Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's paywalled to meThat's a good read (and doesn't appear to be paywalled).
Worsfold believes Cox’s ability to connect with his players will be a feature of his coaching.
He’s authentic, has high values, is a good person and made other people feel important. He wasn’t transitional with his contact with people. He always made them feel like he was enjoying time with them.
Tony Micale (his first coach at East Perth and former WCE asst coach) ;
“He will be an outstanding coach. He is a strong character, he doesn’t suffer fools,”
He has a great imagination, but it is his strength of character as well.
“They are a super, super football club, but he will add another dimension to the mental side of the game. Dare anyone knock John Longmire, but they won’t be beaten by big margins in grand finals. I think he will really tighten that aspect of it."
I reckon it’s not rocket science and if you had asked Horse, he’d have said the same.Cox must of read BF focusing and planning on addressing our weaknesses.
Time will tell if is successful
Would you seriously have played Adams before Warner in GF?I am tempering my expectations on Cox for the time being.
He is saying all of the right things, and he's shown a particular willingness to deviate from Horse in some areas already, which has pleasantly surprised me. (To his credit, he's done so in a way that makes clear that difference without disrespecting or casting blame on Horse in any way. A difficult balancing act to manage, but I think he's done so nicely.)
But actions speak louder than words. I think Horse, or any half decent coach for that matter, would be able to look at any given team and identify their strengths and weaknesses pretty quickly. Horse was one of the drivers of us going after another contested mid at the end of last season, so the problems weren't lost on him, and they're clearly not lost on Cox, either.
Having the solutions to the problem is where Cox has to, and hopefully can, prove himself.
Horse recognised the need for more contested strength in the midfield, but when the time came to make a decision between, say, the game-breaking Warner and a contested mid in Adams, he went with Warner. When the time came to make a decision between, say, one of his many classy outside runners and a contested mid in Adams, he went with his many classy outside runners.
There's no guarantee that just because Cox recognises the issues we have and the areas we need to improve in, that he won't show that same inability to prioritise it at the expense of a better, "flashier" player. ie. Making a really tough call to get the outcome he wants.
I will say that Cox acknowledging forward pressure and a stronger front half game as things he wants us to be better at, and then being part of the drafting of Dattoli with our very first pick, is a promising early example of action, not just words.
No, I was talking about in the midfield.Would you seriously have played Adams before Warner in GF?
He'd have to be. The rucks who coached AFL sides were:For the pointless stats file: is he the tallest coach ever?
And contested possessionFirst thing Cox needs to do is to put more emphasis on our clearances.
Yeah, I remember Horse getting slammed on here for commenting on our some of the losses saying the team's pressure wasn't good enough. How Cox is talking aobut how he sees isn't hugely different from how Horse did to my eye. Time will tell, I guess.I reckon it’s not rocket science and if you had asked Horse, he’d have said the same.
The question will be how they went/go about correcting the deficiencies.Yeah, I remember Horse getting slammed on here for commenting on our some of the losses saying the team's pressure wasn't good enough. How Cox is talking aobut how he sees isn't hugely different from how Horse did to my eye. Time will tell, I guess.
Absolutely. But until that point, the messaging is essentially the same as last year.The question will be how they went/go about correcting the deficiencies.
Animal training is based on positive reinforcement of desirable behaviours. In this case we would be talking about rewarding those bringing the pressure and the flip side would be replacing those who don't.
I won't speak for others, but for me personally I suppose the main difference is the goodwill the two coaches had/have.Absolutely. But until that point, the messaging is essentially the same as last year.
For the pointless stats file: is he the tallest coach ever?
Hopefully this doesn't end up being a meme in the swans season images/gifs thread at some point in 2025.I would have thought one of the perks of being the head coach is that you can delegate the dirty jobs to the minions...
I dunno, if we are playing well the meme could be standing on the shoulders of a of a giantHopefully this doesn't end up being a meme in the swans season images/gifs thread at some point in 2025.
Food flipI dunno, if we are playing well the meme could be standing on the shoulders of a of a giant
1. NoWhat do we reckon the positional shifts may be? (NB: not selection changes, positional changes, which seemed to be what Cox intimated).
1. Logan to defence
2. Blakey to attack
3. Florent to attack
4. Mills to inside mid
5. Sheldrick to inside mid
6. Amartey to ruck as well as forward
7. Fox to defence (horse barely played him there last year)
1. No1. No
2. No
3. No
4. Maybe
5. Hope so
6. In the VFL maybe
7. Maybe
1. McLean dropped, Amartey 2nd ruck dutiesWhat do we reckon the positional shifts may be? (NB: not selection changes, positional changes, which seemed to be what Cox intimated).
1. Logan to defence
2. Blakey to attack
3. Florent to attack
4. Mills to inside mid
5. Sheldrick to inside mid
6. Amartey to ruck as well as forward
7. Fox to defence (horse barely played him there last year)