List Mgmt. Contract, Trade and Draft Discussions - 2024 Post Season

Whose future picks would you have preferred?


  • Total voters
    216

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #2


Quick links



Trade period
In:
12, F1, F2, F3, 73, Baker, Owies, Graham*
Out: 3, 63, F4, Barrass, Darling

*Free agent

Done deals

  • Jai Culley, Alex Witherden and Coby Burgiel delisted






  • Zane Trew, Jamaine Jones and Jordyn Baker delisted

 
Last edited by a moderator:
WCE are so into Warner for next year. It's why we will fight tooth and nail to get Hawks first round for next year.

Money not an issue for Graham. I'd say his contract will be heavily front loaded with Darlings and Barrass money coming out of the cap of which WC would have budgeted for. Next year a lot of front ending contracts will occur so WC can pay Harley and Chad.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Honestly does anyone want Baker?

As a cheap acquisition sure, but it's such a funny situation in which we're the ones pursuing him yet it just feels like a problem to be accommodated. In every hypothetical situation, making Baker work is the sticking point. I'd be perfectly enthusiastic about getting 14 and something else for Barrass and going to the draft with 3 and 14, or splitting 3 and taking three early picks. But no, we also also have get all twisted up working out how to give up some of that to get Liam Baker in.
 
While working through performances from this years Futures game, it was pointed out to me that I hadn't done any of the 2023 Futures game featuring the 2024 draft crop.

Finn turned in an excellent performance in this game back in 2023, making draft watchers all the more excited about what we might see from him in 2024. He showed his elite evasive skills, athletic traits and sticky hands, as well as his penetrating disposal by foot.

 
AFL Trade Radio

@traderadio
·
2m

"Some clubs wanting to slide will target St Kilda's picks and some clubs wanting to come up in the order will target St Kilda. I think picks 7 & 8 is a great position in this Draft."
@CalTwomey

Would we be happy to part with 3 for those 2 picks?
 
I have said before that the top 10 picks in the draft should be sacred every year. The AFL like you said have made a mockery of it. They should have no say in FA compo.
I have a different idea. AFL should determine the compensation but AFL should contribute only 30- 50% of it and the other 50-70% should be paid by the receiving club (with the flag winning club paying 70% decreased to the wooden spooner 50%). In short, FA should not be free but should be subsidised.
 
Honestly does anyone want Baker?

As a cheap acquisition sure, but it's such a funny situation in which we're the ones pursuing him yet it just feels like a problem to be accommodated. In every hypothetical situation, making Baker work is the sticking point. I'd be perfectly enthusiastic about getting 14 and something else for Barrass and going to the draft with 3 and 14, or splitting 3 and taking three early picks. But no, we also also have get all twisted up working out how to give up some of that to get Liam Baker in.

There's no doubt he immediately improves our team, the problem has always been the price at a time when we all want to draft deep.

It's a bit annoying that he said a farewell at his B&F and it's now a formality that he joins us, like now if we don't somehow make it work then we'll look like the bad guys in this situation - and coz we're automatically handicapped in attracting players to WA due to the distance and the fact that we stink right now our recruitment will want to make it work and it feels like they may do it at a detriment to our overall recruitment for the year.

It's far less than an ideal situation IMO. I hope they can work out a way to make it work that doesn't push us backwards in the draft too much.
 
AFL Trade Radio
@traderadio
·
2m

"Some clubs wanting to slide will target St Kilda's picks and some clubs wanting to come up in the order will target St Kilda. I think picks 7 & 8 is a great position in this Draft."
@CalTwomey

Would we be happy to part with 3 for those 2 picks?

If it's just 3 for those 2 absolutely

If it's 3 and 14 I wouldn't be keen
 
AFL Trade Radio
@traderadio
·
2m

"Some clubs wanting to slide will target St Kilda's picks and some clubs wanting to come up in the order will target St Kilda. I think picks 7 & 8 is a great position in this Draft."
@CalTwomey

Would we be happy to part with 3 for those 2 picks?
Cal also loosely tied us to Bo Allen.

With his Essendon hat on, said he would offer pick 9 and future first for pick 3 in hope they get in front of the Kako bid.

I know it was very loose link but imagine how bad it would be walking away from this trade period with
Bo Allen (pick 11)
Baker
Graham
Pick 31……
 
Last edited:
Honestly does anyone want Baker?

As a cheap acquisition sure, but it's such a funny situation in which we're the ones pursuing him yet it just feels like a problem to be accommodated. In every hypothetical situation, making Baker work is the sticking point. I'd be perfectly enthusiastic about getting 14 and something else for Barrass and going to the draft with 3 and 14, or splitting 3 and taking three early picks. But no, we also also have get all twisted up working out how to give up some of that to get Liam Baker in.

Get over it. It's happening.

On Pixel 6 Pro using BigFooty.com mobile app
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

If we slid back from 3 to 6 for Baker it would probably leave us with a choice of Langford, Travaglia or Smillie, assuming Adelaide take Draper.

I'd be happy with either Langford or Travaglia at 6.

I think Langford could be the perfect foil for Harley as an inside midfielder, he projects like a Josh Dunkley type and his kicking is seriously damaging.

Travaglia has all the attributes we're sorely lacking and would be a good choice.

Alternatively

If Adelaide took Langford which they well could, i'd be very happy with Draper as well.
 
RichmondFinn O'Sullivan
North Melbourne??
RichmondSam Lalor
AdelaideSid Draper
Melbourne??
West Coast
Sliding to 6 probably looks like this? With the below in the mix. Should be Jagga or Langford available, if not TT. But that's still a pretty significant drop, let alone dropping to 7 or 8


Jagga Smith
Harvey Langford
Josh Smillie
Tobie Travaglia
Xavier Lindsay
Harry Armstrong
Alix Tauru
Bo Allan
 
RichmondFinn O'Sullivan
North Melbourne??
RichmondSam Lalor
AdelaideSid Draper
Melbourne??
West Coast
Sliding to 6 probably looks like this? With the below in the mix. Should be Jagga or Langford available, if not TT. But that's still a pretty significant drop, let alone dropping to 7 or 8


Jagga Smith
Harvey Langford
Josh Smillie
Tobie Travaglia
Xavier Lindsay
Harry Armstrong
Alix Tauru
Bo Allan
If Jagga slides to 7 and we can get him and Tobie at 8 I’ll go do cartwheels down St George’s Terrace.

Doubt the Saints give up those picks and doubt Jagga slides that far but I hope you’re right.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top