Malibu#27
Premium Platinum
Latest news:
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Hope so.You would think if North have presented a bigger contract offer to Dan they have come to an agreement with Port for a trade and Port has said it's now up to them to convince Dan.
You would think if North have presented a bigger contract offer to Dan they have come to an agreement with Port for a trade and Port has said it's now up to them to convince Dan.
That doesn't justify it, Eddie Betts was still well and truly more than twice the player Owies is.That was 10 years ago when the cap was 10mil. It's 18mil now.
Ah sorry thought you meant GC and Collingwood.I’m talking about Carlton and Collingwood.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Are you surprised opposition clubs undervalue our players? The way we speak about them and our list pretty much speaks for itself.
Take their future 1st, then trade our own future first and future 2nd for Luko and 13. That's what I'd target. Kangas' future first is likely to be top 5 pick and that puts us in the equation for Dyson Sharp, especially with 2 year future trading starting next year.Unsure what we want from north.
I don’t see their future first as being anywhere near enough, too much risk it ends up being pick 8 alone. Why do that for Dan ?
Don’t want pick 2 alone either, don’t rate the top end of this draft that much that I would take just one pick.
Would tell north to get us 2 1sts with at least one being top 12. Happy for either both in this draft or one in the future is fine as long as we have one in this draft.
Not comparable. Hinkley's comments this year "maybe we're not good enough" and Davies denigration of the list shortly thereafter to try and justify their continued positions as the most unsuccessful coach in VFL/AFL history and General Manager of Football is nothing compared to supporters critiquing or taking out frustrations on a footy forum.But then that's pretty much every BF supporter group.
Take their future 1st, then trade our own future first and future 2nd for Luko and 13. That's what I'd target. Kangas' future first is likely to be top 5 pick and that puts us in the equation for Dyson Sharp, especially with 2 year future trading starting next year.
So adding that to philthy05 suggestion, the net result is:Take their future 1st, then trade our own future first and future 2nd for Luko and 13. That's what I'd target. Kangas' future first is likely to be top 5 pick and that puts us in the equation for Dyson Sharp, especially with 2 year future trading starting next year.
I think he meant NM give us a 2024 1R (after splitting pick 2) and 2025 1R, which seems fair for us if the 2024 1R falls between 8 and 12.As I said earlier, their f1 could be as high as 8, that’s a horrible trade for us.
They’re also getting Better offers for 13
It sort of does…Betts was worth 7% of the total cap space, Owies 3.8%.That doesn't justify it, Eddie Betts was still well and truly more than twice the player Owies is.
Unsure what we want from north.
I don’t see their future first as being anywhere near enough, too much risk it ends up being pick 8 alone. Why do that for Dan ?
Don’t want pick 2 alone either, don’t rate the top end of this draft that much that I would take just one pick.
Would tell north to get us 2 1sts with at least one being top 12. Happy for either both in this draft or one in the future is fine as long as we have one in this draft.
We need to get into the first round of this draft and at the very least pay off Lukosius.The other option seem to be:
Carlton: Future 2nd + Owies
Collingwood: 13 + 23 + Richards
I'd take a North Future 1st alone all day over both of those offers.
I can't see a world where North's future first is outside the top 6 which is far better than 13 + 23 and a steak knife.
There is a good chance it is top 3 again too.
We need to get into the first round of this draft and at the very least pay off Lukosius.
At this juncture, no offer is satisfactory, so Dan is staying put as far as I'm concerned.The other option seem to be:
Carlton: Future 2nd + Owies
Collingwood: 13 + 23 + Richards
I'd take a North Future 1st alone all day over both of those offers.
I can't see a world where North's future first is outside the top 6 which is far better than 13 + 23 and a steak knife.
There is a good chance it is top 3 again too.
Then they can split pick 2.
Are we really that desperate we'd prefer 13 & 23 that likely are pushed out to 14-17 & late 20's in this draft over the potential for a top 3 pick next year and more than likely worst case scenario pick 6/7 next year.
There becomes a point if you're that desperate to get into this draft that it's an insane mistake taking a far worse offer. We might not even get the player we're targeting at 14-17 or late 20's anyway.
Not comparable. Hinkley's comments this year "maybe we're not good enough" and Davies denigration of the list shortly thereafter to try and justify their continued positions as the most unsuccessful coach in VFL/AFL history and General Manager of Football is nothing compared to supporters critiquing or taking out frustrations on a footy forum.
Wrong way around, I reckon we are trading next year's first to the Gold Coast for Luko and their pick 23.If Gc accept 23 for Luko then 13, Luko, Richards isn’t the end of the world, its passable
For veteran teams in finals with good coaching, we are a succulent Chinese meal to them.We finished second at the end of the minor round. Opposing coaches don't rate Ken.
I don't understand why Collingwood are trying to Gold Coast's pick 23 in the Noble trade to give us, and then we're talking about whether Gold Coast would take pick 23 for Luko?If Gc accept 23 for Luko then 13, Luko, Richards isn’t the end of the world, its passable
That doesn't justify it, Eddie Betts was still well and truly more than twice the player Owies is.