Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
Meh. Easy 4 points i saySo the Saints want to shift their home game from Marvel to the MCG rd3 2023.
They want to make it a blockbuster . Who do you think they want to be the opponent?
Are we able to refuse to be used yet again to enable a club to profit off our members?
After all this is a club that only had to pay out their sacked coach at 50%. We would have to payout 100% if we sacked a coach only months after signing him up.
Let them die, or be relocated.
I've always loved the coaches award.. These blokes tuned in.We already have one award voted by players, one award voted by coaches and numerous awards voted by media personalities. Let the umps keep their award, but perhaps it’s a time for the industry to shift the prestige. Perhaps that shift could be achieved via a new award that considers the votes already cast across the various awards, a best of the best?
I think this article covers it well enough: Alleged bets laid on ‘over 10 games’ arrested AFL ump worked — and two he wasn’t on field forI've always loved the coaches award.. These blokes tuned in.
Brownlow nowadays is WAGS and red carpet. TV..
Somebody help me out..
Votes are supposed to be totally locked away until Brownlow night.
How did Michael Pell help his friends with results?
Perhaps his own votes?
Sucks either way. If he's guilty he needs to do a little time.
Seems your wish came true..I've always loved the coaches award.. These blokes tuned in.
Brownlow nowadays is WAGS and red carpet. TV..
Somebody help me out..
Votes are supposed to be totally locked away until Brownlow night.
How did Michael Pell help his friends with results?
Perhaps his own votes?
Sucks either way. If he's guilty he needs to do a little time.
Seems that the attempt to avoid detection by placing multiple smaller bets was their undoing and more so given they only placed winning bets. Suggests to me that this was a group of mates/individuals rather than a syndicate/larger group.
Greed has no bounds. This is exceptionally bad. Umpire will likely get prison time.Seems that the attempt to avoid detection by placing multiple smaller bets was their undoing and more so given they only placed winning bets. Suggests to me that this was a group of mates/individuals rather than a syndicate/larger group.
TBH, I'm really struggling to give a shit whether a loose tongued umpire enabled some blokes to rip off some betting agencies. It says something that the integrity of betting markets is such a massive AFL issue.Greed has no bounds. This is exceptionally bad. Umpire will likely get prison time.
Funny how the betting agencies were so easily able to identify and deal with punters who were continually winning and yet seem so unable to do anything about those problem gamblers who lose everything to them!!!!!TBH, I'm really struggling to give a s**t whether a loose tongued umpire enabled some blokes to rip off some betting agencies. It says something that the integrity of betting markets is such a massive AFL issue.
An official doing something dodgy goes to the integrity of the game. Same for any sport the world over.TBH, I'm really struggling to give a s**t whether a loose tongued umpire enabled some blokes to rip off some betting agencies. It says something that the integrity of betting markets is such a massive AFL issue.
Fair enough. It's no doubt a scandal, but I still don't care if an umpire told some people who he voted for. It's a pretty meh scandal in my eyes.An official doing something dodgy goes to the integrity of the game. Same for any sport the world over.
That's ok, you don't have to care. It's certainly newsworthy.Fair enough. It's no doubt a scandal, but I still don't care if an umpire told some people who he voted for. It's a pretty meh scandal in my eyes.
I'll leave it to the police to protect the state secrecy of who got 3 Brownlow votes in a game. But I'll continue to consider it a social absurdity that the state spend money on it - to maintain profits from spot betting on who got 3 votes in a game. Unfortunately, that's where we're at.That's ok, you don't have to care. It's certainly newsworthy.
You did call it a massive AFL scandal a moment ago. Anytime the integrity of an official comes into question, it is needs to be immediately treated as a massive threat to the integrity of the game, that's for sure.
TiresomeI'll leave it to the police to protect the state secrecy of who got 3 Brownlow votes in a game. But I'll continue to consider it a social absurdity that the state spend money on it - to maintain profits from spot betting on who got 3 votes in a game. Unfortunately, that's where we're at.