Wtf is he doing in his off time? Don't pros have clauses in their contract not letting them do high risk things ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wtf is he doing in his off time? Don't pros have clauses in their contract not letting them do high risk things ?
GC will be stuffed by thenThey should be Carlton and St Kilda, but I'm tipping Essendon this week and GC at the Gabba will be no certainty.
Melbourne only have a 5 day break (and they played at night, Bombers during the day).Wanted to tip bombers but 4 day break is killer
It sure is a balancing act for us.With Ports 2 injuries, they could finish lower than Melbourne now
I was referring to the fact that it was mentioned that we could get a top 5 pick from the Saints for Sloane. I just don't think that they will give that up for him. We only got pick 9 for Danger who was younger and a top 3 player in the league.New supporter? Did you know that Patrick Dangerfield of the Geelong Cats was once a Crow's player. He left as a RFA and we got a first and second round pick for him.
Yes, but, Geelong gave us the highest pic that they had. That’s what the Saints will have to do too.I was referring to the fact that it was mentioned that we could get a top 5 pick from the Saints for Sloane. I just don't think that they will give that up for him. We only got pick 9 for Danger who was younger and a top 3 player in the league.
Unless they do a deal somewhere else they wont. They have 2 picks under 70. 1 is 4 and the other 66 ( as it stands)Yes, but, Geelong gave us the highest pic that they had. That’s what the Saints will have to do too.
Unless they do a deal somewhere else they wont. They have 2 picks under 70. 1 is 4 and the other 66 ( as it stands)
I was going to add those but I still think the Saints club and Board might still shy away from the lashbackFair point, but why not do that deal with us. We have 3 picks under 19 plus our 2019 first.
Hmm.. Makes sense... Good theory .. Then bam .... Goodwin signs as coach...Spent a bit of time of the MFC board earlier. They HATE Goody over there, almost as much as we all hate the Levers.
Waiting for the tinfoil hat theories about Goody tanking the season for them so the Crows can get a higher draft pick.... You know they’re thinking it
Goodwin strikes me as a good assistant. I reckon he's also a pretty good leader of men, but I'm not convinced he's a great head coach.
I reckon the complexity combined with the pressure at the highest level of coaching may not suit him.
His leadership qualities has meant thar people will listen to him, however this will fade if he's not getting the results.
I do have a massive soft spot for him being a legend of our club, so I don't want to see him fail. But on the other hand, Melbourne....
Like patting a dog?Wtf is he doing in his off time? Don't pros have clauses in their contract not letting them do high risk things ?
I was referring to the fact that it was mentioned that we could get a top 5 pick from the Saints for Sloane. I just don't think that they will give that up for him. We only got pick 9 for Danger who was younger and a top 3 player in the league.
Did he have it cleared by the AFLPA?Like patting a dog?
But he sure knows how to get a deal doneSure, but we got reamed in that trade. Noble is the worst negotiator this league has seen.
But he sure knows how to get a deal done
I'm sure all those other list managers really enjoyed working with himWas highly regarded in the industry for his ability to get trades done.
I'm sure all those other list managers really enjoyed working with him
He got us pick 12 for Cameron. That was pretty good.Sure, but we got reamed in that trade. Noble is the worst negotiator this league has seen.
I was going to add those but I still think the Saints club and Board might still shy away from the lashback
Though they could sell it as Sloane and Carltons 2nd ie pick 19 or even our pick 18
I'd agree with everything above except for the word "good". I have another word in mindThey actually said exactly that at times. Think it was Stephen Wells after the Danger trade saying it was great working with Noble because he didn't anchor which can make it hard to get a deal done. Many of the usual suspects around here used that as evidence that Noble was a good negotiator.
If he goes you know he'll be back at the Crows in something else capacity next year. Or he'll at least fill a spot in the media until a spot opens up.Goodwin strikes me as a good assistant. I reckon he's also a pretty good leader of men, but I'm not convinced he's a great head coach.
I reckon the complexity combined with the pressure at the highest level of coaching may not suit him.
His leadership qualities has meant thar people will listen to him, however this will fade if he's not getting the results.
I do have a massive soft spot for him being a legend of our club, so I don't want to see him fail. But on the other hand, Melbourne....