List Mgmt. Contract, Trade and Draft Discussions - 2024 Post Season

Whose future picks would you have preferred?


  • Total voters
    216

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #2


Quick links



Trade period
In:
12, F1, F2, F3, 73, Baker, Owies, Graham*
Out: 3, 63, F4, Barrass, Darling

*Free agent

Done deals

  • Jai Culley, Alex Witherden and Coby Burgiel delisted






  • Zane Trew, Jamaine Jones and Jordyn Baker delisted

 
Last edited by a moderator:
In the realm of memes where laughter flows,
Bzparkes finds joy in the GIF that glows.
With a punch that’s playful, a cheeky display,
It sparks a delight in a most unexpected way.

The fist flies out, a bold, animated spree,
Transforming the mundane into sheer jubilee.
A chuckle erupts, but beneath the façade,
A tingle awakens, making him ROCK HARD!!!

For in the light-hearted, a hint of allure,
An unexpected twist that feels so pure.
Bzparkes laughs loud, but there’s more to the fun,
A rush of blood that ignites, a helmet as big as the sun!

So here’s to the moments, the GIFs he adores,
Where humour and passion can make BZ engorged!
In the playful chaos, a spark can ignite,
With a punch and a grin, his erection takes flight.
 
This is Freo being their usual flog selves, they know full well Baker is coming to us. They're just pushing up his value in Tigers eyes.

Hawthorn, a future first and second with something going back is taking the absolute p1ss. The price went up Kents, trade your F1s and find us pick 6.
We should offer our pick 3 for Bolton just to **** with them
 

Log in to remove this ad.

From the opposite view there's plenty from our side who would prefer to keep 12 and 14 in a really strong draft and get 2 very good (hopefully) players. Always interesting the different views.

Will be an interesting couple of days.
How about this view:

12 and 14 means we effectively downgrade 3 to 12 for Liam ******* Baker.

There is no different perspective on this turd of a deal. It's being fueled by VFL media as they can't accept that Baker won't go for overs and hard to believe eagles actually being dumb enough to do such, despite the fear on here.

Carlel can day dream about pick 3 all they want.
 
Itd be more logical for us to trade a future 1st to get Essendons pick 9 then it is to split pick 3....

26 + 63 + f1st for pick 9 + f2nd would work

After this I feel we could easily turn pick 9 into pick 15 and 16 from GWS if we want also
 
I’m all for trading our future first to get into the top 10 of this year. HOWEVER, the reality is, Essendon/St Kilda would ask for more (mostly like F2). Rightly so as well, it needs to be significant overs just as we would expect for Pick 3.
 
Baker is a very good player, perfect for our midfield and a great foil for Reid but the only reason you would give up big draft currency for him is if we genuinely think we have a contending squad in the next three years (which we don't).

Otherwise the goal is pretty straight forward. Every year we are bottom four we have to give ourselves the best chance of finding future top ten players in the entire AFL. It's hard enough to do that without squandering first rounders on a 27 year old.

Same goes for pick three. I reckon Ginbey and Hewett have long careers ahead and I won't speculate on what they could be, however Sheezel is a lock down multiple AA star and Harley Reid likewise. All of our top 5 draft picks in our history have been guns. Far too valuable to split.
Chris Masten at 2007 pick 3 was solid but no gun.
 
I’m all for trading our future first to get into the top 10 of this year. HOWEVER, the reality is, Essendon/St Kilda would ask for more (mostly like F2). Rightly so as well, we would expect the same if the shoe was on the other foot.
thor-really.gif
 
I’m all for trading our future first to get into the top 10 of this year. HOWEVER, the reality is, Essendon/St Kilda would ask for more (mostly like F2). Rightly so as well, it needs to be significant overs just as we would expect for Pick 3.

No way, those clubs would jump at it’s basically a guaranteed top 3 pick next year.
 
Itd be more logical for us to trade a future 1st to get Essendons pick 9 then it is to split pick 3....

26 + 63 + f1st for pick 9 + f2nd would work

After this I feel we could easily turn pick 9 into pick 15 and 16 from GWS if we want also
Would it not be more logical to first offer our F1 to GWS for 15 and 16 then?

I’d trade it to GCS or Saints for 6/7, but that’s it.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I’m all for trading our future first to get into the top 10 of this year. HOWEVER, the reality is, Essendon/St Kilda would ask for more (mostly like F2). Rightly so as well, it needs to be significant overs just as we would expect for Pick 3.
Our own f1(likely top 4 pick) would get 8 or 9 plus extras from the Saints or bombers

Id offer our f1+f2 for 9+bombersf1
Bombers need to get rid of pick 9 anyway
 
Yep - so it's their job to convince Baker to pursue Plan B, which shouldn't be very hard if Baker really wants his team to be well compensated..

It's kinda obvious that he and Graham want to do this whole Perth move together though - including playing for the same club.
 
Yep - so it's their job to convince Baker to pursue Plan B, which shouldn't be very hard if Baker really wants his team to be well compensated..
I feel like the whole 'very well compensated' thing is vic media make believe.

Baker wants a fair value trade to be sorted out between the two clubs. No more no less.
 
It's kinda obvious that he and Graham want to do this whole Perth move together though - including playing for the same club.

Reckon by around 5 or 6 Baker is gonna be a favourite of this Board. Think he’s being criminally underrated by most.
I think he’s only worth a 2R but even if we end up overpaying reckon he’s gonna add a lot to the team next year. IMO he is exactly what the team needs to set standards and show some grit as we start the upswing. I’m looking forward to getting him onboard. Fork knows how it ends up happening though.


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
Anyone got a best guess on where Curtin would be ranked in the draft if he was available this year?
Surely top 10 right??
 
Is it just me, or does it look like this guys come off a 3 day bender.

Argh yes ...... and then there is that .

Well spotted.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top