Mega Thread Delist/Trade/Draft Supermegaultrathread - Who will we draft? edition

Pick 11 - Who will it be


  • Total voters
    263

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Looks like even delisted players are going to reject playing for the Eagles......
Better chance of game time at st kilda
Better chance of finals (just) at Richmond
Already lives in Melbourne

Assuming a comparable contract offer why would he move to Perth
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Hmm, not sure about that.
In the short term. Just like Sheed won't make that much difference to our side next year. Outside players can make a difference from day one, particularly in a side that lacks agility and in the forward half and pace in the middle
 
But surely the reward would be that he ends up like a Ziebell or Mundy, which wouldn't add to our side as much in the near future as a fast outside mid would.
The problem is he gets really low numbers playing in the middle even at high school level.

Sure, he has an ok contested game, but when you can't accumulate against high schoolers or in TAC as an onballer, but are big bodied and contested, its not great
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Really, from all reports he's been mid-20's+ in his average possessions... pretty sure he had a 24 possession game in NEAFL this season too.
Less. Just 20 I think and it's a lower level of competition.

Aish was getting big numbers playing senior footy. He has a more balanced game than Aish though and is a nice long kick
 
Looks like even delisted players are going to reject playing for the Eagles......

I'm not complaining.

The prospect of De Goey @ # 11. Doesn't inspire me at all.

He would be a very safe pick granted but I can't help thinking that we would be selling our selves short by spending # 11 on him.

Is he a genuine midfielder - NO
Does he have genuine speed - NO
Is he a high possession getter - NO
Does he have elite foot skills - NO .....but he is OK
Does he provide versatility - YES
Is he a bigger bodied midfield option - YES
Would he be best available @ # 11- NO
Does he have footy smarts - YES

Simpson says he rates:
1. Hunger for the contest .
2. Versatility .
3. High footy IQ .

De Goey does tick all three prerequisites.

Safe enough selection however not sure that he addresses any area of real need .

I will remain a cynic of this selection, if it comes to be ,
untill his performances warrant the high pick .
I would be thrilled to be proven wrong on this one as I just want the best for our Club. But I would feel very underwhelmed if we took him at # 11.

Sort of like you get the budget to go out a buy a BMW but you come back with a Golf .

His new video on AFL.com is much more impressive, looks a lot more like a slightly slower and taller version of Daniel Hannebery. Never the less his production is concerning and his kicking over rated.
 
His new video on AFL.com is much more impressive, looks a lot more like a slightly slower and taller version of Daniel Hannebery. Never the less his production is concerning and his kicking over rated.

I'm leery of these AFL.com videos, some of these inside mids don't seem to do much on the inside... prefer some of the stuff on youtube. Still, best stuff for analysis is cuts of full games where you get to see every touch, both effectual and ineffectual. In that respect the AFL draft scene has a lot missing when compared to US pro sports.
 
I am a bit surprised at the lack of love for Jarrod Garlett on this thread. Having watched the WA v Vic Country game, I rated his game better than Jarrod Pickett's. He is highly skilled, is really fast, agile has an excellent work effort, good disposal, reads the play well and does all the one percenters.

If we take Pickett or the ****-Or-Two with our first I'm pretty sure Garlett would be gone by the time we get to our pick 32. Interested in want those who watch Garlett more closely think of him.

It wouldn't worry me if he was our first pick.

There is a lot to love about Garlett. I've rated him higher than Clem Smith since last year and thought he might wind up being one of the bolters of this draft. But his game is nowhere near Pickett's.

The problem with Garlett isn't what he does with ball in hand, because his ability with ball will see him go top 30. The problem is how he wins the ball. He's a handball receive king and he gets it wider than Pickett does. He isn't as strong in traffic or in close as Pickett and isn't going to turn that loose ball get into a uncontested shot on goal as regularly. Garlett is a jet but he's very outside and the type of player who takes ball already won.

Physically he's probably as, if not more athletic than Pickett. He doesn't have the pure acceleration of Pickett that sets Pickett apart in congestion, but his smaller frame and longer stride length makes him as fast over the stretch and a genuine line breaker on the outside. It also gives him a more efficient running style and he has better endurance as a result.

Bummer we don't have a second pick in the 20's. No guarantees at all that Pickett will be there at 11 or Garlett at 32.
 
I'm leery of these AFL.com videos, some of these inside mids don't seem to do much on the inside... prefer some of the stuff on youtube. Still, best stuff for analysis is cuts of full games where you get to see every touch, both effectual and ineffectual. In that respect the AFL draft scene has a lot missing when compared to US pro sports.

Yeah they are true "highlights" packages.

Other footage shows De Goey kicking long and failing to select short targets, which is just dumb football. AFL video's shows him hitting more long kicks, either way the long kicking buffs his efficiency stats.
 
Anyone in mind? There don't seem to be too many genuine midfielders as you truly said.


Not at our pick.

Pickett - Elite ball use, explosive speed, agility, small, defensive side needs to improve.
Weller - Great kick (duel sided), fast, small, very outside.
De Goey - Great Mark, good size, average kick (kicks too long*), low disposal count, not a full time mid (yet*).
Laverde - Fast, tall, versatile, average kick, not a full time mid (yet).
Ahern - Fast, Agile, goal kicker, small, full time midfielder at AFL level?

It means we could release Yeo and Shuey to play outside

And see their effect diminished?
 
He did ok, not great. Wasn't super in his handful of TAC games, not at school level.

Don't get me wrong, plays ok, just struggles to win much ball outside of the contest. Inside mid getting 12 touches aint great.

He was playing on a flank and averaged 15 possessions.
 
Not at our pick.

Pickett - Elite ball use, explosive speed, agility, small, defensive side needs to improve.
Weller - Great kick (duel sided), fast, small, very outside.
De Goey - Great Mark, good size, average kick (kicks too long*), low disposal count, not a full time mid (yet*).
Laverde - Fast, tall, versatile, average kick, not a full time mid (yet).
Ahern - Fast, Agile, goal kicker, small, full time midfielder at AFL level?



And see their effect diminished?

Kicks too long?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top