-
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Health Coronavirus 2020 / Worldwide (Stats live update in OP) Part 2
- Thread starter Gralin
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
LOL. This is some funky reasoning here!
Every court, except, well the NSW Supreme Court of course. lol.
Hey, it's good enough for Labor and Penny Wong and far-lefties during climate change debates.
Why not now?
Science got ya tongue?
Slowly but stupidly.
School openings were very LOW risk.
Mass protests were very HIGH risk.
Oh Jesus. How can people not understand this.
Simply having a protest does not mean coronavirus simply magically combusts into existence afterwards.
- Apr 23, 2016
- 34,163
- 49,165
- AFL Club
- Essendon
Which was then overturned on appeal, so.... legal protest, forcibly shut down by police?
lol far lefties
NSW Appeal Court does not rule on Victorian laws.
Also, question for another time perhaps, but please think deeply about why a mass protest during a pandemic is ruled legal, and what that tells you.
Yes. Generally those of the centre talk sensibly about measures to reduce carbon emissions.
Far-lefties, on the other hand, simply shriek that they believe in the science!! and that climate change is real!! and with no further substance.
- Apr 23, 2016
- 34,163
- 49,165
- AFL Club
- Essendon
It's not a state law though:
Right to freedom of assembly and association
The following guidance is designed to assist Commonwealth public officials involved in developing legislation, policy or programs. They have not been prepared for the purposes of informing administrative decision-making.
It's not a state law though:
Right to freedom of assembly and association
The following guidance is designed to assist Commonwealth public officials involved in developing legislation, policy or programs. They have not been prepared for the purposes of informing administrative decision-making.www.ag.gov.au
Has no bearing on Victoria.
Gralin
Super Moderator
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #7,586
What is this SCIENCE you speak of
AH yes I see the issue now, it was Andrews fault that protests are legal in Australia and that people decided to hold protests in every state and territory because he opened Schools to slowly
Could you explain the SCIENCE behind magically combusting viruses?
No it doesn't. Victorian Laws also stated that protests were legal. Same as SA, WA, TAS, NT, ACT and QLD who also didn't try and get the protests declared illegal.
Considering protesting is a human right, it's a pretty hard thing to get legally shut down, and that wouldn't have stopped the protests anyway, they still would have happened, just more violently most likely.
Amazing how all of that is Dan's fault though and somehow related to both SCIENCE and magic and being SLOW
But the even bigger dumbarse's than Andrews are the people flooding the stores panic buying, did they not realise last time they could still pop down to the shops to get grocery's.
- Apr 23, 2016
- 34,163
- 49,165
- AFL Club
- Essendon
So a Federal law has no bearing on Victoria now? Are we a separate country? What makes you think the protests would be successfully deemed illegal here when they weren't done so in NSW, and no other State Government even attempted to challenge it?
Yeah i addressed that above but people who are already high on fear in general react and by hearing " i'll lock you all up again " they shit themselves.
He didn't need to say that though, that was just stupid. He really does need to stop with the threats and just address the situation at hand.
Just as likely the Vic Supreme Court would have found as the NSW Supreme Court did.
You can't just extrapolate one decision and say ergo it applies to all. lol.
But anyways, now I get ya. You're not about the science during a pandemic. You're about the NSW Court of Appeal. lol.
Isnt it more simply put that all the press about the BLM protests up to the time they occurred just resulted in people saying '**** this, if they are allowed to protest, i will go do what i want' and hence people did, and because there was already community spread in Vic (well, Melbourne), it just spread more from people gathering all over the place?
and the same exact thing happened in other states with their protests, but the difference is there was no widespread community spread in other cities at that point, and hence there is no escalation of cases now?
and the same exact thing happened in other states with their protests, but the difference is there was no widespread community spread in other cities at that point, and hence there is no escalation of cases now?
Trump said when he had 16 cases that it would all go away by itself and we saw how that turned out
- Apr 23, 2016
- 34,163
- 49,165
- AFL Club
- Essendon
There's certainly more evidence to support the likelihood that protests in VIC would be deemed legal, as were those in NSW, and the lack of any other State Government's challenging them suggests they all thought the likelihood of that avenue succeeding would be low.
But of course, you just want OUTRAGE, not an actual discussion.
No, I want SCIENCE.
You are actually so stupid it's impressive. I'm almost certain you're a troll, as someone cannot backflip so many times, so ardently and without any skerrick of self-awareness like this.
- Apr 23, 2016
- 34,163
- 49,165
- AFL Club
- Essendon
Well the LAW says the protests were legal, thus issuing fines wasn't permitted according to the NSW court ruling. So you want police to be used to forcibly stop a legal protest? Seems we're back to authoritarian police state and OUTRAGE
- Apr 23, 2016
- 34,163
- 49,165
- AFL Club
- Essendon
He's just an avid conspiracy theorist, it explains a lot.
Morganashlee
Flogstradamus of the Year
- Jun 30, 2013
- 26,060
- 55,255
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Cubs Saints Celtics Chelsea Victory
Unfortunately it wasn’t.
Les Malone
Norm Smith Medallist
- Jul 28, 2019
- 5,752
- 6,280
- AFL Club
- GWS
great news .....besides corona virus mortality rates being downgraded all the time to around flu levels, now it appears that having had a common cold can give you immunity - who would have thought .... besides of course many immunologists who were denied a platform and even kicked off places like twitter and facebook and the lack of MSM reporting.
surely this will make everyone happy .....
www.sciencemag.org
Now, two studies reveal infected people harbor T cells that target the virus—and may help them recover. Both studies also found some people never infected with SARS-CoV-2 have these cellular defenses, most likely because they were previously infected with other coronaviruses.
The researchers think these cells were likely triggered by past infection with one of the four human coronaviruses that cause colds; proteins in these viruses resemble those of SARS-CoV-2.
The results suggest “one reason that a large chunk of the population may be able to deal with the virus is that we may have some small residual immunity from our exposure to common cold viruses,” says viral immunologist Steven Varga of the University of Iowa.
surely this will make everyone happy .....
T cells found in COVID-19 patients ‘bode well' for long-term immunity
New findings suggest past infections may offer some protection against the novel coronavirus
Now, two studies reveal infected people harbor T cells that target the virus—and may help them recover. Both studies also found some people never infected with SARS-CoV-2 have these cellular defenses, most likely because they were previously infected with other coronaviruses.
The researchers think these cells were likely triggered by past infection with one of the four human coronaviruses that cause colds; proteins in these viruses resemble those of SARS-CoV-2.
The results suggest “one reason that a large chunk of the population may be able to deal with the virus is that we may have some small residual immunity from our exposure to common cold viruses,” says viral immunologist Steven Varga of the University of Iowa.
- Sep 15, 2011
- 33,427
- 52,344
- AFL Club
- West Coast
I'm not on Twitter, so don't care what others write.
But coronavirus doesn't also magically sweep through one state rally, while respecting the borders of nearby states. Did it have the potential to cause a problem? Sure, though the fact it was outdoors, most wore masks and most tried to distance meant the risk was reduced. Did it cause a problem? No, despite your attempts to paint it as having done so.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
