our picks to the draft (unless something late crops up) and keep our powder dry for the big fish next year, with a first we can use once we know what that pick will be and the status on young Tommy (where he'll finish in the draft rankings etc).
Yes but they'll have 15 or so clubs interested in their picks. They'll be offered a lot for them.It is for GC
All his stats are above average too, which kind of surprised me.Speaking to a few very well connected Blues fans today, Kennedy seems to be pretty intent on staying in VIC and spoken with most VIC clubs already (apparently with Melbourne the most at this stage).
While I think I'd prefer Peatling at this stage, younger and not even played 50 games yet so I think he does have more potential growth in him, Kennedy can't be disputed for what he would bring to our midfield. He's got good size, is a strong clearance/tackle player and does have solid turn of speed compared to other more "lumbering" type mids. He'd be a great compliment in the mix with Nick, JDG, Crispy and Titch.
A combo of Perryman (FA) and Kennedy would probably cost us maybe a third rounder to bring in the club, and both walk in to our 23 or at worst significantly improve our depth. In a fairly "unappealing" player market atm (Houston aside), those 2 players for say pick 48 all up is pretty astute business. Take our picks to the draft (unless something late crops up) and keep our powder dry for the big fish next year, with a first we can use once we know what that pick will be and the status on young Tommy (where he'll finish in the draft rankings etc).
22 disposals in the first half and only 4 in the second.He dominated the first half, was like a designated kicker and the ball just came to him. He had over 20 possessions in the first half IIRC. He was almost completely unsighted after half-time.
That's not a very nice way to address the mods.
The indicator may have been - it’s got SFA to do with 2024 draft and FA.