I can't believe we aren't trying to get a 2nd round for Witts. Hawks have ruined this trade period by flogging off Mitchell and Lewis for peanuts.Mate just heard Lyons and 53 for 44.
Then 53 for Witts.
Hahaha Witts you absolute Plodder.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I can't believe we aren't trying to get a 2nd round for Witts. Hawks have ruined this trade period by flogging off Mitchell and Lewis for peanuts.Mate just heard Lyons and 53 for 44.
Then 53 for Witts.
Hahaha Witts you absolute Plodder.
If you barrack for Collingwood why would you not want a higher pick for Witts?Mate just heard Lyons and 53 for 44.
Then 53 for Witts.
Hahaha Witts you absolute Plodder.
You might be on the money. Still means we are getting sweet FA for Witts/his value.I would've thought it would be:
Adelaide out: Lyons
Adelaide in: Hawthorn player of equivalent value/ability
Gold Coast out: O'Meara
Gold Coast in: Pick 10, Lyons, 48
Hawthorn out: 10, 48, player to Adelaide.
Hawthorn in: O'Meara
It was rumoured that Gold Coast wanted a player from Hawthorn but no one wanted to go there. Surely there'd be a greater chance of someone wanting to go from Hawthorn to a Adelaide given that the Crows are a red-hot chance for top 4 next year.
Legends member. Don't rate Witts and hate him. I'd happily see him delisted. We should take what we get offered cause he's hopeless IMO.If you barrack for Collingwood why would you not want a higher pick for Witts?
The better the pick the better our choice in draft time?
That's some in depth stuff there Sunbot ; nothing cryptic about that.
So more hope than anything on getting the GC top 10 pick or inside word?
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Can't wait until this bloody 'Pitch' thing is over on Trade Radio.
It doesn't matter what you want mate. Id love a pick in the 20's, but im realistic and i can see his value as no more then a mid 30's pickIf you barrack for Collingwood why would you not want a higher pick for Witts?
The better the pick the better our choice in draft time?
That's fair enough.Legends member. Don't rate Witts and hate him. I'd happily see him delisted. We should take what we get offered cause he's hopeless IMO.
GWS has done a brilliant job of introducing experience into their list - Davis, Mumford, Shaw, Ward, Griffin, Stevie J & Patfull have all added great value and leadership. NOw add Deledio to that. Compare that to GC, who put too many eggs in the Ablett basket and are now miles behind GWS, despite having the same concessions and starting a year earlier.How good does this team want to be?
That's because the first attempt to trade missed completely.I like your idea of trading Cloke twice!
The AFL making shit up us they go, oh yeah, that'd never happen!They can't expect clubs to pay the correct amount of the cap without actually telling clubs what that is.... Surely.
No it does not matter I want at all.It doesn't matter what you want mate. Id love a pick in the 20's, but im realistic and i can see his value as no more then a mid 30's pick
Nah.Heard the hold up for the Dunn trade is Demons want us to take Harry too.
Mate just heard Lyons and 53 for 44.
Then 53 for Witts.
Hahaha Witts you absolute Plodder.
I was told by someone a while ago, someone who has dealings at the club with all the senior figures, that Marley was going and it was based on his off field issues.I agree that we has poor this year but has been much better previously. Clearly he was down on on form & confidence and perhaps outside distractions but it wasn't that long ago that he was being spoken of in AA calculations. I don't believe in abandoning someone whose peak level is so high. Perhaps a change of position would freshen him up. I'd give him a go on the wing, with Crisp pushed back onto a HBF. Regardless, he's too good to simply de-list.
Matt Thompson @MattThompson 28s28 seconds ago
Sydney currently lodging paperwork for Toby Nankervis' move to Tigers for pick 46. @AFL
How does Witts rate v Nankervis is the question??
For the 1,000th time.Last day Trade week set up to be Epic
How does Witts rate v Nankervis is the question??
Heard the hold up for the Dunn trade is Demons want us to take Harry too.
Mate just heard Lyons and 53 for 44.
Then 53 for Witts.
Hahaha Witts you absolute Plodder.
That's very sad for him and a bit of a disaster for us. We're getting such poor return on those that we're trading out and then lose a couple of very talented players (Williams and Marsh) for nothing too. I really hope that there's a reconciliation and Marley stays. Marsh too.I was told by someone a while ago, someone who has dealings at the club with all the senior figures, that Marley was going and it was based on his off field issues.