Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
If WC were to agree with your stance of "Couldn’t care less what we have to give Geelong, just get it done" and give up next year's 1st round selection as part of the Kelly trade, the consequence is that finding replacements for Hurn and Jetta gets pushed back, and the subsequent development time to integrate their replacements doesn't coincide correctly. That's the consequence of not valuing picks and advocating to give Geelong whatever they want. You're not taking into consideration list management at all. Your sole focus is on getting Kelly at any expense.
That would be you. In your own words: "Couldn’t care less what we have to give Geelong, just get it done." It's implied that you're willing to.
That's quite an assumption. Your irrational point is: 'agree with me or you don't understand that you cannot be forever up the top.'
WC can trade in Kelly, hopefully win a couple of premierships, all without having to resort to the insanity of "Couldn’t care less what we have to give Geelong, just get it done."
I'm the arbiter of my opinion, not you. Unless you have direct quotes to work off, you're making shit up as you go. I'm pro-tanking during WC's down years. So your call is flat out wrong.
Giving up "a couple of second round draft picks" is a far cry from your earlier stated position of "Couldn’t care less what we have to give Geelong, just get it done."
And I never claimed that is your position. I was specific in what I stated.
I can appreciate that, just not under the proviso of "Couldn’t care less what we have to give Geelong, just get it done."
Can you please not be so rationalIt’s pretty obvious that Geelong have absolutely no intention of trading Kelly with out us offering significant overs.
In many ways I do understand their position, they are rolling the dice for one last hoorah with this current group and they get to keep Kelly who is A grade talent that only costs them 120K plus match payments, so that a bargain basement deal.
We enquirerd , gave it our best shot , put up a fair offer, it’s been rejected.
We move on , we realign and focus on the defence of the Cup.
While disappointing ....... and I do acknowledge that Kelly would have been a fine acquisition to our playing stocks as well as bolstering our midfield,........ It wasn’t to be.
We have made two grand finals in the past four seasons, lost one , won one ....all done with out Kelly playing for us.
He was a want not a need.
Besides we have already regained an A grade midfielder who wasn’t in our last finals series ..... Mr Andrew Gaff.
We move on , we realign and focus on the defence of the Cup.
Besides we have already regained an A grade midfielder who wasn’t in our last finals series ..... Mr Andrew Gaff.
If you use last years trading period as a guide to player value, the Cats have well and truly got their heads stuck right up their ar*es.
Last year
Devon Smith went for pick 11
Jake Lever 10
Impey 34
Gibbs 10 and 26
Stringer 25 and 30
Ablett 19
Saad for a future second rounder
Schache 25 and 40
This year
McGovan 13
Hannaberry 28 and a pick swap
Aaron Hall. 68
Shield looks like will go for 9
Wingard 18 plus a player
Polec & Pittard 11 plus future pick
2016 Trade Period
Brad Hill 23
Tom Mitchell 14 & 52
Caddy 24 & 64
So how the hell is a first year mature age player worth Pick 10 in a very strong draft.
Here is my tip: The Collingwood game against Norf will not be one of the 4 Hobart games.
How the **** did Hawthorn get Scully for a fourth rounder
A future 4th rounder mind you
Oscar Brownless to be bid on by West CoastI reckon you would have Oscar in your list. He’s a pick 50+ player. Happy for you to take him with pick 20
I would argue Monocle that we have offered significant overs based on similar recent trades.It’s pretty obvious that Geelong have absolutely no intention of trading Kelly with out us offering significant overs.
In many ways I do understand their position, they are rolling the dice for one last hoorah with this current group and they get to keep Kelly who is A grade talent that only costs them 120K plus match payments, so that a bargain basement deal.
We enquirerd , gave it our best shot , put up a fair offer, it’s been rejected.
We move on , we realign and focus on the defence of the Cup.
While disappointing ....... and I do acknowledge that Kelly would have been a fine acquisition to our playing stocks as well as bolstering our midfield,........ It wasn’t to be.
We have made two grand finals in the past four seasons, lost one , won one ....all done with out Kelly playing for us.
He was a want not a need.
Besides we have already regained an A grade midfielder who wasn’t in our last finals series ..... Mr Andrew Gaff.
That Helicoptor and man are enormous!