There was an article floating about where they graded the trades and Grundy got a B or something and Mcstay got a C, does anyone know where I can find it for the lulz.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think our commitment would still be to Brodie. Melbourne pay him an agreed amount and we continue to pay the balance of what his contract amount was worth with us.Maybe this question needs its own thread however…..
What happens to collingwoods “ Grundy subsidy” if Melbourne get rid of him? Surely any new club he lands at does not get the benefit of the subsidy….. we have no agreement with anybody but Melbourne. If he’s not on the Dees books any more then surely the deal is cancelled. Why should we pay them a salary subsidy for a player they no longer have on their books?
we are paying $250k I beleive, and will do until end of contractI think our commitment would still be to Brodie. Melbourne pay him an agreed amount and we continue to pay the balance of what his contract amount was worth with us.
Just like Collingwood have an obligation for the difference in Melbourne's contract vaue with Brody and his contract value with Collingwood, if Melbourne were to offload him, then they would be responsible for the difference between their contract and the new contract value with another club. Brody will always be remunerated at the original contract sum with Collingwood for the duration of that contract term.Maybe this question needs its own thread however…..
What happens to collingwoods “ Grundy subsidy” if Melbourne get rid of him? Surely any new club he lands at does not get the benefit of the subsidy….. we have no agreement with anybody but Melbourne. If he’s not on the Dees books any more then surely the deal is cancelled. Why should we pay them a salary subsidy for a player they no longer have on their books?
Just like Collingwood have an obligation for the difference in Melbourne's contract vaue with Brody and his contract value with Collingwood, if Melbourne were to offload him, then they would be responsible for the difference between their contract and the new contract value with another club. Brody will always be remunerated at the original contract sum with Collingwood for the duration of that contract term.
Mathematics sure has changed in the 21st century….Teams outside top four have made the GF 4 times for a 1-2 record.
Mathematics sure has changed in the 21st century….
Surely it depends on how the contract is written.Just like Collingwood have an obligation for the difference in Melbourne's contract vaue with Brody and his contract value with Collingwood, if Melbourne were to offload him, then they would be responsible for the difference between their contract and the new contract value with another club. Brody will always be remunerated at the original contract sum with Collingwood for the duration of that contract term.
And one of those two had to happen against us.Finals history mk2. Since the final eight came in.
Interstate sides have won five premierships when their opponents had home state advantage … Brisbane (3), Sydney and west coast 1. They won a further three when the MCG was neutral… Sydney west coast ( playing each other tri years running) and port when they stopped Brisbane’s four peat.
They have lost eight where their opponents had home state advantage, net score -3.
More recently interstate sides have played in eight of the last ten grand finals and only won two.
And one of those two had to happen against us.
You might want to re-think that. Deduct 4 points from the swans and the Crows are in.A myth that Crows supporters will repeat ad nauseum for the next 100 years…..
That they missed finals in 2023 because of the goal umpire in round 22.
Reality is that they finished 1.5 games out of the eight.
Forgot they played the swans lol. Oh well suck eggs crows!You might want to re-think that. Deduct 4 points from the swans and the Crows are in.
You are also forgetting the swans won a game because of a north interchange infraction.Forgot they played the swans lol. Oh well suck eggs crows!
There are 2300 minutes plus time on in a season of football so to blame their fate on 30 seconds of that and ignoring situations that may have changed outcomes in the other 99.98% of the season is pretty shallow analysis.
Almost as shallow as my original post on this topic hahah
Despite that, they are correct. That gets called a goal and they play finals.Forgot they played the swans lol. Oh well suck eggs crows!
There are 2300 minutes plus time on in a season of football so to blame their fate on 30 seconds of that and ignoring situations that may have changed outcomes in the other 99.98% of the season is pretty shallow analysis.
Almost as shallow as my original post on this topic hahah
Thanks Sandra for the late breaking news that I was wrongDespite that, they are correct. That gets called a goal and they play finals.
As long as they beat Carlton all is forgiven.You are also forgetting the swans won a game because of a north interchange infraction.
Swannies def don’t deserve to be playing finals
Only my lovers call me Sandra.Thanks Sandra for the late breaking news that I was wrong