Strategy Draft assistance 2023 [Twomey: NMFC get #19 in 2023, x2 end of 1st rd picks in 2024, and x2 extra rookie list spots in 2024; no Sanders/#11]

[The Nostradamus]

2 future firsts for Gc pick 4

Or target a gun player (Sean Darcy

4

Sean Darcy

Age

26

Ht

203cm

Wt

111kg

Pos.

Ruck

Career

Season

Last 5

D

10.1

3star

K

3.4

1star

HB

6.6

4star

CL

2.4

4star

HO

28.8

5star

D

6.8

1star

K

2.0

1star

HB

4.8

3star

CL

1.8

4star

HO

20.3

5star

D

11.4

3star

K

4.6

2star

HB

6.8

5star

CL

2.6

5star

HO

32.0

5star

)

 

[r_boy]

Just reject it honestly what's the point, especially if those F1s can't be traded

Gonna unsubscribe Kayo

 

[Lomas]

Plenty to work with here.

I think so too. I wonder if this also flags the afl changing the fathers son and academy bidding to ‘pummel from same round’ next year. These end of first rounds would be handy then….

 

[Footywizard]

Is it 3 end of first round picks or 3 start of second round picks. The only difference is that we can use them on draft night 1 instead of draft night 2.

Hows your brain size mate. It says end of first round

If there are no caveats on the 2 future end of 1st round picks next year then bundle them with our pick#19 from this years assistance package to give to Gold Coast for their 1st round pick..

Would Gold Goast accept this and can they use these additional points this season..

Depends If it's really worth it for us, I'd rather we just use all the picks we have as is. We just need to keep bringing in good players.

 

[blackshadow]

Not what I was hoping for but better than I expected.

Must trade the two next year for GCS pick 4 5. Maybe trade em all for four.

All three PPs for GCS pick .

As it stands would give us 2,3, 4 5, 14 15 which is a pretty decent hand and we hold on to our first round next year.

 

[Kanga Glory]

This is a bit sad,

 

[The Warlord]

Not what I was hoping for but better than I expected.

Must trade the two next year for GCS pick 4 5. Maybe trade em all for four.

All three PPs for GCS pick .

As it stands would give us 2,3, 4 5, 14 15 which is a pretty decent hand and we hold on to our first round next year.

They need this year points.

We need to trade those picks for players.

 

[Groucho]

Actually more than I expected. Good that we can keep two extra rookies. Realistically other clubs weren't going to allow any more than this.

 

[King Hansen]

I love the caveat of the 2 x 2024 picks (to be reviewed)

And by giving us more in 2024, it means that we effectively can't apply for anything next year.

Just trade them this year and ask for more next year lol

 

[Rooboy1708]

Yes I think you might be right.

The good news is that the statement said can be reviewed not will be so if they are not there then cant be

 

[Disco Dew]

There are no caveats around any of the picks. The future firsts can absolutely be traded, which means they won’t be reviewed. Although that would be piss funny. Trade them out this year, rise up the ladder next year and the picks get taken off whoever has them.

Alternatively, keep the picks be shit or shitter next year and one or both picks gets an upgrade

 

[Roostorm]

So. Pick 19 this years 1st.. to go with 2, 3 and 14…….(time to get creative with 14 & 19)
Two pick next year which are not guaranteed….under review… oh yayyyyyyy.
2. Rookie spots for next year….
and a f*$=$ you in relation to biding to sanders…what’s the point of academies…..

Gotta love keeping the integrity …

Still …..but we move on……over to you Brady…..

 

[Jesslc]

14 19 for 4? is that possible? probably not hey.

 

[Shinboner roo]

Mabie the AFL know they are getting those picks back for there pick 5 this year for I.e. our 14 this year +19,20, next years 19+20 will be for the GC kids next year

 

[Moti]

Plenty to work with here.

I agree, any assistance is

They need this year points.

We need to trade those picks for players.

They aren't that far behind their points requirement, and having us with 2 and 3 and not bidding on Walters means it costs at least 500 less.

 

[Lomas]

Not what I was hoping for but better than I expected.

Must trade the two next year for GCS pick 4 5. Maybe trade em all for four.

All three PPs for GCS pick .

As it stands would give us 2,3, 4 5, 14 15 which is a pretty decent hand and we hold on to our first round next year.

One to Brions for Ashcroft mark 2 in 2024. Maybe for this year Brions first and we give them our third.

 

[Flawed Genius]

They need this year points.

We need to trade those picks for players.

Ooh. Elijah Hollands? Denver Grainger Barrass? AARON NAUGHTON?

 

[Sphynx]

A reminder, these are not junk picks. These are often the sweet spot in the draft between elite athletes and elite footballers without the top level athletecism.

It's often also where the top defenders and rucks fall each draft.

 

[Disco Dew]

Not what I was hoping for but better than I expected.

Must trade the two next year for GCS pick 4 5. Maybe trade em all for four.

All three PPs for GCS pick .

As it stands would give us 2,3, 4 5, 14 15 which is a pretty decent hand and we hold on to our first round next year.

This is the afls way of giving us an early first rounder as compo that everyone in here is raging about not having.

 

[r_boy]

If we can trade the F1s it's not all hopeless but depends what we do with it

 

[FlyHigh18]

Everyone was hoping for pick 11 to help with our trading strategy.
AFL ended up giving us even more in point value. How is this bad? We were never taking a player with 11.

The only bad thing is no sanders.

We now have enough to make a play for GC #4 and some change.

 

[giantroo]

"North Melbourne will be free to take the picks to the draft or use them in trades."

Roos receive three first-round picks as AFL ticks off assistance package

North Melbourne have been granted an assistance package from the AFL.

www.sen.com.au

 

[4cunningTonneTruck]

We won't outbid Dogs for GC pick anymore. Hopefully whoever we pick with pick 25 in a shallow draft can help lift us off the ladder. Or watch us use those picks to overpay for Stephens or Fisher or another fringe player

 

[r_boy]

Everyone was hoping for pick 11 to help with our trading strategy.
AFL ended up giving us even more in point value. How is this bad? We were never taking a player with 11.

The only bad thing is no sanders.

If you can't trade the F1s you'd have no faith the AFL won't strip them next year

 

[Disco Dew]

Honestly, the more I think about it the better I think this package is. I know we all want an early pick or access to sanders but let’s be real, that was never going to happen. However this package is similar to what I thought we should get last year.